Mueller Indicts 12 For Russian Hacking

a reply to: theantediluvian

41. On or about June 15, 2016, the Conspirators logged into a Moscow-based server used and managed by Unit 74455 and, between 4:19 PM and 4:56 PM Moscow Standard Time, searched for certain words and phrases, including:

So you'd have us believe that Russia doesn't know how to spoof an ip?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: The GUT

PS I'm sure his advisors are telling him to cancel that meeting.

And he knew this before he left and still called it a witch hunt. Unbelievable.

How many witches have we netted now?

Dishonest of you and you know it , need to change the name from silly to sullied. It was a witch hunt in terms of trying to tie Trump to it.
Go ahead and carry the the torch for nanny pelosi and mad maxine you sound just like them.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Mueller was the first prosecutor (to my knowledge) that actually indicted the proverbial ham sandwich!

One of the companies he indicted didn't even exist during the time frame he alleged the crimes were committed

a reply to: Nyiah

What evidence?

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Xcathdra

There is no forensic evidence that shows a hack. However there is evidence that shows an internal file transfer and then a leak.

Imran Anwan.

Motive and opportunity.

Comey shutting down an immunity deal for assanges testimony on the leaks.
US governments refusal to interview kim dot com on seth rich.

a reply to: JBurns

A ham sandwich actually exists.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Xcathdra

Mueller was the first prosecutor (to my knowledge) that actually indicted the proverbial ham sandwich!

One of the companies he indicted didn't even exist during the time frame he alleged the crimes were committed

Its no coincidence this info was released the day after the disastrous strzok hearings.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: JBurns

A ham sandwich actually exists.

Excellent point sir

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Xcathdra

Mueller was the first prosecutor (to my knowledge) that actually indicted the proverbial ham sandwich!

One of the companies he indicted didn't even exist during the time frame he alleged the crimes were committed

Its no coincidence this info was released the day after the disastrous strzok hearings.

Say what!?!?

You mean the wheels of justice don't turn over within a day?

C'mon X.....

Thank God they hacked. They should be made honorary US patriots. They brought the DNCs dirty little secrets to the light of day, like DWS making sure Bernie Sanders would never sniff the nomination, Donna Brazile feeding CNN debate questions to Hill, Podesta and company dislike of Catholics, to name a few. And to think the alternative was morally superior to Trump.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Kharron

There wasn't anyone "falling" for anything.

In case you missed it, the emails they leaked were factually true.

If you guys can't stand having your dirty laundry exposed, I don't know what to tell you. Make better choices, or stop associating with people who excuse violence with questions like "But what did he SAY to deserve that violent attack?"

Oh I get it. You're trying to twist this around because you were one of the ones re-posting Russian interference, right?

a reply to: Sillyolme
I listened to that little Pr#$ck, and he said that the GRU group passed it on to Guccifer.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Proof?
You are jumping to conclusions

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Xcathdra

Mueller was the first prosecutor (to my knowledge) that actually indicted the proverbial ham sandwich!

One of the companies he indicted didn't even exist during the time frame he alleged the crimes were committed

Its no coincidence this info was released the day after the disastrous strzok hearings.

Say what!?!?

You mean the wheels of justice don't turn over within a day?

C'mon X.....

lol I mean the charges are bs and will not ever see the inside of a courtroom so the claims made, like a hack, will never have to be supported by the SC.

These throw away indictments are being used to distract from the strzok hearing and nothing more.

a reply to: Xcathdra

There is no forensic evidence that shows a hack. However there is evidence that shows an internal file transfer and then a leak.

There are mountains of just publicly available forensic evidence of the hack. You either choose to ignore it or you don't know enough to consider it.

I've already addressed the "Forensicator" analysis. It does not in fact prove what you mistakenly believe it does.

Not to be rude but you really have no idea what you're talking about.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

What's he going to do? "Ask" him about it again? He should be telling him not asking anything. Strength remember?

so we just "tell" everyone in the world what to do now?
mkay
guess joe and mika havent told you that part yet?


www.govtech.com...

Top Ten Hacking Countries 1. China 41 percent (of the world's attack traffic) 2. U.S. 10 percent 3. Turkey 4.7 percent 4. Russia 4.3 percent 5. Taiwan 3.7 percent 6. Brazil 3.3 percent 7. Romania 2.8 percent 8. India 2.3 percent 9. Italy 1.6 percent 10. Hungary 1.4 percent

If you are actually serious about this threat there are 2 other countries identified as more active than rushya.
Funny how you haven't said a peep about them.

a reply to: theantediluvian

You must be happier than a slug in a saucer full of beer.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Xcathdra

Mueller was the first prosecutor (to my knowledge) that actually indicted the proverbial ham sandwich!

One of the companies he indicted didn't even exist during the time frame he alleged the crimes were committed

Its no coincidence this info was released the day after the disastrous strzok hearings.

Actually, I think the goal is to have it posted before Trump meets Putin.

Kind of like, "We know what you did. Don't think you can make some deals with Putin to get out of it."

Like a warning shot. That's just what it feels like, we'll see.

originally posted by: oloufo
a reply to: theantediluvian

of course, the russians tried to sabotage the election. trumpsters are either blind or plain stupid to dont see whats going on. everything is working fine for putin and friends. trump is spreading chaos, he tries to weaken the european union, and thats exactly what putin wants. take a look at putins actions in the last decade, his connections to criminals and his agenda, and you will understand whats happening here. not the russians are our enemies, putin and his friends are. he is a clever guy, speaks well german, seems to be a nice guy, but, he was an agb agent, he has learned how to manipulate people, and trump is a perfect victim.

It is Trump who is forcing Germany to buy billions of dollars in Russian Natural gas which will bolster the Russian economy and negate any sanctions placed on Russia?

It is Trump who is refusing to pay a fair share to NATOs defence budget to protect the EU from Russia? It is Trump who has been pushing for Brexit?

The EU is doing a fine job without the help of Trump to weaken and destroy the EU.

Anyone who can't see this are either blind or plain stupid to what's going on.