TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: IAMTAT

I think that means PlayStation PS.

a reply to: daskakik

I will honestly paypal you $1,000.00 if it's Pamphlet. In whatever currency you need.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

I was gonna let someone else break it to him.

Ahem so Brennan lost his clearance and your almost think it'd be big news here. Biden is stomping his feet about it so that's good.

Seems like a mini nuke went off on this board though.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New crumb #1890

qmap.pub...

So Peter Strzok communicated through XBOX chat?
Interesting.

Xbox chat? They have everything, everything? Gee, even my HS transcripts?

originally posted by: EbbNFlow
Ahem so Brennan lost his clearance and your almost think it'd be big news here. Biden is stomping his feet about it so that's good.

Seems like a mini nuke went off on this board though.

Q 1884 caused it.

Funny on Brennen claims his ability to "freedom of speech" seemed to have been attached to his Security Clearance. Poor baby.

a reply to: Sabrechucker


I was just listening to Sara Carter on the Hannity radio show. She's awesome. Scheduled to deliver some big Spygate-related news on the Sean Hannity TV show tonight.

a reply to: TomLawless

Of course. Could you be a bit more specific in which theory?
I have numerous thoughts and it does change daily based on what information I come across.

I'm currently really debating the validity of Q's last few months.

Q asking the MSM media to ask about Q seems to be a big mistake. It wasn't ready. Why did Q pick 8, for its research? But 8 is horrendous at getting its info outside of its own board. Its a disgusting place full of wonderful minds.

Q was posting "crumbs" basically talking points and interesting topics for research. Great, many people blew it wide open and tons of things came to light(although the light didn't reach far). But Q's predictions have been a mistake, it gave people something to debunk when we all know predicting dates is a risky business as so much could change. Q's religious angle is also divisive to me.

But really it would be best if you ask me a question, otherwise my rambling thoughts I'll end up arguing with myself for post after post.


One thing I do know is how to muddy the waters. I've seen it done so many times. How many 9/11 threads get ended early despite valid questions. Look how UFO/Alien matters have been a source of humiliation for years... they are ahead of the curve. Flat ear.... no I can't defend that one. One armed man storms a pizza parlor and that gives them a reason to sweep everything in the trash.

Infiltrate the story, plant the seeds, get the discussion going and then you control the labels. Q suddenly becomes a religious cult. They will link it to predictions of raptures and world ending. Q is anon, general public doesn't know how anons work. MSM will use the anon spam/trash to devalue the content.


Urhg, I don't think I answered your questions.

I'm here because 8 isn't working, there is so much information there but it never gets out. ATS is more relatable to general public, but this thread seems to be moving towards being 8-lite. People are copying their language, meme'ing, videos, generally nonsense posts and whooping. So much content is being lost.

Why today? Everyone starts one day. I hate how this place has become purely pro/anti-Trump, both sides don't even bother now. Thread titles, thread content mean nothing. Its just both sides spewing the same hate to each other.

twitter.com...
Rasmussen Reports
‏
Verified account

@Rasmussen_Poll
Follow Follow @Rasmussen_Poll
More
Today’s @realDonaldTrump approval ratings among black voters: 36%

This day last year: 19%


-- 36-19=17--

a reply to: crankyoldman


I question the wiseness of revoking Brennan's clearance before he's put under criminal investigation. The optics (to the general public) of doing it right now are bad.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
Dbl

Probably.
Or...maybe both.

a reply to: carewemust

I'll check it out, Hannity is the last MSM member I will listen too. I'd love to have a few with him, and hear what he want's to say.

a reply to: cameralens86

Pamphlet, his wife and an inner circle of benefactors are Q, some of whom got tired of lying to the public, tired of playing the LARP game and attempted to expose the whole thing as the fraud it is. It's infuriating. I hate liars and cons.

a reply to: Sabrechucker


The President's approval rating among Black voters on election day 2016 was just 9%. 9% to 36% is quite a jump. And well-deserved too. Obama's 94% approval was FAKE.

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
Start a Q Fail's Site, see how it look's against Q proofs. Check's and Balances.

I shouldn't have to. One solid fail is all it should take. I'll give you a pretty big one.

On Oct 28 2017 at 3:45 EST Q confirmed someone's post about HRC being arrested an hour and a half later, at 5:16 EST, Q wrote "HRC detained, not arrested (yet)". At that time HRC was at an event scheduled for 5:00PM and she was the special guest speaker.

When exactly did Q team detain her? Seems like Q had no idea that she was at a public event at the time and that there was no way to detain her without people noticing but here we are.

a reply to: cameralens86

That's exactly what I hoped for when I asked.

I wanted you to let it all out, brother (I think). You seemed like you had a lot to get off your chest.

I'm going to address your post more thoroughly when I'm finished closing up. My kitchen help is on vacation this week, so I'm doing it all back here right now.

In short though, you've addressed many of my concerns as well, but it's so hard to talk about them. I'm an enthusiast, but I've got doubts. I've always had doubts.

What keeps sucking us back in?


Okay. I've got specific questions to ask you later. Hopefully you'll be around.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: crankyoldman

I question the wiseness of revoking Brennan's clearance before he's put under criminal investigation. The optics (to the general public) of doing it right now are bad.

Sounds like Brennan was consistently insubordinate. I think the American public understands what that is and that it can't be allowed with respect to the President.

a reply to: carewemust

I am starting to wonder if Trump knows these people are
going to get some kind of a hail mary pass on all of this.

That would prompt him into this maybe?

I for one am tired of seeing these crooks skate
off with just a loss of a .Gov job. The double
standard is just too much, it has to stop somewhere.

Just my 2 cents, I have had it today with the American
hating Dem's and socialists.

a reply to: Sabrechucker


I like Hannity's zeal, focus, and accuracy of findings by his guests (like Sara Carter and John Solomon), over the past 3 years of focusing on the Help Hillary/Hurt Trump scandal(s).

a reply to: TomLawless

Aren't we all Q.

I think Pamphlet had involvement in it, at some points at least. But I think his information comes from other sources.

Remember Tracy Beanz already told POTUS she was Q.