White Helmets are terrorists, can choose surrender or death - Assad

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

LOL whatever!

Bye Felicia!

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Ohanka
Hopefully any country these monsters and criminals end up in sends them right back to Syria to face justice for their horrible crimes.

Assad is the righteous hero for gassing his own people, and the locals who try and rescue the wounded are the bad guys?

Man, I must have read the wrong bible.....

Yes. It makes a lot of sense for a man who is winning a war through normal, conventional means while maintaining the support of the majority of the people to start gassing random targets of no military importance whatsoever.

Of course it makes no sense for extremist terrorists who are losing to stage something they know will make ignorant dimwitted westerners scream for war on their behalf at all.

originally posted by: Ohanka

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Ohanka
Hopefully any country these monsters and criminals end up in sends them right back to Syria to face justice for their horrible crimes.

Assad is the righteous hero for gassing his own people, and the locals who try and rescue the wounded are the bad guys?

Man, I must have read the wrong bible.....

Yes. It makes a lot of sense for a man who is winning a war through normal, conventional means while maintaining the support of the majority of the people to start gassing random targets of no military importance whatsoever.

Of course it makes no sense for extremist terrorists who are losing to stage something they know will make ignorant dimwitted westerners scream for war on their behalf at all.

Except your sources of information that led you to that assumption are just as specious as any you'd claim I've been educated by.....

Your whole argument hinges on "the sources I've read are all 100% factual and correct, and the sources you've educated yourself with are all 100% incorrect, and I can prove it because I only read factual content"

It makes a TON of sense why a Dictator would want to root out hard to catch/find rebels with blanket chemical weapons that will easily get them no matter where they're hiding, and all without loosing any of his own troops in the process. Whats a few thousand innocent civilians to Assad (since they aren't anywhere as valuable to him as his troops)?

a reply to: Wayfarer

Your whole argument hinges on "the sources I've read are all 100% factual and correct, and the sources you've educated yourself with are all 100% incorrect, and I can prove it because I only read factual content" /ex]

Oh and where do you get these 100% factual and correct sources from. We are dying to know! LOL

a reply to: Wayfarer

Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite? I tell you what. If you answer this question I'll answer yours:

Why do you support intelligence reports/propaganda from Dictators rather than US specialists?

Really you are going to trust the intelligence from the largest corporate dictatorship in the world.

Shake and wake..!

a reply to: Wayfarer

It makes a TON of sense why a Dictator would want to root out hard to catch/find rebels with blanket chemical weapons that will easily get them no matter where they're hiding, and all without loosing any of his own troops in the process. Whats a few thousand innocent civilians to Assad (since they aren't anywhere as valuable to him as his troops)?

Incorrect son. Go and do some research. You where lied to about Iraq.. You where lied to about Afghanistan. You where lied to about Libya.

Some people are very gullible. You are one of those.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Wayfarer

It makes a TON of sense why a Dictator would want to root out hard to catch/find rebels with blanket chemical weapons that will easily get them no matter where they're hiding, and all without loosing any of his own troops in the process. Whats a few thousand innocent civilians to Assad (since they aren't anywhere as valuable to him as his troops)?

Incorrect son. Go and do some research. You where lied to about Iraq.. You where lied to about Afghanistan. You where lied to about Libya.

Some people are very gullible. You are one of those.

There is no point, believe me. This guy is a loss cause! Cannot even answer simple questions

Government pet!

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Wayfarer

Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite? I tell you what. If you answer this question I'll answer yours:

Why do you support intelligence reports/propaganda from Dictators rather than US specialists?

Really you are going to trust the intelligence from the largest corporate dictatorship in the world.

Shake and wake..!

Really you're going to trust intelligence from wackadoo youtube videos?

@ JayMorris

I use logic and Occam's razor as my guide, as opposed to crazy conspiracy theories...

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Wayfarer

It makes a TON of sense why a Dictator would want to root out hard to catch/find rebels with blanket chemical weapons that will easily get them no matter where they're hiding, and all without loosing any of his own troops in the process. Whats a few thousand innocent civilians to Assad (since they aren't anywhere as valuable to him as his troops)?

Incorrect son. Go and do some research. You where lied to about Iraq.. You where lied to about Afghanistan. You where lied to about Libya.

