TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

nvm

a reply to: EbbNFlow

oh I totally agree. I read his wiki and checked him out on linkedin he has worked on the most high profile cases around

a reply to: toysforadults

I didnt understand Q's CF or SA mention there. A live feed from Clinton Foundation or Saudi Arabia of MA in California? Why would they be surveiling him?

Q# 1767

A minor Cranky rant.

This post refers to the beginning of the media Q articles. This one by Ms Wong, who I know nothing about, is an abomination. I am beyond intolerant of the "hey this is what you need to know" and "oh, what's it all about" and "gee, is it really a thing?"

This style of "writing" which is said to be journalism - bad blogging is all it is, is an embarrassment. Her cutesy instagram bullet points is appalling...... I've wasted enough time on Ms. Wong - Q team owes me again..........

Sadly this is where we are headed folks so get comfortable with it. We KNEW the NK deal was in play 6 months before it happened, and while the MSM kept saying "nukes nukes SF kids are going to die...." We followed the information, learned the process, understood the reasoning and laughed when rubber faced Clapper said, "trump can't meet with Kim alone, it's not allowed, they both need to send a rep". It took a lot to go through that. We will not ever seen a detailed explanation with in a media outlet about this - ever. And Cranky's esoteric version will never ever be covered at all.

Rant over.

originally posted by: EbbNFlow
a reply to: toysforadults

MA is being supported by the Deep State. He himself is an operative. Lawyer is his cover with a developed backstory.

He seems such a tool though. I mean that in a foolish way.

a reply to: pavil

Hmm

Well. If he is being surveiled by whqts that Mossad group called.. Black cube something?

That would be pretty wild for Q to know who it is anc hack their phone

I would need more proof

Also bluejacking requires to be close to the phone

Not directly mentioned by Q-Research, but worth reposting and thinking about:

It started with 30 dead holistic doctors or something and has, since 2016, been updated to a list of 90 dead holistic doctors while Snopes is still trying to debunk that anything out of the ordinary is happening here.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: EbbNFlow
a reply to: toysforadults

MA is being supported by the Deep State. He himself is an operative. Lawyer is his cover with a developed backstory.

He seems such a tool though. I mean that is a foolish way.

Because he's by and large out of his environment. Alan Dershowitz called him out on TV about not understanding the actual laws let alone ethics. Now imagine him saying that in "lawyer speak".

Fake it until you make it:

a reply to: pavil

www.blackcube.com...

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Q# 1767

A minor Cranky rant.

This post refers to the beginning of the media Q articles. This one by Ms Wong, who I know nothing about, is an abomination. I am beyond intolerant of the "hey this is what you need to know" and "oh, what's it all about" and "gee, is it really a thing?"

This style of "writing" which is said to be journalism - bad blogging is all it is, is an embarrassment. Her cutesy instagram bullet points is appalling...... I've wasted enough time on Ms. Wong - Q team owes me again..........

Sadly this is where we are headed folks so get comfortable with it. We KNEW the NK deal was in play 6 months before it happened, and while the MSM kept saying "nukes nukes SF kids are going to die...." We followed the information, learned the process, understood the reasoning and laughed when rubber faced Clapper said, "trump can't meet with Kim alone, it's not allowed, they both need to send a rep". It took a lot to go through that. We will not ever seen a detailed explanation with in a media outlet about this - ever. And Cranky's esoteric version will never ever be covered at all.

Rant over.

What ever happened to just grunting and exchanging meaningful glances...whilst rocking on the porch...and breathing in the satisfying irony...over good whiskey? Maybe we need some sammiches now!

originally posted by: crankyoldman
This one by Ms Wong, who I know nothing about, is an abomination. I am beyond intolerant of the "hey this is what you need to know" and "oh, what's it all about" and "gee, is it really a thing?"

You really nailed what these low-IQ "journalists" sound like.

originally posted by: SplinterSequence

originally posted by: toysforadults
you guys catch the latest drops?

very interesting...

Q is claiming they hacked the phones of one of the associates working at MA's office, I wouldn't be surprised... they probably have bluetooth enabled..

CF had unlimited access to classified intel through FusionGPS. The FISA memo that Q linked to earlier details the unauthorized access and it had the NSA very concerned. MA also still owes a lot of money to very powerful people and Alaweed bailed him out once but he is no longer in a position to protect him anymore. Q team hijacked bad actors phone and send the picture to 8Chan to spread it far and wide. MA is now aware that his handlers are under surveillance and unfortunately for him these people prefer to stay anonymous. MA has now two new serious problems to deal with. He will soon learn what the difference is between a real shark and someone who just pretends to be a shark.

