Personal GPS Chip Voluntarilly?

originally posted by: projectvxn
This is very true. Which is honestly the nature of how the device works. But carrying something IN YOU for the sole purpose of lowjacking people is a but too much for me.

Just don't be a sheeple-snack and get one from us Masons because it means we're gonna carjack your liver at some point.

a reply to: schuyler

Short answer: Okay

a reply to: scraedtosleep

The technology only recently came about, at least in theory, if you were abducted and there was a chance to be saved, wouldn't having a way to find you be better than left for dead?

a reply to: TerryDon79

I suspect you are mistaken by that, I believe there is a way and it is being done by certain alphabet groups to spy, but I am talking about being kidnapped and /or lost or missing.

I don't have a cell phone with that technology and if I did it would be useless in the event I was abducted, most likely disabled or thrown away by the abductor. Even so, cell phones lose their charge and signal and if I was on a hike and fell down and got knocked out, I would sure like someone to find me.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Not everyone would know that you had one, only close relatives or spouses, if you have nothing to hide no reason to not have a way to be found in the event something bad happens. Nobody thinks it will happen to them or their family then it does and attitudes change.

Besides, if any agency wants to really spy on you, they do not need a GPS.

a reply to: spiritofsoul

Last post here until later, but I am kind of shocked that what I have seen is No. I personally, given the opportunity to have one with no medical concerns would have one implanted and it would not be located by anyone because it would be in my head. Hope I don't lose my head though! Lol. This was strictly a safety issue to me and I was sure there would be those that suggested the things they did, but I would rather be found than not, dead or alive.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Hope you never have to deal with anything that would require you being located. Privacy is an issue regardless.

a reply to: wtfatta

Cell phones are not guaranteed to work in any case. Removal would be difficult if implanted properly. Location data only applies if you have something that can be tracked. I would rather be found. It could be turned off if desired, at least in my theory of how the could be used. If not, I have nothing to hide.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Check, stay away from the Mason connection. I suspect it would not be necessary for them to use GPS tracking to get a liver.

a reply to: ketsuko

It is not a branding by any agency, it is a choice to have an implant for safety, anyway, if someone wants to spy on you they do not need a GPS.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Don't own one and not everyone does. Either way, if the signal is lost it won't matter.

a reply to: Chance321

This is not a government keeping eyes on people, this is for emergency safety issues. Privacy is an issue and so is freedom when it comes to surveillance or BIG BROTHER watching. I did think those to issues would be focused on, but since 9/11 we have all given up quite a bit of our freedom willingly. If the government wants to put implants in anyone there would be very little they could do stop it, nano technology exist that if they want to and might already be doing, could be included in various foods, it is a theory at least.

a reply to: rickymouse

Valid point, but there are many people that have surgical pins placed in various parts of the body without consequence, so this should not be an issue. For that matter, people will shove whatever vitamins and pills they want and years later find that they cause cancer. Ask any parent of an abducted child that has gone missing and never found if they wish they had a GPS tracker to find them.

a reply to: Nickn3

I am private too, but the GPS would only be needed for safety reasons, not to invade privacy. It only gives a location when needed to. If someone wants to spy on you they will do so without a GPS, but nobody that cares about you will be able to find you if necessary.

a reply to: theatreboy

Oh well DNA testing is way off this topic, but I agree, however, if I am traveling in a foreign country and get met with foul play, I want somebody to find me, dead or alive.

a reply to: Saiker
Everything we do leaves a footprint behind, debit cards, bank statements, internet usage, Cell phone records, but this is about being found or finding someone in need of help and unable to do anything, Cell phones do not always work, especially in abduction or falls from the trail, if I could have something that was safe to implant that could help find me, I do it. Their are other ways to be tracked, but they are easily dismantled or render inoperable.

a reply to: projectvxn

Lowjacking? What does that have to do with being located for safety purposes?

a reply to: worldstarcountry

Repeating another point, the cell phone does not always have a connection, and I do not own one, but even if I did I would still want a GPS tracker for me or my loved ones, so that I could find them and they could find me, if necessary, I hope they never and I never do. There are an abundance of people out there right now looking for their loved ones and I guarantee they wish they had a way to find them.

a reply to: blend57

There are ways to disconnect (in theory), but that would defeat the purpose, when you wish you had it will be when you least expect it.

a reply to: mysterioustranger

At least you recognize the benefit, and I get the Big Brother thing, but if they want and they already do, they can spy on you without a GPS. But if nobody knows where you are, they will not find you unless there is a specific way to do so and unless it is an implant it can be dismissed easily. Safety to me at least is more important than privacy becoming a problem.