TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SplinterSequence

Maybe one day we'll learn how 40,000 feet ties in to E.T.. Not computing for me right now.

I know one thing...if Q drags ET into this NOW...he might as well also throw in Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster...because the Q train will come to a screeching halt.

Remember...Q says "Keep your eyes on the ball"...and for now, at least, the ball appears to be down here on earth.

100% agree. Only way he could introduce it is to start asking some questions about the space force and unaccounted for government spending.

Any talk of ET involvement kills this whole thing in a moment. While all of that is plausible to anyone who has spent time on the subject - it’s not ready for mass consumption - and the masses need to be willing to think about the questions Q is posing.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: carewemust

And more good news for Republicans. DNC Co-Chair/Congressman Keith Ellison (who beats women) was just elected as Minnesota's next Attorney General, of all things.
www.foxnews.com...

It was nice to Fox touch on the alleged Ellison video tonight.

The alert from FOX 2 days ago is why I started this www.abovetopsecret.com... thread on Ellison. I don't think any of the big liberal outlets have reported on the accusations against him.

a reply to: EnigmaChaser

It wasn't Q who said all that. Who was it?

a reply to: carewemust

That"s one of the biggest problems in a nutshell

Disney Imagineering executive ID’d as pilot killed in plane crash near 5 Freeway

www.mercurynews.com... =true

Disney is going down. Literally.

a reply to: Aallanon

replied via pm.

a reply to: Aallanon

I wish I could. I guess I am just posting out loud and hoping someone can make some sense of it for me too.

I posted quite a few pages back about MEMO.

Acronym Definition
MEMO Memorandum
MEMO Medicines Monitoring Unit (University of Dundee)
MEMO Medical Equipment Management Office
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Only
MEMO Mission-Essential Maintenance Operations
MEMO Mental Modeler (Cognitive Technologies, Inc.)

What is Mental Modeler?

Mental Modeler is modeling software that helps individuals and communities capture their knowledge in a standardized format that can be used for scenario analysis.

Why was it developed?

Mental Modeler was developed to support group decision-making, allowing users to collaboratively represent and test their assumptions about a system in "real time". Additionally, it has also been applied as a social science research tool to measure the individual or shared 'mental models' that often underlie human decision-making.

link to what MEMO is

I typed it into the Q search tab on the Q site. When I did it returned 4 drops that contained the word MEMO in all caps. If you click on the Q link I just provided the 1st drop that comes up does not contain the word MEMO in it at all.

Q !4pRcUA0lBE No.78 📁
May 11 2018 00:11:07 (EST)
Facebook is listening to you 24/7/365.
Literally.
[F9 algorithm]
Are they recording/safe-housing?
Metadata collection?
Building 8.
DARPA.
[CHINA-CHINA-CHINA]
Q

Drop 563 is what turned me on to this. Q says "think MEMO" so I did using Rel's acronym logic. That is what I found.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Great find TOL!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: FlyingFox
Why go after the investigators, and not the guy who is accusing Bill Clinton of raping him? Seems that the Clintons would go straight to the source.

Possibly, to send a message.

a reply to: Spruce

We traded nothing. Control was taken from us long ago.

On the contrary, we cede control and give away our freedoms, and personal information, thoughts, and beliefs in forums just like this one, and through the every day use of technology within the bounds of the fourth amendment. We also give the government the power to collect and analyze in the name of security. Duely elected, for the most part.

In the case of Wilkes v. Wood (1763), Parliamentarian John Wilkes was suspected of seditious libel against King George III for a series of pamphlets that were published and distributed which criticized the King. The British Secretary of State, Lord Halifax, issued a general warrant which named no suspects, but gave officials blanket authority to ransack the homes of potential suspects and seize any “seditious or treasonous papers” and to arrest the authors. After his arrest, Wilkes brought trespass charges against the officials who had ransacked his home and was subsequently awarded monetary damages against the officers and separately, Lord Halifax. In ruling on the case, Judge Pratt cited that what was at issue was the delegated discretionary power given to offices, under general warrant, to go wherever their suspicions take them and to search using whatever means necessary, thereby subverting the liberty of those who are the target of said search (Ku, 2010, pp. 655-66). The decision laid the groundwork for the wording used, and the intention behind, the limitations placed on government when conducting searches of private residences and personal effects.
The importance of reason, checks and balances, and limitation on government authority can be seen in the specific wording of the Fourth Amendment:

"The rights of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by an oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Const. amend. IV)."

The wording “…and no warrants shall issue, but…” are placed specifically in front of the prerequisites specifying the place to be searched and what will be searched for, with oversight by the judicial branch regarding the reasonableness of the search. (Amar, 1994, p.774). Ku also adds that the Fourth Amendment should not be considered in isolation, but as something that compliments other constitutional protections against unlimited, arbitrary governmental power (Ku, 2010, p. 648). Given that the US Constitution enables us to check the powers of government and determine how much privacy will be afforded to individuals, the onus then is on us to strike a balance between what we consider private, and what we consider a necessary intrusion to ensure security. In many ways it appears that this concept is foreign to may people when it comes to personal privacy.

