TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

originally posted by: Strate8
a reply to: Krazysh0t
That at least 1 person (maybe more) is post as Q is 100% verifiable.

Obviously someone is posting the content; as far as I'm concerned the guy is an uber-troll. I'm talking about Q being a real person in the government with Q level clearance.

When I say real as HRC, I mean exactly that. Is HRC a good liberal democrat or a corrupt murderer? It is your belief system that steers your perception of them. Is Q someone that is an insider fighting against evil or a fake giving people false hope? Largely depends on your belief system until something actually happens to prove either way.

For the second time. I don't give a # about Hillary Clinton. Why is that so hard for you to understand? She isn't guilty of anything indictable either, but just because I say that doesn't mean I support her as a politician.

If that question is directly to me, I stated my opinion on my first post here. If DECLAS does not happen and we attack Syria in a substantial way then, no, I don't think Q is a legit white hat. I would lean to Q being another disinfo campaign by someone. If HRC does not pay for her crimes against the US, then the battle was all fake and we are lost as a nation.

So basically your rule for belief is that HRC, someone you've judged guilty without a trial, doesn't go to jail then we are lost as a nation? You DO know that the US considers people innocent until proven guilty right?

You ridicule and make fun of a movement of people that want our country returned to the rule of law. I don't care about you and your own twisted form of entertainment. I want to see an end to the stunning level of corruption in a government which is supposed to serve the people of this country instead of raping them of everything they have.

Yes. I like to ridicule stupidity.

If you care about corruption then why aren't you about investigating Trump for corruption like violating the emoluments clause?

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: JustWaiting

Please make the hurting stop.
⚗

originally posted by: JustWaiting

Manafort is Podesta Group

McCain Institute = Clinton Foundation

Carter Page was spied on illegally as was the rest of the administration after that.

Epstein is a piece of #. If you are looking for Trump connections to his human trafficking # it aint there. Trust me the search was exhaustive.

ANTIFA=MediaMatters=Soros

Big Media wants to censor conservatives without saying it out loud.

Hope Hicks and James Mattis are saving the Planet.

You were all warned.

I just saw a bit that Manforts "deal" indicated a whole lot of his efforts were for Obama et al. #theteamlost@

The remarkable cognitive dissonance is this "Trust me the search was exhaustive." Not ONE of the establishment wanted Trump in. Clintons Controlled, evidently, the encryption keys to internet/FBI/NSA. With an near infinite amount of resources and decades to make sure he never got elected, and vote rigging, goog, fb etc. there is nothing. There can't be, otherwise he would have never got in. Cogitative dissonance is a helluva drug.

originally posted by: queenofswords
Have you ever had a large family gathering where everybody is sitting around the pool talking, discussing, even debating, then laughing and eating and enjoying the healthy conversation? Then that one drunk uncle that hates everybody shows up, late, of course, and .....you know the rest.

"Well, we need to be going. Nice to see everybody. Sure enjoyed the afternoon, but we need to get to bed early tonight. Things to do. See 'ya next time".

"Bbbut, I jussss got here! You think your soooo much better (burp) than me. Well, I have something to say (belch) and you need to stick around and listen (burb)....."

Suddenly, the party is over, the host shuts it all down, and the drunk uncle accomplished his goal.

You betchya!

Only nowadays the "drunk uncle" gets a humble paycheck from an organization for his participation. And he's not drunk, he's drinking monster energy drinks.

And if he breaks up the party, he gets rewarded.

a reply to: JustWaiting

Well THAT'S a productive post...

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: JustWaiting

Manafort is Podesta Group

McCain Institute = Clinton Foundation

Carter Page was spied on illegally as was the rest of the administration after that.

Epstein is a piece of #. If you are looking for Trump connections to his human trafficking # it aint there. Trust me the search was exhaustive.

ANTIFA=MediaMatters=Soros

Big Media wants to censor conservatives without saying it out loud.

Hope Hicks and James Mattis are saving the Planet.

You were all warned.

I just saw a bit that Manforts "deal" indicated a whole lot of his efforts were for Obama et al. #theteamlost@

The remarkable cognitive dissonance is this "Trust me the search was exhaustive." Not ONE of the establishment wanted Trump in. Clintons Controlled, evidently, the encryption keys to internet/FBI/NSA. With an near infinite amount of resources and decades to make sure he never got elected, and vote rigging, goog, fb etc. there is nothing. There can't be, otherwise he would have never got in. Cogitative dissonance is a helluva drug.

