Lisa Page told Congress that the Chinese (not Russians) stole Hillary's e-mails.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: Allaroundyou

The transfer speed was too fast to be remote....ie it had to be local, someone at the physical pc.

If you are going to hack remotely, you'd do the deed slowly under the radar so the speed bump isn't an anaomoly.

And it happened so early today! I learned something new Normally this only happens when I am home.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
I'm sure you probably already know, but this whole hacked by Russian's story is literally just phishing emails sent to the DNC. The DNC just wasn't smart enough to catch it and gave away their passwords. They basically fell for the oldest trick in the book.

I'm sure you probably already know that that is not the whole story.

You're right, the bigger story is the content that was released that hasn't been denied by the DNC.

Not even close.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

IF the hacking was a state actor, they'd have gotten more than DNC/Podesta emails.

Who says they didn't? They had to keep the juicy stuff under wraps so they could weaponize it should Clinton win the election.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: Allaroundyou

The transfer speed was too fast to be remote....ie it had to be local, someone at the physical pc.

If you are going to hack remotely, you'd do the deed slowly under the radar so the speed bump isn't an anaomoly.

And it happened so early today! I learned something new

Normally this only happens when I am home.

. There are some good threads on ATS about it from cyber forensic geeks and former Intel people. The evidence has not been refuted as far as I know.

Also in Nunez interview on Sunday with MB, he stated that Republicans were targeted with the same phishing attempts but that info was redacted in the indictment. Wonder why you make that kinda info vanish from a report that is supposed to be through?

a reply to: pavil

Also in Nunez interview on Sunday with MB, he stated that Republicans were targeted with the same phishing attempts but that info was redacted in the indictment. Wonder why you make that kinda info vanish from a report that is supposed to be through?

It is also supposed to be classified. Don't worry, when the Russians release the RNC emails the Republicans will declassify it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

True pundit makes stuff up.

Oh do they now?
Wouldn't be any of that going on here would there?

I don't know about them making stuff up. but they are sketchy.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

True pundit makes stuff up.
I seriously doubt this.
Seriously doubt it.

I do, too.

But man, it would be a helluva explosion if it were true. I don't think any amount of partisanship would ever allow the information to be made public, however, if it were.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: pavil

Also in Nunez interview on Sunday with MB, he stated that Republicans were targeted with the same phishing attempts but that info was redacted in the indictment. Wonder why you make that kinda info vanish from a report that is supposed to be through?

It is also supposed to be classified. Don't worry, when the Russians release the RNC emails the Republicans will declassify it.

We will see when it is released with no redactions.

Why would hacking Republicans by the same outfit and means be classified in your opinion?

Let's hear your rationale.

a reply to: pavil

Why would hacking Republicans by the same outfit and means be classified in your opinion?

Because the failure to release the stolen emails proves that the hackers were actively backing them and undercutting the other side.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Allaroundyou

Hillary's server has been penetrated by more people than Stormy Daniels in Trailer Trash Nurses 6.

HAHA that is gold! I like Trumps choice of woman normally but that one is nasty. If I was with him I would ask “why dude....why”.

Thanks.
...But you're being too hard on her (no pun intended).
Low budget, skin-flick actresses are the epitome of honesty and integrity.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: pavil

Why would hacking Republicans by the same outfit and means be classified in your opinion?

Because the failure to release the stolen emails proves that the hackers were actively backing them and undercutting the other side.

What? Or maybe Reupublicans dont fall for stupid phishing attemps, have weak passwords and have better cyber security than their Democratic rivals.
It wasnt the Republicans who redacted that bit. It's the Intelligence Community and the Mueller probe.

Why redact that "The Russians" tried to hack both Political Parties? That would seem to be a big deal to report, no?

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
I'm sure you probably already know, but this whole hacked by Russian's story is literally just phishing emails sent to the DNC. The DNC just wasn't smart enough to catch it and gave away their passwords. They basically fell for the oldest trick in the book.

I'm sure you probably already know that that is not the whole story.

You're right, the bigger story is the content that was released that hasn't been denied by the DNC.

Not even close.

Unsure how that is the bigger part of the story. Here is the other side of the story.

Robert Driscoll, a lawyer for Butina, denied in a written statement that she had been acting as a Russian agent. Driscoll said she had cooperated with Senate intelligence committee investigators and provided thousands of documents. He said the FBI executed a search warrant on her apartment in April.

"The substance of the charge in the complaint is overblown," Driscoll said. "While styled as some sort of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Agent Registration Act, in actuality, it describes a conspiracy to have a 'friendship dinner' at Bistro Bis with a group of Americans and Russians to discuss foreign relations between the two countries."

NPR

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Interesting date to arrest her......almost like they had a plan or something.....our leos wouldnt attempt to undercut a sitting potus while potus was discussing foreign affairs or national security issues would they?

a reply to: pavil

What? Or maybe Reupublicans dont fall for stupid phishing attemps, have weak passwords and have better cyber security than their Democratic rivals.

The implication was that the hacks were successful.

It wasnt the Republicans who redacted that bit. It's the Intelligence Community and the Mueller probe.

Was it? Where did you getbthat information?

Why redact that "The Russians" tried to hack both Political Parties? That would seem to be a big deal to report, no?

They are reporting that, just not sharing the details.

a reply to: Middleoftheroad


What do you expect her lawyer to say? "It's just the tip of the iceberg?"

a reply to: DJW001

Watch the Nunes interview with Maria Bartimatolo on CNBC this past Sunday.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: pavil

Why would hacking Republicans by the same outfit and means be classified in your opinion?

Because the failure to release the stolen emails proves that the hackers were actively backing them and undercutting the other side.

What? Or maybe Reupublicans dont fall for stupid phishing attemps, have weak passwords and have better cyber security than their Democratic rivals.
It wasnt the Republicans who redacted that bit. It's the Intelligence Community and the Mueller probe.

Why redact that "The Russians" tried to hack both Political Parties? That would seem to be a big deal to report, no?

Only reason that makes sense to me is, the DOJ/intelligence community redacted that part because it doesn't fit the narrative they're trying to sell.

It was noted by several people that yesterday Trump said "I have great faith in MY intelligence community." Many of us who follow the Q thread suspect that Trump relies heavily on military intelligence, and has little-to-no faith in the CIA and other "traditional" intelligence outlets.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

there are no msm reports

That's generally indicative that there may be some truth to it.

But, like you, I'm always skeptical about threads authored on the foundation of "True Pundit" articles, but I'm not as quick to dismiss it just yet. It's not as if it's a completely impossible scenario--the Chinese have been hacking us since hacking was a thing.