National Enquirer kept safe with damaging Trump stories

a reply to: wylekat

I tried using the National Enquirer as a puppy training pad. My puppy bit me.

Oh the outrage .... manufactured megaphone media outrage .... Still not working

When sexual harassers agree on confidential settlements with victims, at least the payments come out of the harassers' own pockets or from companies that choose to employ them. But not, as the nation has learned this month, when the harasser serves in Congress. Then, taxpayers foot the bill. And the entire episode remains hidden.

Sexual harassment fund exposes Congress

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: wylekat

I tried using the National Enquirer as a puppy training pad. My puppy bit me.

*dies laughing*

a reply to: Grambler

You Know , during the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries , Mistresses were an Acceptable Fashion among the Affluent Men of the Day . Even their Wives were not to Upset with their Husbands Extracurricular Activities concerning Sex outside of the Home if it Relieved the Sexual Demands Husbands put on them . Times Change , but Men NEVER Do ..............)

a reply to: norhoc

Adultery/Infidelity "Who Cares"... hmmm a fine trait for a man that is POTUS along with history off "PAYING OFF".

What A Guy!

I really feel safe knowing he has his finger on 6800 Nuclear Weapons and influence on the US economy... Now he just threatens your nation with financial collapse if you question him or try to remove him... What a guy.

I'm trying to think who he reminds me of????.... Oh that's right

a reply to: DreamerOracle


Adultery… if that's a big hang up for you man you must have hated most of our presidents and a good portion of the founding fathers.

The market crash, I would say that was more hyperbole but not totally off the mark. If you have a guy that is seen as pro business... and you remove him with an unknown and or replacement that is not so pro-business the market will contract as people move their money to where they feel it will be safer.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Well, last I checked Adultery was reasonable grounds for Divorce, being an actual crime against the agreement you undertook with your loved ones... It's not hard to tell someone you don't wish to be together but it is easier to lie!

What has to be brought into question is the MORAL COMPASS of a SERIAL ADULTERER and the untrustworthy nature of such a person.

Yes, I have a "Problem" with Adultery but then I have a Good Moral Compass.