It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Must be collusion between Mueller and UK government... within an hour both give press release making Putin more difficult for POTUS:
BBC Article - Novichok bottle found
Scientists at the Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory are still trying to establish whether the Novichok found at Mr Rowley's house came from the same batch of Novichok that contaminated Sergei and Yulia Skripal in March.
Fox - Meuller 12 Russian indictments
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
Q
Been thinking a lot about this post (sorry if already covered) this obviously alludes to military tribunals. MIB (not will and Tommy lee) Military Intelligence Bureau. They do have a photo in front of hanger 17. Would they handle anything regarding U1? I cant think out of all the crimes anything that would trump that re NAT SEC
originally posted by: SplinterSequence
Read the actual 12 russian indictments. [RR] was forced to confirm that the DNC server was not actually hacked but 1000's of moronic politicians on both sides got spearfished. Furthermore he had to admit that no votes were changed and all attempts of influencing the election were unsuccesful. This kills the muh illegitimate president Trump narrative completely. Also the indictments do not mention russian collusion at all. Something huge went down behind the scenes and now they had no choice to tell the american people. Checkmate!
I know this because I know who did it and why
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: TheGOAT
Here is a description of the group that performed analysis on the "hack" that was a LEAK.
www.dailymail.co.uk...
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: crankyoldman
Cranky, New member, I've thoroughly enjoyed your insight.
It is very complex and i don't understand the entire process. I do agree that bringing up the big fish at this point would probably cause riots. Is this what Q alluded to when he said why was AWAN only charged with bank fraud? would say a damning testimony from him on his superiors be enough to take it to the next level? I want people to face justice not slander, so I agree it has to be done perfectly. like most of us I just don't understand the endgame..guess that's a good thing