TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

a reply to: crankyoldman

I think...I hope...SS et al are keeping an eye on the person that wrote about a "higher loyalty" and tweeted about "superior characters" from a quote by C. D. Larsen on Sept. 3rd. That certain someone DOES have connections, as does the certain someone that recently got his security clearance removed.

Q tells us the POTUS is safeguarded and we can only pray that is so.

a reply to: crankyoldman

I have pointed out, and shown proof, several times in other threads, that Congress formally requested the president to declassify all of these documents on May 15th and also on September 6th.

But most people only go by what they hear from the mainstream media. As President Trump has said, the mainstream media is the biggest enemy of America right now.

originally posted by: DanskMacabre
a reply to: crankyoldman

I woundn't worry about the average person understanding the FISA process.

The average Senator doesn't understand the FISA process.

Lefties lining up to defend corrupt cops is actually my favorite part of this whole thing.

I know, but cranky is worried about the bigger esoteric fish fry.

As QOS says, the TDS has turned rooting out corruption into a threat to one's personal safety. I admit, I did not see this particular weirdness coming at all.

the D Entendre is funny

Instructions: Split, Flip, Attach, Reverse (search)

Post a "visually similar image" to qualify.


Good Luck

a reply to: crankyoldman

Ah but these people thrive on fear and influence... which they are all but out of...

Their legacies are already destroyed.

Off-topic.

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: eisegesis

I don't trust people who like to play esoteric games with the "profane".

You are part of the problem.

Your attitude is part of a bigger problem.

Off-topic.

originally posted by: eisegesis

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: eisegesis

I don't trust people who like to play esoteric games with the "profane".

You are part of the problem.

Your attitude is a part of a bigger problem.

I absolutely despise anything hinting at esoterics.

But I appreciate what you do.

If everyone understood this garbage the way you do there would be no esoterics...

originally posted by: FlyingFox

I haven't had any feedback on the allegory,

Feedback: I always liked these circles too, as I believe there are degrees of evil. Its interesting that treachery is way at the bottom. Thats what the cult is really about. And thats what the current FISA issue is about.

a reply to: Skyfloating

I like that treachery is at the bottom as well...

What does it mean to betray the Great Work?

originally posted by: crankyoldman

I am just lost as to why people cannot seemingly put things together in the manner they happen.

A docile and confused populace need to regain their power of thought.

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: eisegesis

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: eisegesis

I don't trust people who like to play esoteric games with the "profane".

You are part of the problem.

Your attitude is a part of a bigger problem.

What's a bigger problem than playing devil's advocate with exclusive knowledge? It's very narcissistic.

Relax my ignorant friend. You've only excluded yourself.

Off-topic.

a reply to: eisegesis

A key, a book, a rose.

Some pancakes?

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: eisegesis

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: eisegesis

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: eisegesis

I don't trust people who like to play esoteric games with the "profane".

You are part of the problem.

Your attitude is a part of a bigger problem.

What's a bigger problem than playing devil's advocate with exclusive knowledge? It's very narcissistic.

Relax my ignorant friend. You've only excluded yourself.

If you were "denying ignorance" properly, it would not appear to be exclusive.

The only person outed here is you, by this very post.

Hit me with some substance, please.

Do you let a child drive a potentially dangerous vehicle before their feet can reach the gas and brake pedals? No, of course not... they first need to grow.

Grow up and things won't appear so exclusive to you.

Did or Didn't Congress give RR a deadline to turn over the unredacted documents? Or am I confusing that with the one's already released

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Congress seems to be incompetent on any issue, other than to slow walk anything of value and hoping we forget.

No difference than usual, other than more are paying attention to them I hope.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

I don't believe an actual deadline has been set. My recollection was basically, "as soon as possible" and Sara Carter (i think) was speculating it could be withing a couple three days.... or sooo..... knowing how fast they all move to comply with these sortsa things....

a reply to: MetalThunder

Incompetent is an understatement. I hope they know we're paying attention this time