Some Solid Questions to ask the Believers of the MSM Twist on Q

I came across a great article tonight that asked some very specific questions. They are simple to ask and anyone with half a brain would seriously have to stop and honestly ponder the answers. The article was addressing what the MSM has been trying to pull the last few days of making Q look like a thoroughly silly thing and the people that follow about even with being another crazed cult. We have all seen an example this and even I myself was targeted by the Washington Post as most of you know.

The sad thing here is that those that are actually reading these deceiving article are buying right into them and having themselves a good laugh at our expense. Without having any idea of the shallow depths of which the MSM has actually dug to get their facts. No surprise to us of course, but too the clueless it is most plausible.

This is why I am going to post the questions from the article which if you wish to read it in full, (which I do suggest) you can find it here
AT THIS LINK

We all have those friends and family members that are on their high horses looking down at us in amusement or disdain, confident that the MSM has confirmed what they have thought all along. These questions are for them. It is up to you to ask them. Im sure their answers or replies may actually be quite comical themselves. Their explanations even more so. Honestly? I would print these questions out and keep them in your pocket so you have them handy in case you suffer a moment of brain freeze at the worst possible time. Yes, that happens.

Lets get started shall we?

1. Why has not a single one of these media organizations asked President Trump whether Q is legitimate, since this would immediately resolve the matter for everyone? How do you account for this journalistic lapse in elementary data gathering before publishing a story slurring such a large group of ordinary people?

2. Why do they not cite or rebut Q’s drops, as would be normal journalistic practice in disproving something of factual debate? If they are self-evidently false, this should be trivially easy. Why do you think they refuse to engage on the facts, but offer emotive innuendo in its place?

3. Why is there no mention of the 45,000 sealed indictments (50x growth over normal), signifying impending mass arrests? This is a matter of public fact and record — as are the unprecedented CEO resignations (very few being rehired…) and politicians withdrawing from office. What’s your hypothesis for this omission?

4. Why is there no concomitant coverage of the significant increases (5x over past) in arrests and convictions for human trafficking and child pornography, yet there are constant protestations that widespread “elite” paedophilia (aka “pizzagate”) is a “debunked” matter? The press coverage of the sensational NXIVM cult trial — implicating those close to the Clinton Foundation with child sex slavery — is spectacularly muted. How do you account for this silence, given what Q tells us?

5. Why are the dozens and dozens of strong links between Q and the Trump administration given no credence? (Here are 45 for you to begin with — this would easily get you beyond the standard of proof for a court case.) Q encourages people to think for themselves, whereas you are being told by the MSM what to believe and ignore the evidence in front of your own eyes. How do you make sense of this data not being presented to you?

6. How come none of these organizations deemed #QAnon newsworthy before the Tampa rally, yet it is a movement that is suddenly threatening to the well being of democracy and society? How do you account for this timing and the coordinated message using identical terminology? (Although apparently following Q is simultaneously “fringe” and “wildly popular”!)

7. These same organizations overwhelmingly supported Hillary Clinton for President, and wrongly predicted her win right up until the last minute. They have widespread and documented links to the Democratic party, both legitimate (as donors) and illegitimate (illegal and unethical relationships documented by Wikileaks). Are they dispassionate reporters of fact, or active players in the political game attempting to shape the narrative? How might it affect their reporting on Q?

This last one you can use just to point out how little they have actually dug to get what little information they do have and how wrong they got it.

8. Given that these media reports make many basic factual errors, are they credible journalism? Here’s one (from the Guardian)

: Q has never posted on Reddit. Does this suggest familiarity with the subject matter, or profound ignorance?

Here is the link again to read the full article. It really does warm the heart to see that someone out there gets it. Link to FULL ARTICLE

I hope this helps you in some sort of way. We know it is only going to get worse, but at least now you have something solid in your pocket to work with and slow them down.

I would not be too concerned about those who can't believe.

