It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tommy Robinson, the founder of the English Defence League, is to be freed from prison after the court of appeal ordered that he should be retried on a contempt of court charge.
He has been held at Onley jail near Rugby after receiving a 13-month sentence for breaches of reporting restrictions at Leeds and Canterbury crown courts.
At the court of appeal on Wednesday, the lord chief justice, Lord Burnett of Maldon, upheld the Canterbury ruling but said the ruling in Leeds was “flawed” and there should be a retrial.
Personally, i would have left him in gaol, but what does everyone else think?
I mean, it seemed a little off balance to jail him on a technicality
It’s a stupid law, and no one should be jailed for it.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Butterfinger
I mean, it seemed a little off balance to jail him on a technicality
He was jailed for contempt of court not a technicality.
He has been released on a technicality but will be retried.
a reply to: Words
It’s a stupid law, and no one should be jailed for it.
Then the court loses authority and the rule of law is undermined.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Boadicea
He was talking about rather more than just the shortcomings of the justice system.
Fact is he could have jeopardized a fair trial thus beasts and child rapists could still be walking our streets because of his actions.
The guy is a racist loon, gaol was the best place for him imho.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Words
Contempt of court may appear to be a stupid law, but imagine the chaos that would ensure without such laws?
Freedom of speech is one thing but there are limits to the madness normal people should be forced to endure.
Racist idiots like Robinson perfectly illustrate the point.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Boadicea
He committed a crime, a crime to which he pleaded guilty.
He was in danger of prejudicing a trial against a grooming gang and thus perverting the course of justice.
This could have led to at the very best a very expensive re-trial of the nonces or even total acquittal.
The severity of the punishment far exceeded the severity of his crime when judged against sentences given to other people for similar crimes and even worse.
It has been known for proven sex offenders to walk away free with just suspended sentences etc.
He did not deserve 13 months.
The media attention on Tommy Robinson has only served to deflect away from the fact that yet another grooming gang of people from a specific demographic in our society have been found guilty of sex offences against poor and vulnerable young, white girls.
We have a real problem with this yet no-one is prepared to stand up and publicly state that this problem is hugely disproportionate and we need to start addressing this as a matter of urgency.
I wonder if this would be treat with more urgency if the victims came from nice middle-class backgrounds in the Home Counties etc.