Feds Believe National Enquirer Publisher Acted as Political Supporter for Trump Campaign

a reply to: burdman30ott6

OR maybe those things aren't the same situation as what is going on here? Also, it took the Feds raiding Cohen's office and getting evidence from him to start looking into AMI.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Good luck sending all those links to the Feds. I'm sure those newspaper articles will go a long way to proving their guilt in a court of law.

If it's good enough for a FISA warrant.....

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burdman30ott6

OR maybe those things aren't the same situation as what is going on here? Also, it took the Feds raiding Cohen's office and getting evidence from him to start looking into AMI.

Cast a large enough net...

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Good luck sending all those links to the Feds. I'm sure those newspaper articles will go a long way to proving their guilt in a court of law.

If it's good enough for a FISA warrant.....

Give it a shot. Send those links to the Feds and see if a FISA warrant will be granted.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burdman30ott6

OR maybe those things aren't the same situation as what is going on here? Also, it took the Feds raiding Cohen's office and getting evidence from him to start looking into AMI.

Cast a large enough net...

Investigating additional crimes uncovered while executing a search warrant is police SOP.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Good luck sending all those links to the Feds. I'm sure those newspaper articles will go a long way to proving their guilt in a court of law.

If it's good enough for a FISA warrant.....

Give it a shot. Send those links to the Feds and see if a FISA warrant will be granted.

It would need to be a yahoo news link i'm afraid.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

How many police investigations benefit from having this wide open of a "warrant?"

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Hillary Clinton appears to be surviving that level of investigation and more.

Once again, slap on the wrist, or 10 years...She is the darling of the left. A darling in a way of lets say we change the narrative of an act to make it not a crime, lets over look things like hard drives cleaned, phones destroyed etc as examples...

All I see is a bunch of armchair lawyers who think they know how investigations work trying to interject their opinions on how the investigation should be handled based on information only released to the public.

Maybe, but does seem one sided...what do we do lets say in another year and we are at the same spot?

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Krazysh0t

They might want to be real careful here, as the decades long incestuousness between Democrats and the majority of the media, including fund raisers, buried stories, contributions, campaigning under the guise of "news", and quid-pro-quo "exclusive" interviews could very easily become fair game for investigations and exposures if they decide to get uppitty over this AMI/Trump connection.

Hasn't done old Hollywood much good with the @MeToo movement that kind of started out against the right with Trump vs Hillary and now has them eating themselves alive...

I could see this go the same way.

Trump has one Publisher in his cormer, Hillary has most all the rest of media Publisher's,news outlets, you name it...in her back pocket...This is rich.....?