TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: PokeyJoe

That article needs to be quoted in comments to every MSM article portraying Q as a Ludicrous Larp.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: PokeyJoe

That article needs to be quoted in comments to every MSM article portraying Q as a Ludicrous Larp.

Right! Finally someone had the balls to not be a complete stooge. So refreshing!

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: PokeyJoe

That article needs to be quoted in comments to every MSM article portraying Q as a Ludicrous Larp.

Yes, definitely a must-read, perfect for those unfamiliar with the whole thing.

From the article, a great point few could reasonably argue:

Here’s a good tip: Any time the news establishment in sudden unison jumps up and screams at the top of their lungs, “Nothing to see here! Nonsense, nonsense! Nothing to see!” it’s a good time to pay attention.

the article

a reply to: tiredoflooking

It seems to me hypocrical of our Canadian Ambassador to SA to point his finger at Saudi human rights abuses (which are real and ought to be called out) when our own record of human rights abuses is appalling. Has the Ambassador visited any of our Native Reserves?
Shacks and Slop Pails

a reply to: queenofswords

It’s not really possible for a human being to imagine a trillion gallons of water. So here are some analogies: * It’s 9 percent of the total water needed to end the California drought, according to NASA (which reported in December that the state has a water deficit of 11 trillion gallons). * It’s about 40 million swimming pools and 24 billion baths. * It’s about equal to the capacity of Florida’s vast Lake Okeechobee.

~ Source

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
Check it out guys, maybe the most unbiased, best written article on Q to date:

stream.org...

Thank you for sharing that link. I really liked his matter of fact opinion. It was very straight forward. Especially, his summation:

We could find out tomorrow the whole thing is a sham. But the belief “Where we go one, we go all” is no lark. It is “One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

Instead, I have to wonder what would motivate the mainstream media to erupt in such a unified chorus of contempt? What is so ghastly about people researching for themselves matters affecting the nation’s governance? Wrestling with questions posed in a Socratic method, forcing readers to think, to debate, to share? Perhaps getting it wrong, perhaps getting it right?

Even if a prank that’s grown out of hand, a well-meaning amusement or an educational game gone wild, what’s the problem? What is it about a community that believes in a government of the people, by the people and for the people that has the media minds so hostile? 

Simple: A public that believes in each other and America’s principles more than our government and media institutions poses a mortal threat.

I have to wonder what would motivate the mainstream media to erupt in such a unified chorus of contempt? What is so ghastly about people researching for themselves matters affecting the nation’s governance? Wrestling with questions posed in a Socratic method, forcing readers to think, to debate, to share? Perhaps getting it wrong, perhaps getting it right?

stream.org...

a reply to: TomLawless

This is the one sentence from the article that touched me the most.

What is so ghastly about people researching for themselves matters affecting the nation’s governance?

a reply to: IAMTAT

those threads should be allowed to stand on their own, because they represent a different viewpoint. any attempt to integrate those views into this thread would just be shouted down, as they always are.

first you're mad you don't get your own forum, then you're mad people post in your thread disagreeing, now you're mad that people make their own threads to disagree in.

would you like a tissue?

or some help packing up this thread for your eventual move to the hoax bin?

a reply to: [post=23652245]Sillyolme[/post
Really? come on you are not that stupid to think Trump would save HRC? LOL
Your trolling game is weaker today....
back to lurk mode SMH

I would argue that this/these thread(s) has brought many new people to ATS.
With these threads, member Dashen has, most likely, set an all-time record for creating the most widely and longest running thread series in ATS history.


I often feel little respect or gratitude coming from management regarding what Dashen and so many many others have contributed to here.

originally posted by: fiverx313
a reply to: IAMTAT

those threads should be allowed to stand on their own, because they represent a different viewpoint. any attempt to integrate those views into this thread would just be shouted down, as they always are.

first you're mad you don't get your own forum, then you're mad people post in your thread disagreeing, now you're mad that people make their own threads to disagree in.

would you like a tissue?

or some help packing up this thread for your eventual move to the hoax bin?

We have "different viewpoints" discussed here. YOU being a case in point.

a reply to: IAMTAT

As someone whom has had a couple of other "Q-related" threads abruptly closed...I'm watching for fairness.

Your threads were removed for very specific reasons. You were trying to create threads on material that was already being discussed in this thread.

It's not about fairness. It's about your dishonesty.

originally posted by: Cassi3l
a reply to: Jusvistn

Actually, you are wrong !
Up until now, Trump has always maintained that he didn't know about the meetng
Why has he suddenly changed his tune about it ?

He didn't change anything. Everyone still insists Trump didn't know about the meeting until after.

Really, the sudden outrage is completely manufactured and phony. Everything that has been said in the last few days is just a rehash of what everyone has known for months now.

a reply to: introvert

ANOTHER case in point.
"Different viewpoints" already being discussed right here.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: queenofswords

It’s not really possible for a human being to imagine a trillion gallons of water. So here are some analogies: * It’s 9 percent of the total water needed to end the California drought, according to NASA (which reported in December that the state has a water deficit of 11 trillion gallons). * It’s about 40 million swimming pools and 24 billion baths. * It’s about equal to the capacity of Florida’s vast Lake Okeechobee.

~ Source

Recent storms have made Lake Michigan rise 5 inches in a week. That's an insane amount of water. Again, trillions of gallons.

Nature can really turn on the spigot when it wants to.