TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: MetalThunder

That doesn't mean there's a theme. It's like Seinfeld. Interesting crap about nothing.

a reply to: queenofswords

They have been for awhile and before them yahoo

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Good God, the “Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act” Sounds like we would do the same thing as China and Russia in "POPULATIONS SUSCEPTIBLE TO FOREIGN MANIPULATION".

and the use of covert or clandestine special operators and agents to influence targeted populations and governments in order to coordinate and shape the development of tactics, techniques, and procedures to expose and refute foreign misinformation and disinformation and proactively promote fact-based narratives and policies to audiences outside the United States.

Bravo! Hope you are proud.

"proactively promote fact-based narratives" Uh, no facts, but fact based stories. The amount of f(*&%ng bs verbiage to justifying enslaving the population is mind boggling. 100's of millions of words creating millions of laws, all subject to interpretation.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Then you described the whole internet

I say shut it down

What would we all do then ?

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: crankyoldman

I like your idea of reading some posts backwards, you mentioned that before right?

A couple of friends here suggested it

It's a weird intuitive thing, not sure why they stuck out but they did.

a reply to: queenofswords

Just like Skeptic Overlord. His playground his rules.
Should they just allow it to happen again?

a reply to: NotAShill

Oh. That's what I thought.
The answer is 37.

a reply to: Sillyolme

so it was all just "hearsay"? I see. So nothing to show where she has been listed or even treated as a witness? Just speculation because she spoke with mueller? By that reasoning, jr. & others would also be "witnesses" and should not be having contact with trump...... hmmmm.

thanks,

a reply to: Sillyolme

I thought it was just a commercial

a reply to: Sillyolme

You seriously need to review the Mod's Warning posts. I'm dead serious with you.

Tonight's drops are more similar to those initial posts almost a year ago. Dare I say, classic Q?

On Patriots' Fight board to boot. After the tripcode change. I wonder if this is a new phase.

Just realized Q's ref to the Breitbart link is 4-months old.

a reply to: TomLawless

Yes it's "introduction" time for new eyes

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: WhatTheory

No sweety. It was about Russian adoptions remember? Well that was the first thing he said.
I know exactly what he said. He told three different stories as more information was revealed. We saw so much backpedaling the Mississippi ran backwards.
Maybe you choose to selectively remember just that version and that's your choice.
But reality is that was like the third version of what took place.

You need to review the history.
Donald Trump Jr admitted that he was meeting the Russian lawyer (remember that she was blocked from entering the US.... but was granted a temporary visa by the Obama Administration) to discuss her purported dirt that she had on Hillary. When they met, she only wanted to talk about adoption. It was a set up.