Hillary running for president in 2020 again...?

a reply to: xBWOMPx

Probably, but she alone could unite the left that appears to be splitting in two right now.

It's such an obvious choice. If it doesn't happen, the left will not regain the WH all things being equal.

originally posted by: darkuniverse
a reply to: xBWOMPx

The race war, is what Obama started. It is the NWO main playing card. Tear this country apart at the seams, and destroy it. Then build it the way you want it. Look like they are the saviors, and then all the promises they gave, renig on them. Then the liberals that fought for it, become slaves at their own game.

I see that in there future, no different then what Hitler did to Germany, He promised all kinds of public services and people LOVED it and fell for it then it quickly fell apart and Hitler didn't care about the people anymore once he got into power. the ONLY difference is Hitler tried to take on the world through military might, nwo and deep state are working from the inside out.

a reply to: loam

She probably could try to unite the left. But without a clear path, or a message, will be the same garbage regurgitated.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

The left reminds me of Hitler. The free healthcare, the lies they spew. But hopefully the military is smarter than that and fight against it, than just following orders.

originally posted by: darkuniverse
a reply to: xBWOMPx

The left reminds me of Hitler. The free healthcare, the lies they spew. But hopefully the military is smarter than that and fight against it, than just following orders.

I served 2003-2009 Todays military wont turn against the people but god knows about tomorrows military.

Hillary is attempting to become important again, so the next Dem nominee will seek her blessing. With Hillary it's always about power/ego/$$$.

a reply to: darkuniverse

BWAHAHAHA

according to Fox News..


Man people will believe any old nonsense they spout huh??

a reply to: xBWOMPx

I think, with the younger military, out with the old, they would turn against the people. If they got the old generals out. But I hope I am wrong.

a reply to: darkuniverse

Obama is no threat? I give you links showing Obama's current and ongoing political activism, and you declare he is "no threat"? Can't even acknowledge a teensy weensy possibility that he is any kind of "threat" at all? You somehow know that without any room for doubt whatsoever???

Okay. Apparently we have very different ideas of what a "threat" is, and I can only wonder if you don't consider Obama a threat because you like what he's doing... and Hillary is a threat to you because she's a threat to Obama.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I bet you listen to the Cartoon News Network don't you. Sucks your glass ceiling didn't break.

a reply to: xBWOMPx

Lol what a joke..


So are the “leftists” triggered snowflakes angry about micro aggressions or maurauding terrorists hell bent on civil war??


The narrative changes so much I get lost lol..


I have a hard time believing people who tell me one thing yesterday and another, totally contradictory thing tomorrow..

a reply to: Boadicea

I hated Obama. Yes, your right, I'm wrong. Obama is a threat to this country. He is a threat the the very survival of this nation.

a reply to: Lab4Us

I prefer to worry about the rise in “Democratic Socialists”, who are actual socialists hiding in Democratic Party clothing.

Yes... exactly.

And we should be looking squarely at Obama and his Organizing for Action minions for that. Not Hillary. She's been cut out. Starting with the Women's March on inauguration day...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

And if the Miltary is told that the US citizens are the threat, and we are the terrorists, then they would come for armed and unarmed americans.

a reply to: Boadicea

So true

a reply to: darkuniverse

She wouldn't run to win your vote.

The left would instantly fall in line. Thereafter it's a turnout numbers game.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xBWOMPx

Lol what a joke..


So are the “leftists” triggered snowflakes angry about micro aggressions or maurauding terrorists hell bent on civil war??


The narrative changes so much I get lost lol..


I have a hard time believing people who tell me one thing yesterday and another, totally contradictory thing tomorrow..

Ive never thought any different about dems/liberals/socialist, ive never said anything different either. They all want big government and no power to the people. As much as liberals dont like it the dems and republicans NEVER flip flopped after the civil war, Hitler DID create a socialist party and there is no difference between his or anybody elses it's ultimately BIG government controlling everything. I can hear your hysterical ridiculous angry laugh through your texting btw. Hitler was considered right because the communist party was left, the more extreme party is always left but it has NO relation to the right wing here! There was no republican party in Nazi germany, there was NO small government and power to the people in Nazi Germany!

a reply to: darkuniverse

Naw... not wrong exactly.... You were just still on your way to being completely right!

We're all a work in progress

a reply to: angeldoll

Or so it is to be most fervently hoped!!