TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

if they have the servers we should know soon right?

also there may not be any good data on them at this point

Is Hannity's tick tick tonight or was it last night. If last night what was it? Shockingly to some here, I don't watch much Fox, except for Tucker.
I like him even though he picks lightweights to debate with.

Does anyone else think that crazy Cathy on his show is just paid to act like that?

originally posted by: toysforadults

so one of the anon's must be watching someone inside one of the regulatory commissions or middle manning their e-mails or other methods of communication

Recently FB announced that Russians had 32 pages rigging our next round of voting. This is because white hats have access to "their platforms" think social media. Russia collusion or Social Media collusion? In one of the early threads here we nailed down their capabilities.

They can no longer sell our information or use it against us. Also recently NSA deleted nearly 1/2 trillion phone/text records?

A few pages back it was mentioned here how this SITE helped following Q. This is what it's all about I am truly grateful you and others will be able to seek truths and make the connections. On the left side of page are some features which will help you along the way as you can see the "players" status in image above. As well a great feature is to search keywords from all drops. Make sure to hit "reset."

Another AMAZING resource for those trying to catch-up or have access to everything Q. Pinned at top of page are several downloads to Q cheat sheet.

Happy to be here with you all!

originally posted by: pavil
Is Hannity's tick tick tonight or was it last night. If last night what was it? Shockingly to some here, I don't watch much Fox, except for Tucker.
I like him even though he picks lightweights to debate with.

Does anyone else think that crazy Cathy on his show is just paid to act like that?

On radio today H said it was regarding the un-redacted FISA docs/combined with new email evidence that will come out next week.

I’m still catching up on page 8 of this thread but I’d like to offer some sincere advice for those that are just learning about this ‘rouge’ Q phenomenon from main stream media and looking for more information.
0. Remember that although this whole notion of a Q anon group wasn’t something you even know existed until this past week, never mind read up on, this is something that patriots on this site have put blood, sweat and tears into researching for for many long months. So when you come on here and post without doing even the simplest of effort to read what has been painstakingly indexed for you here then yes, some of these people are going to be incensed by any New comers mean spirited comments, demands for proof or silly questions that could be learned through minimal efforts on your part. How about an analogy to compare , say you’ve spent 25 years of your adult life working as an auto mechanic- you even spend time after work getting beers, shooting the sh@t with other auto mechanic friends sharing ideas and collaborating on difficult or complex issues you’ve encountered - then for whatever reason (maybe you pissed off or helped out a notable figure that publicly mentioned your place by name) you’ve got people coming in your shop wanting to meet you, ask questions, get information- and instead of asking kindly or requesting direction, they start telling you what you SHOULD be doing on the car(s) you’re already working on, or start criticizing your methods and work outcomes when they have literally no experience or a lick of knowledge about automobiles. Wouldn’t you, as the mechanic, get a tad bristled and off put? Wouldn’t it be justified if you lost your cool or told one of these naysayers or lazy folk to piss off? So please please before you post, take the time to look through the wealth of material offered by Dash’s introduction at the very least. After that, if you need clarity, direction or want to know something you can’t find then ask away! The researchers on these threads and fellow patriots will be happy to help!
0. Before you jump the gun to grace us with your truly enlightened opinion of Q or the researchers on this thread- or before you read the infighting or distractions as indicative of Q- take a moment, wait- bite your tongue for a bit. Read the exchanges here. If you can’t follow along with the info right away that’s okay - follow the posters - read the comments for what they are worth. Learn the patterns of those in THIS THREAD - it won’t take you long before you’re able to spot posters that provide substance and add to each others information and those that merely say things to divide, provoke anger or have designs to lead you astray in ill intent and malfeasance.
0. I am NOT in any way, close to the caliper of the greats on these threads- I am merely a lurker that’s been following for awhile. I’m hardly able to read through all the info never mind contribute much substance- but I have a sincere and deep appreciation and respect for those that do. If I can offer little else I can at least offer you my own advice for what that is worth, but having people post comments that are vile or condemn good people on here, well that’s not something I enjoy - these people deserve respect, as much, if not more, than you deserve to know about this movement- so humble yourself a tad. I have and do and it’s offered me so much personal insight it’d be tough to recount.
0. My path here on this board was not something I sought out to find. On the contrary, I even remain skeptical of POTUS angel at times - this might draw stiff inhalation of breathes for some, but that’s okay. Skepticism is what keeps my mind active and allows me to justify the times I feel a surety about people and issues. The point I’m trying to make is that no one here can tell you for certain beyond any doubt who Q is or who to follow or what to believe so if that’s what you’re after then you probably shouldn’t be on a conspiracy site lol. What I CAN tell you is that I have gained an appreciation and belief in our commander and chief now through Q more than in light of all he’s accomplished that IS known and (hesitantly reported on by msm) What I can tell you with conviction is that in all the years I’ve been on ATS, studying politics and exploring information of all kinds, I have NEVER known a more beautiful collaboration of people all pooling information and supporting one another than I have on this site and in the name of Q. So please keep this in mind moving forward. This will help your search as this is the actual spirit and driving force of Q phenomenon- it is a community in a quest for the goodness of mankind and INDIVIDUALS and their empowerment as they search for the truth.

