TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: dashen

Yes, the 'spin' is inconclusive. I don't fall for anything, yet I find myself drawn to it. Why? I ask myself that question constantly.

a reply to: CanadianMason

FWIW, CM, I love your style and didn't think for a second to checka-you-out! Nothing "off" about you to me at all, just the opposite, in fact.

The thread just feels like it's gone into hyper-bury-something mode again and I wonder what it could be.

Hey, maybe that strange code posted earlier (about the time the burying started) is a key for unlocking messages in dropped pictures!

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, and first hand material is best.

Rothschild Bank caught up in money-laundering scandal

According to the regulator, both Rothschild Bank AG and Rothschild Trust AG failed to check where assets from a client came from. The firms reportedly disregarded signs that the funds could be connected to money-laundering and took the money anyway. The companies run by the Rothschild family are also accused of reporting on the issue too late.

An investigation into alleged illegal practices by 1Malaysia Development Berhad was launched as early as in 2011. Top management of the institution is under suspicion for reported embezzlement of funds designated for state economic development projects. The FBI joined the case three years ago with investigators from Hong Kong, Singapore, Luxembourg, the UAE, the Seychelles and Australia also involved.

linky

a reply to: Trillium

I think the main storm will arrive while the house is on its summer break the next 5 weeks.

originally posted by: dashen
Yes you linked the original posts and interspersed your opinion of his motivation.
Are you a mind reader?
Have you got this all figured out?

Opinion?

What was said in the drops is in plain text. No mind reading or decoding required.

a reply to: queenofswords

Yeah its Q he just tried to pull the fake image again and then switched the meaning once it was quickly dismissed.

a reply to: daskakik

He's right dash, I was able to easily read his opinion without any decoding whatsoever. Ur pwned.

a reply to: tjack

Damn.
I got served in front of G-d the internet and everybody.
feelsbadman.png

a reply to: PokeyJoe

But it has been shown that they have failed predictions, photoshopped images, and false information

Has "Q" ever talked about "Resorts International"

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: IAMTAT

If the improvement you were looking for involved blindly believing what people post then sadly no.

So R is fake because Q said so... what else did Q tell you to think?

TBH I wasn't looking for anything from you, beyond why you were banned from ATS.
Sorry. I'm just not that into you.

Regarding R...
As a courtesy...I gave you, verbatim, the subject of this thread's very specific statement in answer to your question.

What you chose to do with it was entirely up to you.
Juvenile mocking of it and me was the expected response.

...So neither surprise, nor disappointment on my part.

You gave Q's opinion as your own opinion on R. Interesting.
Have you tried forming your own thoughts yet? Maybe reading past what Q tells you to think, come to your own conclusion.

As for your first question, perhaps people like Lurk can enlighten you as to why I was gone. "leave Q alone"


For those actually interested in the subject, take a look at Q's post on Sarah Silvermans image... look how they have handle it being questioned. The trick, much like cold reading, is to have an out... always. If the image was shopped then the message was something else to do with the image (something not mentioned when the image was posted). If the image shows incorrect information then its disinfo and needed. Q waits for the reaction before revealing the purpose.

a reply to: CanadianMason

Do you mean that you're thinking about drawing the conclusion that Q is fake because previous, similar cases have turned out to be fakes? Sorry, I don't totally understand the theorem.

I think someone should analyze Q's posting mathematically, statistically. Try to see what patterns can be found in the timing and content of posts. Maybe try to find several different patterns to indicate different posters. But I'm not sure if there are enough posts for that. Maybe.

a reply to: dashen

Everyone eat a lot of fiber too

I'm just jealous because I can't meme. And I'm not even a leftist. (I think... maybe in some ways I am.)

a reply to: Cutepants

I wasn't talking about you.

How can you not like memes?

a reply to: tjack

I'm not sure why I've embarked on the Q train other than to say I find it all to be an intriguing mystery-puzzle, and I'm a sucker. I can't wait until I can piece it all together with Baye's Theorum. Plugging the existant data into it should yield some interesting probability curves.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

Oh maaan.

Are u Ranon?

a reply to: XAnarchistX

failed predictions, photoshopped images, and false information

It would be useful to have a list of these versus Q "proofs" easily accessible for compilation and probability analasis purposes.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Wait.
Hold on a sec.
Ranon=RFK
Ranon=BMT
BMT=RFK?

a reply to: CanadianMason

sure, we have been posting throughout, but they get buried by the Soros's"Q" troll army

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Awesome projection.
A+
Stalin tier