SS,

The esoteric aspect is rather funny to me. The system that has worked for ages has a pattern. Scandal is one of course. They been using these things over and over again and they worked before, but with the consciousness changes the last year these things fail to stick yet they try over and over again. Definition of insanity: your empire crumbles but you use the same tools in the hopes they work.

That's the real pain, if you tune in you can hear the screams once coming from us, coming from them as they have nothing of substance anymore. It looks so silly with ones Q shades on.

The Korean Peninsula is blowing up. WAAAARRRR!!!! I tell Ya!

Uhhh....Not so fast.

twitter.com...

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


I know you're in the UK, yes this is how the other side thinks. We no longer have news organizations, we have "opinion orators". Animal Farm bleating sheep trying to convince us all what the truth is. I trust the BBC and the Daily Mail over my own news organizations.

originally posted by: Enderdog

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Q# 1767

A minor Cranky rant.

This post refers to the beginning of the media Q articles. This one by Ms Wong, who I know nothing about, is an abomination. I am beyond intolerant of the "hey this is what you need to know" and "oh, what's it all about" and "gee, is it really a thing?"

This style of "writing" which is said to be journalism - bad blogging is all it is, is an embarrassment. Her cutesy instagram bullet points is appalling...... I've wasted enough time on Ms. Wong - Q team owes me again..........

Sadly this is where we are headed folks so get comfortable with it. We KNEW the NK deal was in play 6 months before it happened, and while the MSM kept saying "nukes nukes SF kids are going to die...." We followed the information, learned the process, understood the reasoning and laughed when rubber faced Clapper said, "trump can't meet with Kim alone, it's not allowed, they both need to send a rep". It took a lot to go through that. We will not ever seen a detailed explanation with in a media outlet about this - ever. And Cranky's esoteric version will never ever be covered at all.

Rant over.

What ever happened to just grunting and exchanging meaningful glances...whilst rocking on the porch...and breathing in the satisfying irony...over good whiskey? Maybe we need some sammiches now!

Edog, you hit it there. They gave us language and while I love crafting a good laugh or story as much as anything on earth, it is a burden to "speak" instead of connect. The Q thing, as I mentioned often, is a feeling. Not words, and sharing the feeling is amazing. The feeling from seeing Kim smile was (no words....)

a reply to: Sabrechucker

.
Sabrechucker said:

“I think The 2 main points Q is trying to drive home for NOW, is trafficking and 911.
Their are things way beyond the spectrum of those 2 things, which will come in time.“

Yes, I think it is a good idea to try to keep the big picture in mind, focused on areas where research can be effective.

Individual incidents can be debated either way, and while they may be very important incidents, no one of them will make or break the big picture.

Spygate, based on false dossier and bogus FISA

Conspiracy amongst factions of certain agencies and DNC/HRC to
undermine election

The various servers and their contents

Actions of BHO HRC and others against US interests, such as U1, Clinton Foundation crimes

Widespread, deeply rooted, connected instances of human trafficking

Collection and sale of personal information with potential for blackmail

As an average person, all these things seem pretty real and undeniable to me, regardless of whether individual Q drops are true or false. Research in these areas will be fruitful, Q or no Q. That is what the debunkers that argue individual specifics never address.
.

originally posted by: EbbNFlow

originally posted by: toysforadults

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Q Post #1767 up on qntmpkts.keybase.pub:

I find it very dubious that they are making a big deal out of some random picture post by anon's on 4chan and getting police involved. it's a guy walking down the street in a very busy place right near south coast plaza

could be anybody or there may have been real threats or Avenatti knows other people are after him

Think about it from a different perspective. What if MA was a spook?

Who is supplying the FEED?
CF
SA

Real time or a delay?

I've thought that for some time.

Re: Q Post #1766 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub:


I noticed that its:

A MARKER post 15 minutes after #1765 - meaning IMPORTANT in relation to the FAR PAST.


ETA- tired and misinterpreted 1766 for 1776... removed irrelevant bits.

a reply to: pavil

I think it means they're feeding him. Money.

I think. No way to know. It'll probably need to play out longer before we can make a better guess.

a reply to: cimmerius

Fantastic.