It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: Arouet
Personally, I never viewed these as actual predictions in so much as attention getting.
What better way to grab numerous Anon's attention than to spout imminent arrests of Clinton.
To my recollection, it was shortly after this that folks started really paying attention and Q came out saying specifically that Disinformation or Misinformation was necessary.
Just my logical & simple minded way of thought process
originally posted by: Arouet
The reader will recall that on 16 August 2018, three, four or was it nine planes were forced to make emergency landings in South America due to bomb threats.
duckduckgo.com... 2F16%2F4-planes-make-emergency-landings-in-south-america-over-bomb-threats-reports.html
duckduckgo.com... 2F16%2F4-planes-make-emergency-landings-in-south-america-over-bomb-threats-reports.html
sputniknews.com...
www.foxnews.com...
Immediately, we have a problem in that there are three different versions of the story, with three different counts of the number of flights affected (3, 4, 9).
The same day (16 Aug), Q drops #1919. Q claims that it was four planes and the event happened within a week of it posting four "BOOM"s with the note [next week] (QDrop 1846, see below).
There was no mention of Russian media reporting nine, nor of Fox initially reporting four, but the next day dropping the count to three.
Furthermore, QDrop 1846 appears to be referencing the stolen Q-400 at Seattle's SeaTac airport and makes no mention of bomb threats, airplanes (other than a photo of the stolen craft) or South America. The post says something about "next week," which could possibly be interpreted as a reference, though it was six days prior, not seven or more. It was posted on Saturday, 11 August 2018, and Thursday, 16 August 2018, was technically "next week," though the word "boom" to me implies actual explosions and not threats.
originally posted by: eisegesis
Considering the scope, the amount of variables, the pushback and evasive menuvering done by those in "power," I'm actually completely comfortable admitting that I don't care if Q is occasionally wrong (by appearance).
There, I said it.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: a871a8 No.2758106 📁 Aug 27 2018 18:10:22 (EST) saraacarter.com...📁 >>BIG PUZZLE PIECE Who is systematically arranging the leaks to select individuals? Why is this important [to drop] prior to BO testimony? Q