Could Saturn's Bizarre Moons Actually Be ET Spacecraft?

originally posted by: Zeta Reticuli
Luna is just the Spanish translation of Moon. So it doesn't count. If true, that's just pure laziness.

In ancient Roman religion and myth, Luna is the divine embodiment of the Moon (Latin luna; cf. English "lunar"). She is often presented as the female complement of the Sun (Sol) conceived of as a god.

Wiki

Harte

originally posted by: TurbineJet

originally posted by: Quadlink
I believe it is all electrical in nature...

Electrical and something to do with sound frequencies perhaps?

TJ

Well, it IS atmosphere, and sound travels in atmosphere. Or in the case of that- half vitrified slop with less dense gas over the top. I wonder what sound *would* do in an atmosphere that dense. Or how loud it'd have to be- being it's a giant storm... goodbye eardrums...

Hexagons with straight lines do exist in nature,honeycombs(not just the cereal) and basalt columns,and as mentioned throughout space and other moons/planets. I was curious about what forces could contribute to formation of hexagons in nature and ran across this vid:

Perhaps some unseen force out there that embodies planetary objects on various scales? Little formations(tornado like) of bubble(like/shaped) energy, that vary in size and touches the surfaces as it moves or holds?
As for the vid, I would be curious as to what JimOberg or Phage gad to say about the the anomalies in early 72 pics, and perhaps the rest of the material presented.
Hmmm...

Also, on a purely playful speculative whim, if the moons were "crafts" or artificial, it does make sense that if they needed to be camouflaged, for whatever reason, a moon or asteroid would be suitable.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Osirisvset

Why is Earths moon the only moon in the Solar System without a name? Its just called " the moon", weird... 

It's not. It has a name and the name is Luna.

The name "Luna" is simply Latin for "Moon" so "the moon" does not have a special name at all. Osiris is right. It's the same with "Earth" which in Latin is "Terra."

originally posted by: waftist
Hexagons with straight lines do exist in nature,honeycombs(not just the cereal

) and basalt columns,and as mentioned throughout space and other moons/planets. I was curious about what forces could contribute to formation of hexagons in nature and ran across this vid:

Perhaps some unseen force out there that embodies planetary objects on various scales? Little formations(tornado like) of bubble(like/shaped) energy, that vary in size and touches the surfaces as it moves or holds?
As for the vid, I would be curious as to what JimOberg or Phage gad to say about the the anomalies in early 72 pics, and perhaps the rest of the material presented.
Hmmm...

Also, on a purely playful speculative whim, if the moons were "crafts" or artificial, it does make sense that if they needed to be camouflaged, for whatever reason, a moon or asteroid would be suitable.

Very interesting video, thanks for sharing! And yes I agree a Craft disguised as a Moon is genius.

TJ

Thanks for this enterprising post.
You are on the right mission to initiate awareness for the unnoticed members of our old solar system.

IAPETUS is truly fascinating!

Probe deeper.

Damn!

Alien staging ground!

We're doomed!

Doomed I say.

Run for the hills!

a reply to: TurbineJet

RV experiments data concludes, yes they are not all marked or counted by EA*RTH Intelligence with names for the masses. May have some data obtained on the Hazard ones?

Yes they are not all moons...
Good thread Op

a reply to: neo96

But running makes their dogs chase you

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
a reply to: neo96

But running makes their dogs chase you

Live,Repeat,Die.

Just kill the one that controls time.

originally posted by: Osirisvset
Quick slightly off topic question...
Why is Earths moon the only moon in the Solar System without a name? Its just called " the moon", weird...

learnedthis.com...

In the beginning, it was just called the Moon because they didn't know other such bodies existed outside our own.

Later it was called Luna after Galilei discovered other moons out there.

Sounds like the true name for our moon is Selene though, after the Greek moon goddess. The study of the moon's geology is called selenology.

Back to the OP: nice post indeed. Those oddly shaped moons are interesting and do indeed look like ships or at least disguised ones.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
a reply to: TurbineJet

RV experiments data concludes, yes they are not all marked or counted by EA*RTH Intelligence with names for the masses. May have some data obtained on the Hazard ones?

Yes they are not all moons...
Good thread Op

Could you share and elaborate on what you know of the "moons"?

TurbineJet

originally posted by: Subrosabelow

originally posted by: Osirisvset
Quick slightly off topic question...
Why is Earths moon the only moon in the Solar System without a name? Its just called " the moon", weird...

learnedthis.com...

In the beginning, it was just called the Moon because they didn't know other such bodies existed outside our own.

Later it was called Luna after Galilei discovered other moons out there.

Sounds like the true name for our moon is Selene though, after the Greek moon goddess. The study of the moon's geology is called selenology.

Back to the OP: nice post indeed. Those oddly shaped moons are interesting and do indeed look like ships or at least disguised ones.

Thanks! I do like the image analysis that is done on those saucer shaped moons. Definitely the official images are altered, blurred and airbrushed out. Such a shame, if only we had the real photos.

TurbineJet

a reply to: TurbineJet

The Hexagon is a very common shape in nature in Bee hives the honeycomb, Basalt Columns here in really simple terms.



As for the storms on Saturn they can have a very simple explanation.

Similar regular shapes were created in the laboratory when a circular tank of liquid was rotated at different speeds at its centre and periphery. The most common shape was six sided, but shapes with three to eight sides were also produced.

So different wind speeds is the most likely answer.

a reply to: TurbineJet

The old pictures have been altered blurred out conspiracy cliche, they could have just not released the pictures if they really want to hide something.

a reply to: wmd_2008

Yes there are static honeycomb shapes in naturally occurring. Could you show me an example of a naturally occurring spinning windy rotating Hexagonal Storm here on earth?

Would love to see it!!

TurbineJet

a reply to: TurbineJet


Conditions on Earth are not the same as a gas giant, compare APPLES with APPLES as they say

That's something conspiracist's conveniently forget.

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: TurbineJet

The old pictures have been altered blurred out conspiracy cliche, they could have just not released the pictures if they really want to hide something.

Oh its a conspiracy cliche? My-bad, I thought we were on a conspiracy website.

Also, I don't think your statement would hold any water. For example...Lets say amature astronomers are able to see one of Saturn's weird moons with a good telescope. If NASA released NO official photos of the weird moon, people would start to ask questions.

So they are in a way forced to release something that at least looks similar to what the general public is seeing thru the eyepiece of their home telescopes..

just my 2c

TJ

originally posted by: xconvoyx
Thanks for this enterprising post.
You are on the right mission to initiate awareness for the unnoticed members of our old solar system.

IAPETUS is truly fascinating!

Probe deeper.

Im trying. I cant do it all myself here...care to add anything interesting to this thread?

How about the fact that one of the Moons "Titan" is actually larger than the Planet Mercury??

TJ

originally posted by: TurbineJet

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: TurbineJet

The old pictures have been altered blurred out conspiracy cliche, they could have just not released the pictures if they really want to hide something.

Oh its a conspiracy cliche? My-bad, I thought we were on a conspiracy website.

Also, I don't think your statement would hold any water. For example...Lets say amature astronomers are able to see one of Saturn's weird moons with a good telescope. If NASA released NO official photos of the weird moon, people would start to ask questions.

So they are in a way forced to release something that at least looks similar to what the general public is seeing thru the eyepiece of their home telescopes..

just my 2c

TJ

It will be a long time for that to happen have a look at the best amateur pictures of Saturn never mind a Moon a fraction of the size.