S.C. ROBERT MUELLER Files Court Complaint Against the FAKE NEWS Media.

a reply to: carewemust

You really cant make this stuff up ...I refuse to be saddened and so I will LOL I think it may be a plan to have us root for Muller ...What if he looses ? does that mean they could or would counter sue ?

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: carewemust

I think the chances of that are less than zero.

Since REAL journalists are becoming ever more scarce, you're probably right.

a reply to: Pyle


ATS rules say that only approximately 10% of the article should be pasted into the Opening Post. We pick what we think is most important.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: carewemust

Skipped this part for some reason...

It also called out reports that "question the legitimacy of the Special Counsel's investigation, tending to advance the opinion that the investigation is 'tainted' and therefore its results are suspect,"

Mueller’s investigations are obviously tainted.
He had to get rid of Strzok.

Strzok and one other person from his team were removed, that we know of. Could be more Trump-haters still there that we don't know of.

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: carewemust


Hopefully this legal action by their beloved and respected Special Counsel, will prompt the Mainstream Media to publish a little less FAKE news for awhile.

-CareWeMust

Don't hold your breath, we like having you around.

Thanks. I said "hopefully", because Mueller is the only (potential) savior that liberal media and Democrats have left now.

a reply to: carewemust

So ... did your head explode trying to figure out if you love or hate Mueller today?

LOL.

Good for him.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: carewemust


Hopefully this legal action by their beloved and respected Special Counsel, will prompt the Mainstream Media to publish a little less FAKE news for awhile.

-CareWeMust

Don't hold your breath, we like having you around.

Thanks. I said "hopefully", because Mueller is the only (potential) savior that liberal media and Democrats have left now.

Savior from what again?

And only Democrats, not liberals, leftists, Progressives, etc?

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Well... Mueller doesn't want any oversight or anyone questioning what they are doing. How would they be able to meet their goals if people looked too closely at what they are doing?

Yes.
It took the IG report on Hillary’s emails to find out about Strzok, getting him thrown off the Mueller team.
Wait until his report on the FISA abuse comes out.

And if it wasn't for the I.G. investigation, we would have never known about the "We'll stop Trump!" text message that Peter Strzok authored. AAG Rod Rosenstein hid that one from Congressional investigators. But Inspector General Horowitz has carte blanche access to everything at the DOJ. (I think)

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: carewemust

Skipped this part for some reason...

It also called out reports that "question the legitimacy of the Special Counsel's investigation, tending to advance the opinion that the investigation is 'tainted' and therefore its results are suspect,"

Mueller’s investigations are obviously tainted.
He had to get rid of Strzok.

Strzok and one other person from his team were removed, that we know of. Could be more Trump-haters still there that we don't know of.

But the Trump-lovers are okay? LOL.

You do know that the demographics of the FBI tend toward middle-aged, former military, White Republicans, right?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Well... Mueller doesn't want any oversight or anyone questioning what they are doing. How would they be able to meet their goals if people looked too closely at what they are doing?

Yes.
It took the IG report on Hillary’s emails to find out about Strzok, getting him thrown off the Mueller team.
Wait until his report on the FISA abuse comes out.

And if it wasn't for the I.G. investigation, we would have never known about the "We'll stop Trump!" text message that Peter Strzok authored. AAG Rod Rosenstein hid that one from Congressional investigators. But Inspector General Horowitz has carte blanche access to everything at the DOJ. (I think)

That crap has been all over the media since January. Give us a break.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Sounds like Mueller found some "internal" leaking.

🚬🔫

Either it was an embarrassing LEAK, or NYT/WaPo really did make it up?

a reply to: jhn7537

I think you're saying that Mueller is using NYT-WaPo to set a "precedent" for hitting FoxNews ultimately?

a reply to: rickymouse

Suspending licenses of media companies is too straight-forward. Would cause a ton of legal problems for the administration. The way to get them is to use the Obama "back-door" method against enemies.

originally posted by: whywhynot
You mean the SC seeks to silence the press! Oh the horror of it.

I didn't think of his actions in that vein. Good point! He complained about FAKE press coverage in April, and now Mueller's filing a legal complaint. He's gone further than Trump!

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: rickymouse
I want to see them suspend the licenses of media promoting fake news for a while as a warning, including any online activity.. Not people on facebook repeating fake news made up by the MSM, steering people to believe something different than is really happening. Enough is enough.

There are no 'licenses' for media.

This isn't Venezuela.

In America, media companies have to be registered and approved by the government, as such.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: carewemust

You really cant make this stuff up ...I refuse to be saddened and so I will LOL

I think it may be a plan to have us root for Muller ...What if he looses ? does that mean they could or would counter sue ?

Mueller's witch-hunt is having the strings pulled out of it, 1 at a time. The entire thing could unravel at any moment.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: carewemust

So ... did your head explode trying to figure out if you love or hate Mueller today?

LOL.

Good for him.

I've never hated Mueller. But I do pay attention to Q-Anon hints and logic. Mueller could be a GOOD guy who's playing his assigned role very well.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: rickymouse
I want to see them suspend the licenses of media promoting fake news for a while as a warning, including any online activity.. Not people on facebook repeating fake news made up by the MSM, steering people to believe something different than is really happening. Enough is enough.

There are no 'licenses' for media.

This isn't Venezuela.

In America, media companies have to be registered and approved by the government, as such.

Wrong.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Well... Mueller doesn't want any oversight or anyone questioning what they are doing. How would they be able to meet their goals if people looked too closely at what they are doing?

Yes.
It took the IG report on Hillary’s emails to find out about Strzok, getting him thrown off the Mueller team.
Wait until his report on the FISA abuse comes out.

And if it wasn't for the I.G. investigation, we would have never known about the "We'll stop Trump!" text message that Peter Strzok authored. AAG Rod Rosenstein hid that one from Congressional investigators. But Inspector General Horowitz has carte blanche access to everything at the DOJ. (I think)

That crap has been all over the media since January. Give us a break.

You are to be congratulated for your investigative prowness, if you knew about Strzok's "We'll stop Trump" text message before Congressional investigators did!

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: rickymouse
I want to see them suspend the licenses of media promoting fake news for a while as a warning, including any online activity.. Not people on facebook repeating fake news made up by the MSM, steering people to believe something different than is really happening. Enough is enough.

In other words...

Censorship

That Constitution is just a worthless piece of paper anyway, eh?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Freedom of speech does not give us the right to slander people or tell lies or falsities, it never has and never will. What happens if you lie under oath and are caught? What happens if you bear false witness against someone and get caught. In both instances you can go do jail. Freedom of speech does not give us the right to use chaotic language to fire people up, look at how many people in history have been put in jail for inciting a riot or causing civil unrest. You may think you have freedom of speech but we have never had a right to abuse that privilege. This country was not formed to become a state of chaos, it was supposed to be a symbiotic relationship between a group of people.

I understand the extent of the laws, evidently you don't and that can destroy your life in the real world we live in.