TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: crankyoldman

Brazile's drunken tweet may have contained a coded message.

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi

I'm not worried about the Midterm elections.

Seriously, have they put forth any ideas that will appeal to most Americans? All I hear about is crazy stuff, like abolishing ICE and raising taxes.

edit on 8/20/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)

a reply to: daskakik

Real researchers wouldn't have those minor mistakes.

But humans do.

Your picking of minor details doen't negate the whole, or make your point of view correct.

You can correct without conciet.

Your MO is to hang on the one word that is incorrect or attribute, often flimsy, analysis by other anons to Q as his words to try and disprove the Q posts, or do the same with analysis by others on this thread.

I think you're a decent doctor, but your bedside manner needs a little work.

I'll be more thorough in my next post knowing that one falce moove mai neggate awl tat iz sed in the pre-seeding paragrafs.

Be well, citizen.

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Even more hilarious is she failed to check the tweet for errors. Uber stupid.

...*cough* trump *cough*

i fear some of you have no perceptible sense of irony

[Clip-Quote]

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Stormy Daniels latest

This BBC article shows the theatrics that have been going on because Stormy was due to join this show for up to about 7 weeks.

He added: "When they discovered she was going to do her own thing and be herself, they refused to let her go on."

We will leave it to the imagination what "she was going to do her own thing and be herself" means !!! 😃

(((❌❌❌)))

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: crankyoldman

Brazile's drunken tweet may have contained a coded message.

... whiskey bourbon rum ...

💥🍸💥

originally posted by: CoramDeo
Your picking of minor details doen't negate the whole, or make your point of view correct.

Sometimes they are not minor details.

I mean saying people are being suicided with red scarves on doorknobs becase it is the same group sending a message and one of the two examples you give didn't involve a red scarf or a doorknob, then that is a big part of that particular claim.

Also, I'm pretty sure the conceit first showed up when the title "researchers" was invoked, as if believing certain CTs automatically pushes you up in rank.

a reply to: daskakik

Eh, well, I'm not going to change your mind.

A discussion can only bear fruit if those involved in the discussion take the position of student during the discussion. If one or more of those involved in the discussion enters the converstion with the position of a teacher, then no one learns.

See, the big picture view is the suicides themselves, not the particular device used, or the color of the device. It's the mystery surrounding the deaths of these otherwise well-off and talented people that piques everyone's curiosity.

I'm not sure what a title of researcher has to do with a display of conciet, but I'm OK with that answer.

As a (terrible) "researcher" myself, I take the position of a student and observer, paint me however you'd like.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: crankyoldman
Pareidolia, also the links throw the whole thing off.

The links show the shock wave propagating.

Pareidolia? Lol.

P

a reply to: xuenchen

What do you make of this strange entry on the Wiki page that describes the FISA judge who approved the Carter Page spy warrant?

Judge Anne C. Conway approved a 2017 FISA Court warrant for Carter Page, a former adviser to the 2016 Trump Campaign. The warrant application was released publicly in July 2018, marking the first time FISA warrant application materials were made public.[4] The heavily-redacted, 412-page application cites many sources, including confidential informants. [5]

Among those many sources, the application cites the Steele dossier, leading former assistant US attorney and legal commentator Andrew McCarthy to write, in reference to the fact that the renewal submission contained unverified allegations, an idea he had previously considered “crazy” (“It turns out, however, that the crazies were right and I was wrong,“) that “the newly disclosed FISA applications are so shoddy that the judges who approved them ought to be asked some hard questions[6],” and “what happened here flouts rudimentary investigative standards.”[7]

Source: en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: carewemust

Seriously, have they put forth any ideas that will appeal to most Americans? All I hear about is crazy stuff, like abolishing ICE and raising taxes.

Some of the "liberal" voices are so maniacal I almost think they are controlled opposition to destroy the Democratic Party.

a reply to: carewemust

Looks like it was "rigged" with omitted facts like the fact "The Dossier" was funded by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

Other facts are also omitted.

In fact, the FBI "Investigations" were riddled with omitted and concealed facts. That's how they fixed it.

Rigged at the highest levels of the U.S. Government !!!

💥😁💥

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: carewemust

Seriously, have they put forth any ideas that will appeal to most Americans? All I hear about is crazy stuff, like abolishing ICE and raising taxes.

Some of the "liberal" voices are so maniacal I almost think they are controlled opposition to destroy the Democratic Party.

I reached a point in the Fall of 2016, where I was convinced that Trump was intentionally throwing the election to Hillary. He was making some (in my opinion) maniacal statements for a Presidential candidate. But, HE WON!

Maybe these liberal maniacs will resonate with enough voters to put some of them in the winner's circle in November?

a reply to: xuenchen


My guess is that FISA judge Anne Conway doesn't know that this Wiki page on her exists. That last paragraph makes her look like an incompetent dunce.

a reply to: Skyfloating

We know that both parties are controlled.

With all of the resignations and GOP 'retirements' ie, not standing for election, I have the feeling that the GOP is being cleaned out.

I think party politics is on its way out. Hopeful thinking perhaps.

It is such a great way of controlling what an entire party does.

Elected Officials are elected to serve the people ... and instead serve the Party. It does not take many embedded plants to achieve this.

P

originally posted by: CoramDeo
See, the big picture view is the suicides themselves, not the particular device used, or the color of the device.

How can it not be when it is specifically pointed out and made an important part of the discussion?

That is why I mentioned those dots. Because people say "coincidence?", well no , not if things didn't even happen that way.

I'm not sure what a title of researcher has to do with a display of conceit, but I'm OK with that answer.

The post I originally replied to asked "How does it feel to cherry pick minor mistakes of researchers", so when you brought up conceit I was just saying that the post I was replying to had its fair share.

As a (terrible) "researcher" myself, I take the position of a student and observer, paint me however you'd like.

Someone asked me what makes someone a "real" researcher. I gave a BS answer because I wasn't even sure what made the people's who's minor mistakes I was cherry picking researchers.

I used the term real researchers because I would think real researchers would double check their facts before offering what they have found.

I don't even consider myself a researcher, I'm a data fetcher.

Me: "Hm, I don't recall Bourdain being found with a red scarf hanging from a doorknob. Let me fetch that data".

And I share what I find.

a reply to: pheonix358

The shockwaves are traveling near the ground, around 6 lines below the links and to the bottom. The links are half way up the plume and reach out way too far but hey, if it's what you see, there is a name for that.

a reply to: carewemust

Looking at the page, it actually sounds like someone, whoever wrote the page, is trying to put her down for failing to know the doc and info was fake.

She was an advisor to the Trump campaign, but at the moment with the info given, she could have thought she was doing the right thing. Consider the info that was left out.

Most of those were signed before the info came out about abuse.

Seems there would be more to her bio than just that one point.

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: carewemust

Looking at the page, it actually sounds like someone, whoever wrote the page, is trying to put her down for failing to know the doc and info was fake.

She was an advisor to the Trump campaign, but at the moment with the info given, she could have thought she was doing the right thing. Consider the info that was left out.

Most of those were signed before the info came out about abuse.

Seems there would be more to her bio than just that one point.

You may be confusing the confusing wording in that wiki.

I think the "Adviser" they refer to is Carter Page.

Judge Conway approved a 2017 FISA Court warrant for Carter Page, a former adviser to the 2016 Trump Campaign.

Also I love this IRONY:

Other service
Conway serves on the board of advisers for the Center for Governmental Responsibility at the University of Florida.

😃😃

Anne C. Conway