Trump’s Alleged Love Child Back In News After Doorman Freed From Contract

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

It looks like Dino Sajudin just wants his 15 minutes of fame? Is the doorman broke or just another nut?

But the unnamed woman at the center of the story “emphatically” denied that she had an affair with Trump.

“This is all fake,” she previously told the Associated Press.

“He’s infamous for making up stories,” said Nikki Benfatto, Sajudin’s ex-wife.

“He’s seen the chupacabra,” she said, the mythical dog-like monster that stalks livestock. “He’s seen Bigfoot. One of our friends who passed away, he saw him too, walking down the street.”

nypost.com...

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: UKTruth

I made no complaint about conservative morals. I pointed out that trumps actions seem to go against what I understand conservative morals to be. See the difference? Maybe I worded my original point in a manner that was not quite clear to you. Maybe I should have said, reeks of a moral standard completely apart from proclaimed conservative morality.

Your comment did not come out the way you explain now in your previous post I'm glad I read the next few too haha..

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: UKTruth

You point out good questions about this latest news. Yes it was before his run in 2015, however we cannot ignore that he had been planning his run for potus long before the 2016 elections. This easily could have been a preemptive move on his part.

Myself, I do not hold that the campaign violation is really a viable course of hope. For me , his cover up monies go more to demonstrating that Trump is not a man of the people, a man who will stand up and take the consequences for his own actions but rather will use his wealth to cover up any and all ''bad press'' due to his own actions. That reeks of exactly what I have thought to be one of the great hallmarks of conservative morals.

I'm pretty sure that about 98.6% of the people who voted for Trump knew that he was just human, was a billionaire and a tv star. That combination rarely produces people who willingly admit to misdeeds and take every means available to hide their less than stellar behaviors. Most people realize that if caught in the same situation and having the means to do so, they too would hide their indiscretions. Wouldn't you?

With the notable exception of Jimmy Carter I think every president in my lifetime, beginning with Eisenhower, has been a womanizer who needed cover at some time in his life so this isn't really a new trend at all. The major difference is that the media went along with the cover-ups right up until the blue dress forced disclosure. To say that Trump somehow bamboozled the voters into thinking he was lily-white and without sin is just---well, a bit of silly because most of us have some behavior in our past that we'd rather keep as far into the closet as possible.

originally posted by: Deetermined
Is the doorman broke or just another nut?

A bit of both.

a reply to: randomthoughts12

Yeah, I'm glad UK Truth brought that up so I could make myself clearer.

a reply to: UKTruth

Yet does not the Christian Right want to infuse their morals into government? There is a long list of attempts to turn aspects of this government over to the Almighty. I shouldn't have to make a list here, it has been a push for as long as this nation has existed.

It is also easy to find religious groups all across the country espousing their belief that Trump is Gods tool in turning this nation back to a righteous path.

So maybe my question here, my point, is just how long, how much of his non-christian activities do you think it will take before the more moderate of these people turn on him. While non christian conservatives may have no problem with his shenanigans, who long will they accept the hypocracy within there own ranks.

a reply to: Deetermined

There does seem to be information that this is an already put to bed scandal. But why then, did this doorman get paid thirty thousand dollars to keep his mouth shut, that's the point I find interesting. Why cover it up if there is nothing to cover up? Why not just sue the guy for libel or slander?

a reply to: diggindirt
And I do not deny your points, nor to I care where or when he waved his willy.
And as I see it, the reason that the media now is having open season on all of these things is not just because he is Trump, but rather that there has been a push for more honest government. Isn't this what so many conservatives and leftist alike are calling for?

It's an expose world. People want it. There are dozens of tell all magazines. TV shows to root out the truth, to expose . Sixty Minutes, Dateline Info Wars. It's the nature of the media business now. Why? Because of the very simple concept that has been touted by every businessman since this system of economics was invented.
Because it's what people want.

So all this digging at Trump is just part of that process. And my problem with all of this is again, not where he waved his willy but rather that Trump has been turned to to lead the way to more honest government when is himself is such a liar. That still makes no sense to me

Back

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Deetermined

There does seem to be information that this is an already put to bed scandal. But why then, did this doorman get paid thirty thousand dollars to keep his mouth shut, that's the point I find interesting. Why cover it up if there is nothing to cover up? Why not just sue the guy for libel or slander?

I mean trump probably did these things imo or he didn't no real proof. you pay off these people to stop talking and to not feed their story to the press where they can make $$$$. either way the entire objective is simply $$$$ always about the $$$$

why would he want these stories looming if he can just pay them off to shut up.

a reply to: JDmOKI

I must really be missing the whole thing here. Are you saying that all I have to do is to go to the National Inquirer and submit a somewhat valid sounding story of dirt on Trump and they will buy my story to keep it from reaching a wider audience? That can't be all that there is to this can it?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

yea if you have some connection with trump I'm sure you can say you sold your body to him and blackmail him later... kidding of course

happens all the time when you have lots of money.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

There does seem to be information that this is an already put to bed scandal. But why then, did this doorman get paid thirty thousand dollars to keep his mouth shut, that's the point I find interesting. Why cover it up if there is nothing to cover up? Why not just sue the guy for libel or slander?

Real or not, once you put something out there, you can't take it back and it won't be forgotten. Thirty thousand is probably cheap to some people who have expensive lawyers and no time to deal with every bribe, blackmail, or threat personally on their own.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire
I think most people can differentiate between personal behavior of a decade ago and "honest government." This isn't Trump doing interns in the Oval office or using taxpayer funds to pay off staff because he's harassed them. But that takes critical thinking---something the journalistic crews seem short of these days.

While I agree that it's partly about the money there also seems to be a good dose of envy mixed in. Some people just can't stand the fact that there are people who are more successful in the economics world and in their personal lives.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Yea I am always rushing so some of my political posts can come way off base with a few mistakes haha. I was mainly confirming it came out wrong.