It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To photographers and stargazers in northern climes, Steve has been a familiar night phenomenon for decades. But the mysterious ribbons of light only entered the scientific literature for the first time earlier this year, thanks largely to Steve-tracking efforts coordinated by Facebook groups like the Alberta Aurora Chasers. Writing in the journal Science Advances in March, researchers (including Gallardo-Lacourt) decided to keep the name "Steve" as the official nomenclature for the colorful happening, but they changed it to an acronym standing for "Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement" — aka STEVE.
Compared to the northern lights — which tend to shimmer in broad bands of green, blue or reddish light depending on their altitude — Steve is remarkably slim, usually appearing as a single ribbon of purplish-white light. What this ribbon lacks in girth, it makes up for in length; unlike the wavy northern lights, Steve appears to stab straight upward into the night sky, often spanning more than 600 miles (1,000 kilometers).
originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo
Used to see these occasionally when I lived in Tasmania.
Just an extension of an existing aurora australis and similar atmospheric lights if you ask me.
I lived in the north of the Tassie, so I think we saw pillars instead of a 'sheet' because we were further away from the main event that was at the south end of the planet and that meant we only got to see the scraps of it. It's outer edge.
They were pretty dim though so you had to go to somewhere really dark to see them well and the ones I witnessed were red and white.
Looked slightly different because those photos are using an exposure to show more than your eyes can pick up at night otherwise it was the exact same thing shown there.
If you'd been in the city of Hobart at the same time you would of seen something closer to a proper full blown aurora with the expected colours and effects.
So for me yeah, it's just normal atmospheric lights appearing in a way people aren't used to seeing them.
It's just a change of perspective is all, and we're seeing the 'run off' of an aurora currently occurring elsewhere.
Nothing weird, unusual or new about it. Possibly just the first time any ones bothered to take a picture.
Possibly not many people notice them because in areas with even a small amount of light pollution they become difficult to see.
Just my 2 cents.
That was the assumption. Which was wrong.
Just an extension of an existing aurora australis and similar atmospheric lights if you ask me.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo
That was the assumption. Which was wrong.
Just an extension of an existing aurora australis and similar atmospheric lights if you ask me.
Now the fun part starts.
It shoots straight up,
Steve appears as a very narrow arc extending for hundreds or thousands of miles, aligned east-west.
originally posted by: Pearj
Sounds like a Mandela Effect.
originally posted by: SR1TX
So basically you just proved my point.
It is seen on south and north at the same time. It shoots straight up, its a high frequency beam of light/particles. So Earth emits energy like a Pulsar and we see the radiation in beams of violet light.
I was right! The Earth emits its own light during Aurora!!!!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo
That was the assumption. Which was wrong.
Just an extension of an existing aurora australis and similar atmospheric lights if you ask me.
Now the fun part starts.
How is something I witnessed with my own eyes wrong or an assumption exactly? Only time I ever witnessed these coloured streaks in the sky, was during an aurora australis appearing.
Or is it some amazing coincidence science has explained away already?
Our results verify that this STEVE event is clearly distinct from the aurora since it is characterized by the absence of particle precipitation. Interestingly, its skyglow could be generated by a new and fundamentally different mechanism in the ionosphere.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo
Or is it some amazing coincidence science has explained away already?
Yes, as far as the coincidence part goes. Explaining it? Nope. Not really.
Our results verify that this STEVE event is clearly distinct from the aurora since it is characterized by the absence of particle precipitation. Interestingly, its skyglow could be generated by a new and fundamentally different mechanism in the ionosphere.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com...
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo
That was the assumption. Which was wrong.
Just an extension of an existing aurora australis and similar atmospheric lights if you ask me.
Now the fun part starts.
No I proved what is going on.
Its time for celebration!