Cranky they never thought he would win! LOL, we will see who has the last laugh. I’m not worried POTUS thank you for fighting for our rights on a daily basis. Keep draining the swamp I’m not tired of winning!

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
To be clear, they were banned for doxxing, stalking, issuing death threats and the mods encouraging this behavior.

The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.

We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.

Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.

u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.

u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a #ing child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s #ing like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a #ing PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.

incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on

Examples of incite in a Sentence

The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.

the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours

You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.

Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.

Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.

Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.

This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.

We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me

So Q makes a post on 8chan and some guy gets harrassed on Twitter...what does this have to do with the 'Great Awakening' sub-Reddit exactly?

originally posted by: JustWaiting
a reply to: JustWaiting

Please explain to ME how the FISA violation was legal.

Im all ears.

CNN said the process was classified so you don't know it from them.

Explain how it was illegal. I'm not going to prove a negative.

You have 0 credibility in this area and everyone here knows it.

I really don't care if you are offended by my disbelief.

Also if you think I'm some random in this thread you don't know # about Q or where you are.

You are a random to me. A random who sounds like he has an overinflated sense of importance. And I know enough about Q to know it is bull#.

You can actually use Q's moniker around here without getting banned.

-Green@

And?

originally posted by: EnzoD

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
To be clear, they were banned for doxxing, stalking, issuing death threats and the mods encouraging this behavior.

The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.

We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.

Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.

u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.

u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a #ing child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s #ing like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a #ing PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.

incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on

Examples of incite in a Sentence

The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.

the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours

You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.

Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.

Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.

Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.

This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.

We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me

So Q makes a post on 8chan and some guy gets harrassed on Twitter...what does this have to do with the 'Great Awakening' sub-Reddit exactly?

Why don't you read the content in those posts? It's spelled out pretty clearly in them.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I've read it. Where's the proof that this harassment was organised or incited via the Great Awakening sub-Reddit?

a reply to: EnzoD

It's listed in the posts and the links I provided. If you don't want to believe it, you'll have to post evidence why it is untrue or tell me why. I've already posted the proof. It's your turn to put up.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Emoluments Clause lol. 99% of politicians could (and should) be prosecuted for that.

That's rich, funny even. How about HRC proven to have private server and proven to share classified information through private email. 100% is already out there and her not getting convicted of it is proof to just how corrupt our government is.

If you don't care about HRC that tells me everything I need to know about you. She is the postergoul of corruption in government and you don't give a #! Willfully look away from the facts that are out there. Like I said, it is about your belief system on who you support and attack. I would not want to be the kind of person you support.

Last, Q being a real person in government is too low a standard. Plenty of those out there with very bad intentions. The question is whether Q is a "whitehat" and that remains to be seen.

originally posted by: Strate8
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Emoluments Clause lol. 99% of politicians could (and should) be prosecuted for that.

Nice cop out. So this forgives Trump for it then?

That's rich, funny even. How about HRC proven to have private server and proven to share classified information through private email. 100% is already out there and her not getting convicted of it is proof to just how corrupt our government is.

How about the fact that the private server wasn't an indictable offense? What about all the Trump administration people using a private server? Do you not care about them?

If you don't care about HRC that tells me everything I need to know about you. She is the postergoul of corruption in government and you don't give a #! Willfully look away from the facts that are out there. Like I said, it is about your belief system on who you support and attack. I would not want to be the kind of person you support.

Yes. Yes. I know all about how you guys are obsessed with Hillary Clinton.

Last, Q being a real person in government is too low a standard. Plenty of those out there with very bad intentions. The question is whether Q is a "whitehat" and that remains to be seen.

Baby steps, mate. Let's prove he has Q clearance first.

Please read these PSAs. They are there to remind people that decorum is a requirement even in passionate debates and discussions.

We're closing the thread for a short interlude so everyone can have a moment to relax and reflect. Normal service will resume in half an hour.

Reopened.

Please respect the PSAs and remember that decorum improves the discussion.

As usual...do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

not at all a coincidence they are dancing widdershins