It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
maybe that's why the anti Q oppose him so much, they are part of that evil
Long story.
It all comes from within. I don't know how to put it any other way. Let me try to explain.
The CIA is heavily compartmentalized. Each compartment having its own mission, but completely ignorant as to what is going on in the next office. Compartmentalization, or the concept, is what actually is used to deceive the true patriots in its ranks. NO OUTSIDE COMM, outside that compartment.
The world has always been "Compartmentalized". Or at least the last 10,000 years. Information being kept from mankind at large, and possessed by small groups of individuals, secret societies, allowing those groups to control more and more of mankind.
Obviously, if the control mechanisms of those groups were to be made public then it would be logical for those controllers to try and fix the fault, in their view. But always, with inside information. They always seem to know what the good guys are going to do, and why?
Well, being a psychological control system, and you already know one day someone will tell the truth, you must control that. In other words, control the opposition. We have seen that in operation with stings and plants. Look deeper.
Why was the CIA created in the first place? And, why is it still there?? Is there really any denying how evil and corrupt that institution has become? The corruption that comes from within.
I have no knowledge, direct knowledge, if the NSA operates on compartmentalization as does the CIA. But because of the nature of their mission, I would make the unsafe assumption that they do not. It is logical to assume that since the NSA's mission is to gather "ALL" information, they have seen it all, to include what even the patriots of the CIA have not. Is it a safe assumption to say that all NSA members are patriots? No, not safe at all.
I can not go into the Q question. Something inside me says its thin Ice, very thin ice. But, if you were to ask me, can the Q be completely trusted? I would answer, no. All things are susceptible to internal infection. Even, AI!
We all suffer a internal battle of one type or another. We all have that angel, and demon, on our shoulders. For me? The demon starved to death many years ago lol lol lol.
The only thing that is true when it comes to evil is it requires, concealment. The truth requires none. All for Q, and Q for all? Sounds good.
Then these words come to mind about being open and honest.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
John F. Kennedy Speeches The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961
Wartime secrecy does in fact play a role, but what does it really do when the very instrument of truth, the msm/press have been infiltrated and controlled by the very enemy you fight? Internal corruption again.
Before you start looking for the "Anti", look to ones self, group, society, and start there. In order to know who "They" are, you have to know who "You" are, first.
Evil to one, is grace to another. Evil is, as evil does...
Oh, one other thing. My mind, belongs to me!!! Can all here, say that?
Evil, is definitely at play!
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
Bill Mayer and his Q monologue.
Ask yourself, all for a LARP?
I watched the whole episode tonight and what struck me was the disorganized and struggling points from the dems on what platform they are running on.
Of course there are no clips of that part on Youtube😏
There isn't one. The only coherent point was...strengthening borders lolzzz.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: tiredoflooking
nice hood.
he probably wore it to the last snctvm perv party.
and again.
Real Time with Bill Maher is brought to you by KID LOVE PRODUCTIONS.
cheeky monkey
originally posted by: imthegoat
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: tiredoflooking
nice hood.
he probably wore it to the last snctvm perv party.
and again.
Real Time with Bill Maher is brought to you by KID LOVE PRODUCTIONS.
cheeky monkey
Sad part is that Bill Maher seemed more along the lines of libertarian back in the early days of the show. It didnt start to get really bad until he donated that million to Obama in 2012.
Trump sues Maher for $5 million for orangutan sex joke
...Maher said--that he would donate $5 million to a charity if Trump could prove he wasn't the "the spawn of his mother having sex with an orangutan." "I'm not saying it's true," Maher told Jay Leno on "The Tonight Show" last month.
"I hope it's not true, but unless he comes up with proof ... I'm willing to offer $5 million to Donald Trump that he can donate to a charity of his choice -- Hair Club for Men; The Institute for Incorrigible Douche-bag-ery. Whatever charity."
Trump says he provided Maher with a New York birth certificate that proved he didn't descend from an ape -- but Maher hasn't paid up.
Trump filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles on Monday.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Maher's Trump hate goes back to, at least, 2013...
Maher picked the figure after Trump, long a skeptic of President Barack Obama's citizenship, offered to give $5 million to the charity of Obama's choice if the president publicly released his college transcripts in addition to his passport records ahead of last year's elections.
Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.