Understand that, too believe also means that they have been living in a safe place of their own making.

They do not want to believe! It will destroy their safe world and expose them to real or imagined dangers.

Our task now is to educate these people when they are ready.

As soon as mass arrests start ... many will come to you, embarrassed that they have to, and they will ask you to explain it all to them. That is the next task for all of the Autists.

You are one of the millions of experts on the subject and ... eventually ... people will look up to you.

Trust the plan.

P

It should be obvious now the media, the FBI, and the highest reaches of governments around the world are human traffickers. They are trying to control the narrative.

These are the secret societies we are up against. They are Satanists. They created the system. They don't want to lose control of it.

I think they will be fully exposed eventually. It's insane to me people still trust anything on the television.

a reply to: onehuman

Ohh here we go again.....Another Q thread. I actually don’t care if a thread is pro or against but the fact that people are this dumb to follow this “thing” is just stupid. Guys’Gals c’mon. We should be smarter than this.

I agree with both of you. Been on Q since day 1, have a whole site built and dedicated to it plus a lot of the dig info. Opened it to the public on New Years. Mainly because i was sick of being limited on what I could and if I said something that was in the correct sheep realm I would get shadow banned.

I just thought these questions would be good for the laughers mainly and also good to casually toss out there for a conversation starter.

Honestly I cant wait to answer all the questions Ive been trying to explain to them for years and they didnt want to hear it. Im sure you get that seeing as you are members here. Im thrilled to finally have some real solid proof that weve been right all along. Not that we didnt have proof to begin with, but validation I guess. Not to mention how much more I have learned as far as some of the true depths of things we have discussed on here in all kinds of topics

originally posted by: onehuman

5. Why are the dozens and dozens of strong links between Q and the Trump administration given no credence? (Here are 45 for you to begin with — this would easily get you beyond the standard of proof for a court case.) Q encourages people to think for themselves, whereas you are being told by the MSM what to believe and ignore the evidence in front of your own eyes. How do you make sense of this data not being presented to you?

Here goes "Exhibit #1":
threadreaderapp.com...


Zoom in look at the dates. "Q" asked the question 3 days after it was in the News. That something supposedly came of the meeting, even if something absolutely came of the meeting, doesnt give Q any credit just because asks who went there (which Q already knew obviously it was in the news).


MODS: Can we have a focus thread that fleshes out the reality of these supposed "Trump-Q Links". This thing where EVERYTHING about the Q subject can ONLY be handled in that one ultra super mega epic jumbotron thread is absurd. This policy is facilitating ignorance. FFS.

edit on 9-8-2018 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

a reply to: onehuman

That Q NEVER answers any of these questions, acronyms, initials, meanings etc etc etc it/he/they jumble up in all that "drops" noise makes an outrageously offensively brazenly absurd mockery of the entire ordeal.

Assuming that someone or an organization is on side is a very dangerous assumption.

Know thine enemy in all of it's guises.

Soon it will be dark to light.

Too many white hats in play to be obvious.

Shine the light brightly.

P

a reply to: Allaroundyou

It''s not just following, it's active participation in delivering the truth to the unbelievers. I'ts spreading the truth.
When one helps spread the truth, ones ego becomes embedded in ''the cause''. When one is in ''a cause'' there is the drive to be a leader, an elder, a mentor if you will, helping the ''new borns' into the light. Here is an example.

Been on Q since day 1, have a whole site built and dedicated to it plus a lot of the dig info. Opened it to the public on New Years. Mainly because i was sick of being limited on what I could and if I said something that was in the correct sheep realm I would get shadow banned.

The Q thing is a self perpetuating cult. The center is the ''truth giver'' and all the rest line up to help the rest of us.

Here is an example of advise for the followers from the OP

I would print these questions out and keep them in your pocket so you have them handy in case you suffer a moment of brain freeze at the worst possible time

Cult think. Memorize the mantras if you can but if not, rely upon the written reminders.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

Here is the perfect example of the things I suggested in that last post of mine.You have already read it above, but here it is again. Perfect cult belief.

