TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: Whereismypassword

Now THAT'S what I call a conspiracy!

a reply to: Whereismypassword

"Q" does sound like a communistic social-revolution, "Where we go one we go all" sounds very collectivist/Communist

originally posted by: eisegesis
Not acknowledging the change does not mean that "nothing changed", and repeating your opinion does not make it true. You must not be privy to all the details, or lack the ability to comprehend when change occurs.

I guess it depends on what change you are speaking about.

"New boss, just as bad as the old boss but in a different way" is a change with "nothing really changing".

ETA: Being purposefully vague because only time will tell and we don't currently have the benefit of hindsight.

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: Whereismypassword

"Q" does sound like a communistic social-revolution, "Where we go one we go all" sounds very collectivist/Communist

Da, pravda, pravda. We are all Social Democrats.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Or could be the 3 musketeers!

excerpt

post 15

Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No.147434025 📁
Oct 31 2017 22:00:47 (EST)

Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

So, Putin is controlled by the Three Families... but now he is an ally?

a reply to: Whereismypassword

simple.wikipedia.org...

"The Moral Code was written at the 22nd Congress of the CPSU in 1961. It was part of the third CPSU Program, which was a plan for how to make the entire Soviet Union communist as part of the new Party Programme.[1]

Some popular Soviet cliches are written in the Code. In fact, the Code was written to include special phrases, either invented by Soviet thinkers, or borrowed. (For example, the famous quote "'One for all, and all for one" ("каждый за всех, все за одного") was taken from The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas, père.)"

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: CoramDeo

People use statements such as that to "confirm" 'Q"...

also, we have posted many things that have been Q falsifying things, making false statements, and failed predictions

People have also used stetements like that, which have yet to happen, as proof that Q is wrong, a LARP, a fraud, etc.

In both cases, for the critic and the believer, they are looking in the wrong direction.

From my own observations, Q posts, others interpret, and rarely does Q directly confirm that the interpretation of said post or posts is correct.

For the most part, we're not privy to the actual interpretation or the timing, it's just a best-guess based on circumstantial evidence.

So, when someone jumps out and say Q was wrong, lying, etc., they need to seperate out whether it is Q who was wrong, or was the interpretation of what Q posted, wrong.

Important distinction, IMO.

EDT: I'm going to the gym now, be back later.

a reply to: Whereismypassword

Thanks for posting Lionel did well.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Bravo, very well done

a reply to: Whereismypassword

I've been thinking Whereismypassword; we all need to thank you and daskakik, me ol' Silly et al!

Q is starting to become more mainstream and I expect deep state will, at some point, push the agenda that POTUS must be releasing classified information through Q to us.

Should they try that, your disprovals, dismissals and ridicule of our conclusions can be used by POTUS/Q to invoke plausible deniability.

Good job and thanks!

a reply to: CoramDeo

Sure, and that is what we have been saying this entire topic, "Q" uses Cold reading tactics, open statements that can go either way, and confirms things *after* they happen, or takes credit for things after they happen, earlier "Q" predicted things, and when none of them came true they switched styles quickly

also by saying "I will be posting disinformation" when something doesn't go right they can fall back on that

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

That’s very sweet of you, and you didn’t use a code to say it!

I’m impressed

a reply to: crankyoldman

I like the way the news stories are aligned to the resignations! Good dashboard design too!!

a reply to: dashen

Aqualung at the ready... but on a serious note Dashen, we need to be ready to download and archive/backup EVERYTHING as soon as it starts to FLOOD!!!

We may only get a few hours before someone tries to push a killswitch on the net!

a reply to: XAnarchistX

This is great Q has succeeded were Lenin and Trotsky failed in creating a free and open collective community!

Remember reality and the narrative don't match. Throwing crap at the wall when the wind blows fails....

Proof of point.....

Mueller taking his time and knowing that the POTUS in anyway was part of or conspired with a known foriegn nation has to be ludicrous by any Russia yeller's standard. After all, Mueller is going to get him. It destroys your narrative, unless of course.... Mueller is a RUSSIAN

Is that the hail Mary we get to look forward to ?

Fantasy and divisive ..... We are on to you

Now carry on .....

a reply to: Madrusa

Trotsky didn't fail. Stalin had him ice picked in Mexico before he could bring glory to Russia.
Probably would have failed anyway though.
Communists always forget that people need food to live

a reply to: dashen

Maybe you're right and that's why Q decided to post on a National Socialist board instead...