originally posted by: toysforadults
if they have the servers we should know soon right?

also there may not be any good data on them at this point

TFA,

The issue is not the servers themselves. The NSA had/has all the data, and I think per Q, so does apple cloud services = VERY illegal given what is on them (SAP programs no one is suppose to have at all, let alone in a bathroom).

The issue is they need someone to verify the server and the information on it. To do all this "by the book" they need the server to be evidence, and they need a guy, like Awan, to say, "uh huh, that's the exact server, those are my passwords, that's the SAP program I put on it..." Then the game is over.

Lisa Page said the chinese hacked the server, it has been said by FBIanon/Binney that they know who did what because the NSA grabs every bit of data going in and out of the US. So, they know it was hacked, they know by who, and likely the reasons, they know where the server was: now they need a eyeball witness.

a reply to: nowayreally

"What I can tell you with conviction is that in all the years I’ve been on ATS, studying politics and exploring information of all kinds, I have NEVER known a more beautiful collaboration of people all pooling information and supporting one another than I have on this site and in the name of Q."

NWR,

Well said.

a reply to: nowayreally

The attack on this POTUS is relentless, that in itself should alarm everyone on Earth.

This type of constant, in your face, non stop campaign s how third world countries are over thrown.

That is what gives Q credibility. At least credible to consider, the consequences of just ignoring it.

You "deplorable" Still makes me cringe.

a reply to: nowayreally

That was so sincere, thoughtful and beautifully put.
Thank you for understanding the time and dedication put into these threads by so many.

a reply to: nowayreally

You talkin to me...

It really bothers me when i see things like the so called missile launch in alaska that was just a helicopter and it shows up in a thread where someone is leaking info from the highest sources and add in the whole stouffers stove top stuffing thread linked... It makes me wonder very much and that has nothing to do with my respect for members hard work.

However i do see some valid info and the op is outta site with the amount of info and a job well done as i said

hook line and sinker..not me...i am not that easy

anywho your post showed up in my responses ...where there is a will there is a way

a reply to: crankyoldman

ooooo right I remember the case precedence being set on that a long time ago with regards on being able to prove weather someone actually sent the text or e-mail or not or weather they actually made the post or not

originally posted by: tjack
a reply to: NthOther

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Dude.
Nailed it.

mobile.twitter.com...

another member just made a thread about it... not sure if it was in here yet or not

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: crankyoldman

ooooo right I remember the case precedence being set on that a long time ago with regards on being able to prove weather someone actually sent the text or e-mail or not or weather they actually made the post or not

According to FBIanon (and others) her server and several others (confirmed by Rel's decode) had the SAP programs on them. It is a government program that no one is supposed to have, let alone on a home/bathroom computer. It's kind of a insta-death penalty thing if I remember correctly. Verification means game over for anyone who has it knowingly or not............

originally posted by: toysforadults
mobile.twitter.com...

another member just made a thread about it... not sure if it was in here yet or not

SERVER[S]

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: nowayreally

anywho your post showed up in my responses ...where there is a will there is a way

HTH,

If I can ask, can you elaborate on what this means exactly? I ask because often I don't get notified of a response, wonder if I'm doing something wrong on my end.

originally posted by: EbbNFlow

originally posted by: toysforadults
mobile.twitter.com...

another member just made a thread about it... not sure if it was in here yet or not

SERVER[S]

That document was in Q's last drop from the FOIA requires.

a reply to: crankyoldman

oh crap... hmmm

the accountability/ tractability of government functions I'm assuming is what that's about... guess she was selling access to the highest bidders?

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: crankyoldman

oh crap... hmmm

the accountability/ tractability of government functions I'm assuming is what that's about... guess she was selling access to the highest bidders?

a reply to: toysforadults

Well that’s a pretty big drop