Some people are very gullible. You are one of those.

You are ignorant even of your own ignorance. You don't know what research I've done, you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya, and the only thing you've shown with your silly diatribe is you are allergic to logic/facts/reason or any kind of cognitive functioning that doesn't rely on pure CRAZY.

originally posted by: Jay-morris

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Wayfarer

It makes a TON of sense why a Dictator would want to root out hard to catch/find rebels with blanket chemical weapons that will easily get them no matter where they're hiding, and all without loosing any of his own troops in the process. Whats a few thousand innocent civilians to Assad (since they aren't anywhere as valuable to him as his troops)?

Incorrect son. Go and do some research. You where lied to about Iraq.. You where lied to about Afghanistan. You where lied to about Libya.

Some people are very gullible. You are one of those.

There is no point, believe me. This guy is a loss cause! Cannot even answer simple questions

Government pet!

Oh no, my poor feelings, a crazy person on the internet is upset at me! Boo Hoo!

Your feckless debate skills are a waste, you should hone your intellectual faculties before you try spouting BS next time.

a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

a reply to: Wayfarer

Really you're going to trust intelligence from wackadoo youtube videos?

Here you have made a misinformed presumption. One of many in this thread. You would be far better off asking questions and doing some reading. You one liners on a complex situation shows more about your limitations than the topic contained within the OP.

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

Sorry mate your trolling skills are low level. Go level up, Come back and try again.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Wayfarer

Really you're going to trust intelligence from wackadoo youtube videos?

Here you have made a misinformed presumption. One of many in this thread. You would be far better off asking questions and doing some reading. You one liners on a complex situation shows more about your limitations than the topic contained within the OP.

Nah, sorry brother, the only sources that corroborate yours and Jay's crazy vantage are dubious at best. Short of actual experience (which you don't have), or corroborating evidence from a white hat themselves, the most you can posit in your favor is hearsay and debatable youtube videos.

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

They are linked dummy, that is why i wanted your opinion on the ilegal Iraq war, and the ilegal Libya invasion, but you cannot even be honest with that.

You are not debating, you are trolling! You are backing up anything, not even telling us these so called 100% sources you talk about!
Absolutly clueless!

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

Sorry mate your trolling skills are low level. Go level up, Come back and try again.

A vacuous statement.

I'm sorry you're getting so upset.

originally posted by: Jay-morris

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

They are linked dummy, that is why i wanted your opinion on the ilegal Iraq war, and the ilegal Libya invasion, but you cannot even be honest with that.

You are not debating, you are trolling! You are backing up anything, not even telling us these so called 100% sources you talk about!
Absolutly clueless!

I'm not ever citing sources (those I referenced were yours). I'm saying even without sources its far more likely the White Helmets are not some nefarious shadow organization masquerading as a battlefield aid group but rather actual people seeing other people being injured/maimed/killed and wanting to go out and help them. Its a very human response, and therefore the more likely one.

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Wayfarer

you don't know my thoughts on Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya

Yeah because you won't say lol Great debating skills you have there lol You dodge every question and call everyone ignorant lol lol

Because this is a thread about Syria and the White Helmets you doof. I'm not so naive as to be misdirected because you don't have an adequate rebuttal.....

They are linked dummy, that is why i wanted your opinion on the ilegal Iraq war, and the ilegal Libya invasion, but you cannot even be honest with that.

You are not debating, you are trolling! You are backing up anything, not even telling us these so called 100% sources you talk about!
Absolutly clueless!

I'm not ever citing sources (those I referenced were yours). I'm saying even without sources its far more likely the White Helmets are not some nefarious shadow organization masquerading as a battlefield aid group but rather actual people seeing other people being injured/maimed/killed and wanting to go out and help them. Its a very human response, and therefore the more likely one.

Ok, do you remember when Footage showing White Helmets members removing a man's body following his execution by rebel militants made the news? I am sure you know about this already, so we know for a fact that some members were assisting the rebels. Rebels (terrorists) funded by the west, just like the white helmets.

And how about the member who was caught removing a man's body following his execution by rebel militants. All proper sources, as I am sure you know.

So, what does that tell you about the group? These are the ones we know about, God knows how many more of these things happend.