I would not be too concerned about those who can't believe.

Understand that, too believe also means that they have been living in a safe place of their own making.

They do not want to believe! It will destroy their safe world and expose them to real or imagined dangers.

Our task now is to educate these people when they are ready.

As soon as mass arrests start ... many will come to you, embarrassed that they have to, and they will ask you to explain it all to them. That is the next task for all of the Autists.

You are one of the millions of experts on the subject and ... eventually ... people will look up to you.

Trust the plan.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Perfect cult belief.

The TRUTH is never a cult. The TRUTH and Cults are enemies of each other and always have been.

P

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Allaroundyou

It''s not just following, it's active participation in delivering the truth to the unbelievers. I'ts spreading the truth.
When one helps spread the truth, ones ego becomes embedded in ''the cause''. When one is in ''a cause'' there is the drive to be a leader, an elder, a mentor if you will, helping the ''new borns' into the light. Here is an example.

Been on Q since day 1, have a whole site built and dedicated to it plus a lot of the dig info. Opened it to the public on New Years. Mainly because i was sick of being limited on what I could and if I said something that was in the correct sheep realm I would get shadow banned.

The Q thing is a self perpetuating cult. The center is the ''truth giver'' and all the rest line up to help the rest of us.

Here is an example of advise for the followers from the OP

I would print these questions out and keep them in your pocket so you have them handy in case you suffer a moment of brain freeze at the worst possible time

Cult think. Memorize the mantras if you can but if not, rely upon the written reminders.

I like you Terry but the first three sentences of your first response give huge RED FLAGS.

originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Perfect cult belief.

The TRUTH is never a cult. The TRUTH and Cults are enemies of each other and always have been.

P

Absolute statement there, ''never''. Cults thrive on believers believing in absolutes. Any, and I mean any study of cults will offer at least one thing that cults have in common, a believe that they are privy to the truth, or as you put it ''TRUTH''.

Take any cult you want and you will find this to be true, believers believe regardless of how irrational that ''truth' may be''.
They will not listen to anyone who differs from their belief, indeed they will and do develop elaborate scenarios of why they are right and all the disbelievers are wrong.

This is true of cults. If this simple observation is difficult to see, it is likely that those not able to see it are under some form of cult-think

Notice how what I just wrote seems oddly familiar, similar to the things that were said above in support of the Q thing?
This is because while you suggest that TRUTH and cults are enemies, the reality is that cults will almost always use as much truth as they can to support it's agenda

a reply to: pheonix358

I've just made a little correction: "You are one of the millions of youtube-experts on the subject and ... eventually ... people will look up to you."

a reply to: Allaroundyou

Yes, I see that. I was speaking from the point of view of the believer, the cultist. They believe they have the truth and act and think accordingly.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

And how many cult leaders encourage thinking, researching, and finding the truth independently.

I believe the lack of certainty, the lack of proveabilty ~ either way, true or false really bothers certain personally types.

Belief in researching, and drawing ones own conclusions can not be debunked. It is what it is, for each person individually.

Probably just a way to galvanize the believers of Q. They're so far down the rabbit hole there's probably no escape for them, especially now that the media is calling them suckers.

Believers in Q will believe pretty much the opposite of anything the media says so I guess this means Q is more real than ever before in their eyes. Forget all the failed predictions, the media is saying it's fake so it MUST be real.

a reply to: onehuman

I am thoroughly versed in what Q is as I've followed it here. You will find my participation in almost every thread. And I think it's just some silly thing.
So finding that media agrees isn't much of a surprise to me. No surprise at all actually.

Q has failed predictions from day one and hoaxed images

That time lapse image of a helicopter in Hawaii said to be a missile fired at AF1 would be in the Hoax bin if that was in an aviation thread

Didn't that other thread get shut down siting no spin off threads?

Just a heads up...