The problem is, we blast information all over the place for any one to hear, including government agents. We have no reaonable expectation of privacy when we are broadcasting outside the walls of our own private residence.

One principle that defines what can reasonably be expected to be considered private in relation to what people do in their homes rests on the doctrine of public exposure. The doctrine, in simple terms, says that what a person does that is observable from outside the home cannot reasonably be intended to be private (Penney, 2007, p.483). Application of this principle is seen in the case of Smith v. Maryland...

The line of demarcation established in Smith v. Maryland is an inside versus outside view of privacy, which brings to life the James Otis’ criticism of the Writs of Assistance, and that one’s home is his castle. The case law supports the idea that a man’s home is his castle, and that he is protected within it as long as he is quiet. The word “quiet” holds true in Smith v. Maryland in that the suspect transmitted incriminating information to a third party, the phone company, which had every right to record that information, if it chose to do so, in the course of conducting normal business with the suspect (Ku, 2010, pp. 877-78). The underlying philosophy is one of inside versus outside, or of transmitting and revealing what goes on inside the house to any outside party versus acting quietly inside one’s home. Courts have argued in that what is broadcast by an individual to the public from inside one’s home cannot be assumed to be private. The introduction of a third party, whether a phone company or a cable Internet provider, assumes the person sending the information knows that it can be seen, heard, or recorded by that third party (Penny, 2007, p.486). This clashes with how people think about the technology used on a daily basis.

Q is correct in saying, "WE LET THIS HAPPEN ".

I have more.

Source: "Ceding Privacy", Me, 2010, unpublished in a public forum.

If someone wants the whole thing, PM me. I'll put it in a public place as a pdf.

a reply to: wanderingconfusion


I just mean that sentence. are the anons making it happen?

I am trying to figure out how the anons who are mirroring the drops for these sites are making this happen.

originally posted by: dashen

Bruh, dig my ATS ads

I like to wake up around 11am, so...night shift?

Maybe I'm old, or have a particular type....but I think Michelle Bachman is kind of hot.



She doesn't seem like the sort of woman who would have anything to do with a Bill Maher, who is decidedly not classy.

www.dailymotion.com...

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: EnigmaChaser

It wasn't Q who said all that. Who was it?

Another post earlier in the thread was noting a possible ET connection.

Q has said nothing about any of that. My point was it should stay that way unless there is a good reason not to.

a reply to: EnigmaChaser

Seems like a really relevant drop from the past.

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ No.462 📁
Mar 27 2018 23:03:07 (EST)
Why did Kim travel to China?
Why was travel impossible in the past?
What changed?
What constitutes the need for a F2F meeting v. secured call?
What US publicly traded co. previously entered N. Korea to establish comms?
Think logically.
WHY DID GOOG VISIT N KOREA?
WHY WOULD THE FORMER CHAIRMAN & CEO [HIMSELF] OF GOOG/ALPHABET PERSONALLY ATTEND?
Who is Sergey Brin?
Where was Sergey born?
Track the 'FAMILY' - IMPORTANT.
Think COLD WAR.
Think KGB.
US, China, N Korea [3].
FACEBOOK data dump?
Who made it public?
Who sold shares -30 days from announcement?
You can't imagine the magnitude of this.
Constitutional CRISIS.
Twitter coming soon.
GOOG coming soon.
AMAZON coming soon.
MICROSOFT coming soon.
+12
Current censorship all relates to push for power [mid-terms].
LAST STAND.
Election FRAUD cases OPEN - DOJ [many].
Follow the FAMILY.
Follow resignations [Business/Gov't].
BIDEN/CHINA VERY IMPORTANT MARKER.
Who made it public?
Who really made it public?
Who is making it all public?
WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.
U1>CAN>EU>RUSSIA>IRAN>NK>SYRIA>PAK>>>
IRAN NEXT.
$700B - MILITARY [THIS YEAR].
WHY IS THE MILITARY SO IMPORTANT?
RE_READ ALL.
NATIONAL SECURITY.
NATIONAL SECURITY.
These people are STUPID.
Art of the Deal.
TIDAL WAVE INCOMING.
BUCKLE UP.
Q

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

aaaaand new Q

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f074d6 No.2606371 📁
Aug 14 2018 23:05:27 (EST)
www.foxnews.com...📁
House of GOD?
Only the beginning.
Those who you are taught to trust the most….
Expect MANY MANY MANY similar reports to surface from around the world.
IT GOES A LOT DEEPER.
Connected.
The choice to know will be yours
Q

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

originally posted by: EnigmaChaser

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: EnigmaChaser

It wasn't Q who said all that. Who was it?

Another post earlier in the thread was noting a possible ET connection.

Q has said nothing about any of that. My point was it should stay that way unless there is a good reason not to.

I agree. The mentioning of extraterrestrials will make a laughing stock out of Q and their followers. MSM would have a hayday with it, and it will definitely be lumped into the fringe conspiracies more so than it already is.

Strange for ABC's Britt Hume to TWEET this...
twitter.com...

a reply to: imthegoat


When Q stated today that even the "autists" can't comprehend what's really happening behind the scenes, it seemed he was alluding to some kind of E.T. connection, but the time isn't right for revealing it. Big fish to fry, in the here and now.