Disgraced FBI Agent PETER STRZOK Subpoenaed to Appear B4 Congress on 6-27-2018 at 10am.

a reply to: carewemust

Of course they did.
Totally expected.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: carewemust

Of course they did.
Totally expected.

If you want to see an excerpt from this morning's testimony, check out message #1605 @ qanon.pub...

a reply to: carewemust

"Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover. I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today. I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish. We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I'm glad you retained counsel - you'll need one and hopefully they are very good."

originally posted by: carewemust
Dems blasted out of the testimony during a break, to share what they learned.
twitter.com...

Remember he wasn't under oath.

Perfect.

But we already know some of the points.

Q

a reply to: xuenchen


I hope these committees are coordinating what they learn with each other. Rosenstein's up tomorrow. I think it will be on live TV. He'll probably invoke the 5th, every few questions.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
Dems blasted out of the testimony during a break, to share what they learned.
twitter.com...

Remember he wasn't under oath.

Perfect.

But we already know some of the points.

Q

Dems defence - Strzok said he wasn't biased in his actions.
Case closed.

This may as well not have happened today.
SCOTUS retirement is the only news.
Guess there were no issues with his testimony.
Only the best intentions from this guy....

a reply to: UKTruth

That is an accusation, not a fact.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

That is an accusation, not a fact.

He stands accused of being biased and trying to rig an election.
The facts point to his guilt.
His denials are not going to get him very far.

a reply to: Sillyolme

do you even believe half the nonsense you spew - or do you literally come here and talk garbage just for the fun of it?

do you have people around in normal day to day life? I struggle to see how you would when you're a person of such substance.

a reply to: UKTruth

He stands accused of being biased and trying to rig an election.

Can you provide a link to his indictment?
The charges?

TESTIMONY SUMMARY IN A NUTSHELL:

Suffice to say it’s not a good look when lawyers representing the FBI are telling the central witness within a political conspiracy involving the FBI not to answer questions from congressional oversight.

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte tells Martha MacCallum that FBI lawyers are instructing FBI Agent Peter Strzok not to answer questions from congress about the nature of his involvement within a DOJ/FBI conspiracy to stop a political candidate; and later to overthrow a presidency.

Additionally Chairman Goodlatte states the answers agent Strzok did give about his text messages was “not believable”.

More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...

a reply to: UKTruth

He stands accused of being biased and trying to rig an election.

The committee is also biased, and has been proven to be covering up for Trump.

June 29, 2018

LEAKED:

Strzok was arrogant, defiant, and even laughed at some questions. A real A-hole. Also, it appears that NO transcripts of his testimony will be made public. (Maybe he cursed a lot?)

STORY: www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: carewemust
Those are bad things?
Good thing the president isn't arrogant or defiant or not an asshole.

a reply to: carewemust

Like the leaks supposedly coming from the IG earlier this month? The ones that didn't even reflect any content in the IG report? Is this leak like that one?
LOL.

When is Hillary getting locked up again?

a reply to: carewemust

The thread IQ just took a nose dive. Thanks for the quality content CWM.

a reply to: UKTruth

They said a lot of silly things. They got laughed at when they tried that with Rosenstein and Wray on Thursday.
Don't you guys realize that the conspiracy theories are laughed at? No I guess not.

a reply to: Sillyolme

No...the one you refer to with lynch is in the classified section as it pertains to an open investigation.