It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At least 19 Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators are seeking to dissolve the agency, concerned that the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal migrants has limited their ability to pursue national security threats, child pornography and transnational crime.
In a letter sent last week to Kirstjen Nielsen, the homeland security secretary, the special agents proposed creating a stand-alone investigations unit and another agency to handle immigration detention and deportation. The request was sent as a growing number of Democrats and immigration-rights advocates have called for eliminating ICE.
The more than 6,000 special agents assigned to Homeland Security Investigations focus on money laundering, drug trafficking, human smuggling, child exploitation and cybercrimes. The agents have been involved in some of the highest-profile criminal investigations in recent years, including the takedown of the Silk Road website, an online market where illegal drugs and fake identifications were sold.
The agency was also involved in the arrest and capture of drug lord Joaquín Guzmán Loera, better known as “El Chapo, who led the Sinaloa cartel before he was extradited to the United States last year.
19 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have written a letter asking for the dissolution of their agency.
originally posted by: DAVID64
19 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have written a letter asking for the dissolution of their agency.
How about just fire their ass and replace them with people who will actually do the job they're hired for.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Kharron
You have to see the full letter to know what they are asking for. There is a lot of disinformation coming out from Anonymous sources.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DAVID64
Are they refusing to do their jobs?
Or do you miss the point?