After 30 years History has judged global-warming predictions

a reply to: Phage


I hope so, I haven't been to a really good fireworks blowup since 1985

originally posted by: BotheLumberJack
a reply to: Greven

It's not my fault there are corrupt Scientists online with bad information.

You realize 'online' exists because of scientific work, no?

Government and university sponsored, even.

a reply to: BotheLumberJack

It's not my fault there are corrupt Scientists online with bad information.

Right. Any thing that contradicts your paradigm is bad information.

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: bobs_uruncle


Your post does not seem to make any sense.
The planet is warming. Like climatologists have said it would.

Yes my post makes sense. To create an illusion you need a pliable audience open to believing anything that fits their preadjusted bias. The programming started in the mid 80's, now we can see the product, progressives, almost zero critical thinking and perfectly willing to follow whatever flavour-of-the-day idea is fed to them. That's why there is fracturing in society rather than unification. You must see this.

Global warming, maybe, though improbable. Agcc is just a bad joke, a volcano or two produces more greenhouse gas than all of our vehicles over a 10-20 year period. How many active volcanoes worldwide, 250? The earth is semiclosed feedback system. More co2, more plant growth.

If your heroes told you oxygen in the air was toxic, would you stop breathing?

Cheers - Dave

WH Memo 9/17/1969: "It is now pretty clearly agreed that the C02 content will rise 25% by 2000.”
Guess what? It did.

Special Message to the Congress on Conservation and Restoration of Natural Beauty, given on February 8, 1965

Air pollution is no longer confined to isolated places. This generation has altered the composition of the atmosphere on a global scale through radioactive materials and a steady increase in carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels. Entire regional airsheds, crop plant environments, and river basins are heavy with noxious materials. Motor vehicles and home heating plants, municipal dumps and factories continually hurl pollutants into the air we breathe. Each day almost 50,000 tons of unpleasant, and sometimes poisonous, sulfur dioxide are added to the atmosphere, and our automobiles produce almost 300,000 tons of other pollutants.

-President Lyndon B. Johnson

The only thing new about climate change are the moving goal posts of so-called 'skeptics.'

a reply to: Greven

Nice numbers. Back to OP. Did Hansen's predictions come true?

originally posted by: Phage

More co2, more plant growth.

Maybe. If the plants have enough water and nutrients. But of course, more plant growth means that there are no other problems involved with increased CO2 concentrations and the warming it causes.

The inverse logarithmic warming it causes, ie diminishing returns.



By the way, which is better: a warmer planet or a colder one?

a reply to: Teikiatsu

Did Hansen's predictions come true?

Mr. Hansen called this outcome the “most plausible,” and predicted it would lead to about 0.7 degree of warming by this year.

Yes.

a reply to: Teikiatsu

Oh, yeah, they came true... the US is underwater. Didn't you get the memo?

TheRedneck

a reply to: Teikiatsu

The inverse logarithmic warming it causes, ie diminishing returns.

What do you mean "inverse?"

But that notion of "saturation" does not apply because the atmosphere is three dimensional. If you want more detail, read this:
www.realclimate.org...

a reply to: TheRedneck

Oh, yeah, they came true... the US is underwater.

Please provide a statement from Hansen to the effect that would be the current situation.

a reply to: Phage

It is? Can you prove that? If not why say it as though it were fact. Look if i didnt challenge you, no one else would.

a reply to: Phage
5G sucks, contrary to what people might think.

a reply to: BotheLumberJack

Prove what? That you think the data is bogus?
Don't you?

a reply to: Phage

No. I hate contests. Virgos don't care about # like that.

a reply to: Phage

Please show me where i attributed that prediction to Saint Hansen.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

I second that. I used that icon because i'm satanic. Im being facectious..

a reply to: TheRedneck

Here is the post to which you replied:

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
a reply to: Greven

Nice numbers. Back to OP. Did Hansen's predictions come true?

Here is your reply:

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Oh, yeah, they came true... the US is underwater. Didn't you get the memo?

TheRedneck

a reply to: queenofswords


Oh , and lets not Forget the Plight of the Worlds Bee Populations that we were told are in Danger of Extinction....




" No, bees are not dying out. No, their populations are not being harmed by neonicotinoid pesticides. No, farmers are not wiping out all the wildflower meadows which allow insects to flourish.
But this is not something you ever hear about it in the media, obsessed as it is with the doom narrative fed to them by green activist bodies like Friends of the Earth. ?





www.breitbart.com...

a reply to: Phage

If you want more detail, read this:
www.realclimate.org...

Er, I did. Now my brain hurts.

I stopped counting at 5 logical mis-assumptions.

TheRedneck

a reply to: Phage

Teikiatsu mentioned Hansen... not me. I'm TheRedneck... different letters and all.

TheRedneck