It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That's a stupid reason to resign. Good business, and good product. People need to stop demanding no one offends them.
Agreed. Especially given the context of the conversation.
I can agree with that. Context is key in any situation.
In this situation, the context most important to the shareholders and the company as a whole is that Schattner has become a liability. Though this isn't the first time he has left. He may come back to head the company once this has blown over.
He's left the company before?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
Sad day when simply stating historical facts forces a man to resign from his own company.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
Sad day when simply stating historical facts forces a man to resign from his own company.
Unless you're a token liberal, then you can say that word all you want.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
Sad day when simply stating historical facts forces a man to resign from his own company.
Unless you're a token liberal, then you can say that word all you want.
The problem here is he was using it in a historical context, stating a true fact that a historical figure used the word, not slinging it around himself.
Jesus Christ to many Americans are thin skinned, reactionary morons anymore.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That's a stupid reason to resign. Good business, and good product. People need to stop demanding no one offends them.
Agreed. Especially given the context of the conversation.
Shares of Papa John’s soared 11% on Thursday after founder John Schnatter resigned as chairman of the board late the day before. The increase added $50 million to Schnatter’s net worth. He owns roughly 30% of Papa John’s stock and is worth an estimated $720 million overall. Earlier this week, Forbes revealed that Schnatter used the N-word and made other offensive comments on a call with a marketing firm in May. The call was intended to be a role-playing exercise in an effort to help Schnatter avoid future public-relations controversies. It ultimately generated the opposite effect.
so i think he may have even made money with this whole hubbub
Despite his resignation as chairman of Papa John's International Inc. (PZZA - Get Report) , founder John Schnatter will remain on the company's board, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Mr. Schnatter will remain on the Board," the filing said. Schnatter owns 29% of Papa John's shares, according to Bloomberg data. When considering why Schnatter was not removed from the board entirely, it's important to remember that shareholders pick directors, and shareholders have the power to remove directors, Professor Charles Elson, the director of the Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, told TheStreet in a phone interview. Notably, Schnatter is Papa John's largest shareholder with a 29.4% stake, according to FactSet. Schnatter stepped down as chairman on Wednesday, July 11, after he allegedly used a racial slur on a conference call. Schnatter compared his comment to Colonel Sanders using the n-word and he complained that Colonel Sanders never faced backlash, Forbes reported. "Directors can't remove directors," Elson said. "[Schnatter] didn't break the law; what he did was a bad thing -- you're talking about rude and distasteful conduct, but nothing against the law."