TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Do you really want to set a precedent of not stating things as factual or correct when they are just opinion?

Have you seen the title of this thread? Have you read the laughable first page? This whole thread is based off opinion.

a reply to: ItsNotRelevant

I just said the EXACT same things not 3 pages back. Are you copying my content without my permission?

a reply to: PokeyJoe

And for those new to Q heres a thread that exposes that Q may be a Prank after all

"Has Q-Anon Been A Leftist Prank All Along?"
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are increasing little snippets of evidence emerging that Q-Anon has been a prank on alt-right baby boomers. It's hard to sum up at this point exactly what Q is about, it's grown and mutated into this huge weird thing, the crux of which revolves around Donald Trump being a lone superhero single handedly fighting off a cabal of evil satanic pedophiles. But, this is not the thread for even attempting to recap the immensity of the Q conspiracy theory.

Q is slowly gaining more and more media attention. But here's the thing, over on 4chan, Q followers are starting to suspect it's all been a prank all along:

"Q is pols greatest achievement, look at how many normies and boomers got sucked into our LULZ chaos. Good job anons, looking forward to our next prank."

And here's the evidence....

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Unless you are in collusion with the detractors, please ignore whatever they say.

a reply to: ItsNotRelevant

dashens opening posts in all threads are full of political baiting that gets anyone else the comment deleted and a deduction in points

it’s a political baiting thread full of lies

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I'm sure it's used in other arena's, but It's not a very trendy thing here

GJBFFNPO.C

I think (and you already feel the same way) their are a few different leads to follow in the letter sequence.

Governor Jerry Brown (Jeb Bush) False Flag

And NPO.C a different path to follow

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Unless you are in collusion with the detractors, please ignore whatever they say.

yeah that’s it ignore the reality that Q is a hoax and stick your head in the sand

Serously mods this little Q experiment thread you allowed has just created an alt right troll gang on the board

Great if you love memes and lies

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: Gandalf77

If all you have now is insults I'm glad.

It means you are close to done.

Same for your stupid memes.
Oh, and if you've actually been following the current trial, you'd know they've covered all kinds of things since 2006.
Or let me guess: Q hasn't filled you in yet?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: TiltAtMills
The new shill song has grown quite shrill.

Too bad none of the doubters who have been swirling this thread for the last year have been able to debunk Q for the MSM.

Oh well!

I for one welcome as much MSM coverage as possible. Especially the really terrible pieces that look like they were done by toddlers....or BuzzFeed

😂

At the least the new crop of doubters have join dates that show they just signed up like 5 minutes ago.
Unlike the old-school crowd that took over abandoned user ID's from years ago, to create the impression they were ATS posters of long standing.

And you have proof of this, or are we still in to our fantasy role playing mode?

There's a whole slew of posters with join dates in the 2009-2012 range, with a tiny amount of posts (like a few hundred), who only seem to turn up to crap in the Q threads. They are obvious thread trolls. As I said before, I had been wondering if they were somehow faking their join date, but a more likely theory is that the trolls have taken over old inactive accounts, because the early join date will create a kind of seniority, and some people will be inclined to give their posts more weight.

a reply to: ItsNotRelevant

Opinions are not laughable.

These threads have MONTHS of solid research.

I am simply stating it is DISHONEST for people to claim their opinions are fact.

Researchers here have not ever done so.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

What exactly did I copy? Post the EXACT same thing that I copied.

I didn't realise your opinion was the only one that mattered.
And I just wanted the thread OP to correct their statement on this coincidence/proof.

Otherwise it will appear again and again when new members ask for proof. Like all the other "proof" that gets wheeled out.

Tweets = debunked
Photos = debunked
17 = debunked
Predictions = debunked

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Would not surprise me, Q is doing more to damage divide the Trump base than anything from the Left.

It is not going to be good for the midterms. But i'm sure Q will cover that early with some excuses.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

One word. Buzzfeed. That’s all I gotta say about that. Did you find out from one of their quizzes what vegetable you are too?

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
For new eyes:

The constant claim that Q photos etc. have been debunked is ONLY the opinion of posters, nothing has been successfully debunked.

What was debunked was the insinuation that Q could only have taken that pic aboard AF1.

Donald J. Trump
‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
The Iran sanctions have officially been cast. These are the most biting sanctions ever imposed, and in November they ratchet up to yet another level. Anyone doing business with Iran will NOT be doing business with the United States. I am asking for WORLD PEACE, nothing less!

2:31 AM - 7 Aug 2018


"Iran Next"

twitter.com...

a reply to: Sabrechucker

No but I will

a reply to: PokeyJoe

How about the quotes that were from the authors of the Book?

a reply to: carewemust

I won't continue.

I just feel people need to be called out on their dishonest posts.

So it took three pages to finally get to an external source, and we get the same buzzturd article that I graded as crap yesterday.

Nice job.

No wonder Anti-Q posts get binned so quickly.

These threads have given everyone more than enough links to argue on a point by point basis, but few if any of the detractors will. (Credit to Dr. D, who actually produces)

Ignore the pictures from Q, I'm talking about the actual stuff with words and constructed arguments, or sourced documents turned up here.

Waiting...patiently...

a reply to: Whereismypassword

Wimpy how is the no go zones in your GREAT country? I see your mates on the news and wonder why tough guys like you don't take to the streets and take your city back? or do you like that little munchkin running London?