TWO FBI Agents Murdered One Day Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton!.

a reply to: Phage

I don't give a damn about the Clintons. Give 'em whatever you got to give.

Slightly evasive answer if I've ever heard one?.........Cough.

Don't want to be a marked man Phage?

a reply to: theantediluvian

Well what's wrong with those stories? If you saw men in black you know the national enquirer is the most reliable newspaper ever published. This is their digital version.

a reply to: projectvxn

Oh. Never mind...

a reply to: F4guy

Because It's not about truth anymore. It's only about what one wants to believe.

a reply to: projectvxn

; hoaxing, lying, and deliberate deception should never be tolerated by anyone.

You said a mouth full.

a reply to: Justoneman

You mean find a way to make it true?

a reply to: theantediluvian

Well you could have a point but so does this article on Snopes. Apparently we all have an agenda.

Snopes Gets Punked With New Revelations In Wikileaks Emails About Hillary & NYT Collusion
Tim Brown / January 3, 2018 / 674

thewashingtonstandard.com...

Snopes, the left leaning self-proclaimed “fact checker” that hires dominatrixes and former porn stars and hookers to do their “fact checking” has once again been debunked for covering for The New York Times and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. What’s so great about this latest “punking” of Snopes is that it comes by way of Infowars and assertions they made more than a year ago about Hillary Clinton colluding with the New York Times by getting information in advance about negative stories that would have an impact on her.

a reply to: mekhanics

We all have freedom of speech do we not? You, us the janitorial staff. Its so convoluted out there that you may be correct, the original OP may be correct, INFO wars may be correct and Snope's may be in fact a left leaning buch of junk.

Thank you for your service in getting this Post to #1 among all of ATS!

Snopes, the left leaning self-proclaimed “fact checker” that hires dominatrixes and former porn stars and hookers to do their “fact checking” has once again been debunked for covering for The New York Times and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. What’s so great about this latest “punking” of Snopes is that it comes by way of Infowars and assertions they made more than a year ago about Hillary Clinton colluding with the New York Times by getting information in advance about negative stories that would have an impact on her.

Why is this the number 1 link on the homepage instead of in the hoax bin?

a reply to: theantediluvian

Follow the white rabbit down the hole as there could be a connect here. Just Rod working with Suiter means there was a federal level investigation involving guns.

www.baltimoresun.com...

Rod Rosenstein reacts to killing of Baltimore detective U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein talked about the killing of a Baltimore homicide detective and crime in the city Thursday night at an appearance in Chicago. Speaking at the Chicago Crime Commission annual dinner, Maryland’s former top federal prosecutor said Detective Sean Suiter worked closely with his office. “Today, we are praying for Sean Suiter’s family and the Baltimore Police Department. But prayer is not enough,” Rosenstein said in remarks sent from the Department of Justice.

When they go low, we go high!

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: carewemust

neonnettle is a fake news website. No wonder you dumb right wing can't idenrify what is true and what is false.

That's why you voted dumb president.

At least our votes actually matter. you get to vote and they still do what they want.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Raggedyman

No.
I don't give a damn about the Clintons. Give 'em whatever you got to give.

But don't idolize Trump because that's idiotic.

You talk about him a lot for someone who likes to appear to be above it all. You wouldn't happen to have a crush for golden Donny, would you?

originally posted by: Bundy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Raggedyman

No.
I don't give a damn about the Clintons. Give 'em whatever you got to give.

But don't idolize Trump because that's idiotic.

You talk about him a lot for someone who likes to appear to be above it all. You wouldn't happen to have a crush for golden Donny, would you?

Maybe, just maybe he is offering a *gasp!* moderate perspective?

I don't trust any politician. You'd be well to understand that basic truth.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
The fact that there is no direct obvious evidence that says Hillary had those people killed clearly shows evidence of a cover-up of epic proportions.

And the only person capable of such a cover-up?

Hillary.

So yes, she is a blood thirsty killer.


#TruthBomb

Your brilliant 'truth bomb ' is to say that since there is zero evidence implicating Hillary in this, that in itself is clear evidence of Hillary having something to do with this? And you got 6 stars?


God you Trump fanatics are as dense as everyone else says you are.

a reply to: nightbringr

And you. . . have absolutely no sense of humor.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: nightbringr

And you. . . have absolutely no sense of humor.

If that was sarcasm, I apologize.

Hard to tell here sometimes.

a reply to: carewemust

Why is anyone surprised by it, I don't even get it.

As we all know (and I have seen) both Clinton and Bill were trained from an early age in the Wushnu temple in Japan to be killers.
Bill by the age of 16 had killed over 30 people on every continent and Hilary had mastered the hand shake of three days (a simple handshake which kills the person three days later of bullets being in them) then TPTB sent them to go to college in the US.
The rest is history but they continue to kill they killed Bowie and Prince for a bet (You wonder what happened to all that uranium? In Bowie's tea).
Unfortunately I saw them both sneak by in ninja onesies into trump tower and they had a party with Trump who is actually a Clinton secret agent.
I suspect I will be killed now for revealing the truth.
I will go now to delete my browser history.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Justoneman

You mean find a way to make it true?

Not sure what you were referencing but I am sure if the truth hopped up and hit you it would not make a dent. Your Tinfoil hat is pretty big.