President Obama's A.G. LORETTA LYNCH Did Something So Bad - Its CLASSIFIED.

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: carewemust

Lynch and Bill Clinton only talked about the grandkids on the tarmac.
I think the exact words were something like this -

Bill: “If you don’t dump cold water on Hillary’s email investigation, we won’t see our grandkids outside of prison visits.”
Lynch: “You are right, I will call Comey after you leave the plane.”

The tarmac thing is minor whats going to cause Lynch a problem is its beginning to look like she was working with the Clinton team during the investigation. The Tarmac meeting was a smoke screen for the real contacts she was making.

nypost.com...


nypost.com...

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Lumenari

Well for now its the whole Trump aide and the sex cult.They Are trying very hard.

Obvious is so obvious.

Everyone who tries to "hurt" our great President is coming into hard times. Even Stormy Daniels left the stage early, here in Chicago a few days ago. She was an hour late, and only "worked the pole" for 15 minutes.

As the audience waited for Daniels to appear, a dancer scaled a pole to Santana’s “Smooth,” a woman walked up to a dancer and tentatively placed a bill in her thong, and the bass of “Uptown Funk” pounded through the back of leopard-print chairs, which looked like Lisa Frank designs under the party lights.

Just after the “Make America Horny Again” performance Thursday, Cecola told the Tribune he “thought her show was nothing to write home about,” questioning then whether the rest of the shows would go on.

Chicago Tribune: www.chicagotribune.com...

Could possibly be Wasserman-Schultz.


They have her laptop and may have found something on it.


She wanted it back and made no qualms about it.

a reply to: Muninn


I believe that's why Donald Trump switched from being a lifelong Democrat, over to a Republican late in life. He saw that they were crooked, and not too bright. Not the party someone who wanted to "make a positive difference", would want to be associated with.

a reply to: RazorV66


It's also on good authority that Bill was bringing a message to Loretta Lynch from Hillary. If she'd get Hillary off the hook, she (Lynch) would be nominated to fill the Supreme Court opening created by Justice Antonin Scalia's death.

Just 5 days later, corrupt Comey cleared Hillary of all criminal wrongdoing.

No wonder Lynch was so insanely angry after Hillary lost! Everyone has seen the video of her calling for riots and blood in the streets. WAAAAY over the top. Now we know why!

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: carewemust


Can't Trump just declassify it?

I believe President Trump can declassify whatever he wants to, so long as a letter of request is received from Congress. Congress generated a letter to I.G. Horowitz on June 14th, after the I.G. report was released. If he does not comply, Congress can then ask the President to force release of the classified and redacted sections of the I.G. Report.

But he probably wouldn't declassify 100% of the I.G. Report appendix and addendums for public view. There probably are FBI and other "whistle-blowers" named. We want them to feel safe, and for others to come forward.

originally posted by: highvein

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: carewemust

Lynch and Bill Clinton only talked about the grandkids on the tarmac.
I think the exact words were something like this -

Bill: “If you don’t dump cold water on Hillary’s email investigation, we won’t see our grandkids outside of prison visits.”
Lynch: “You are right, I will call Comey after you leave the plane.”

As Bill was about to leave he turned back to Lynch and said, "Bye the way, do you like cigars?".

That's a stretch. Bill liked administering therapy to young thangs.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RazorV66


It's also on good authority that Bill was bringing a message to Loretta Lynch from Hillary. If she'd get Hillary off the hook, she (Lynch) would be nominated to fill the Supreme Court opening created by Justice Antonin Scalia's death.

Just 5 days later, corrupt Comey cleared Hillary of all criminal wrongdoing.

No wonder Lynch was so insanely angry after Hillary lost! Everyone has seen the video of her calling for riots and blood in the streets. WAAAAY over the top. Now we know why!

I recommend the death penalty for all the names you mentioned.

a reply to: carewemust

We use to own a business in Chicago and even though we were not democrats we gave to their so called causes but only because we knew it was the only way to get what we wanted.

Nice....tagging to keep up on this story.

2nd

IF there is something classified that covers up a crime solely for the purpose of covering up aforementioned crime, that would be in direct violation of the EO concerning classified information.

It plainly states that information may not be classified to cover up a crime.

Edit to delete the dribble.

a reply to: Vasa Croe


THIS may be part of what the I.G. is hiding on Loretta Lynch.
twitter.com...

I take it you guys didnt read the IG report on the Clinton investigation?

Comey said that he also was concerned about an issue specific to Lynch. As
discussed in more detail in the classified appendix to this report, Comey told the
OIG that the FBI had obtained highly classified information in March 2016 that
included allegations of partisan bias or attempts to impede the Midyear
investigation by Lynch. Numerous witnesses we interviewed—including Comey—
said that the FBI assessed that these allegations were not credible based on various
factors, including that some of the information was objectively false. For example,
the information also suggested that Comey was attempting to influence the
investigation by extending it to help Republicans win the election, which witnesses
said the FBI knew was not true. By mid-June 2016, the FBI had obtained no
information corroborating the Lynch-related allegations.

When asked about this information, Comey stated that he knew it was not
credible on its face because it was not consistent with his personal experience with
Lynch. Comey stated, “I saw no, I’ll say this again, I saw no reality of Loretta
Lynch interfering in this investigation.” However, Comey said that he became
concerned that the information about Lynch would taint the public’s perception of
the Midyear investigation if it leaked, particularly after DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0
began releasing hacked emails in mid-June 2016.

Despite these concerns, Comey told the OIG that it did not occur to him to
request a special counsel in late 2015, after Lynch’s instruction to use the term
“matter” or former President Obama’s public comments about the investigation
(discussed in Chapter Four), because Comey was satisfied with the nature and the
quality of the investigation being conducted by the FBI. Comey emphasized that
the FBI had its “A team” working on the investigation, and that he was closely
involved to ensure that the team was protected from political or other influence.

As we describe in more detail in the classified appendix, Yates and Axelrod
told us that the FBI mentioned this information to them sometime in the Spring of
2016 and provided a defensive briefing on it on July 12, 2016.128 Yates said that
the FBI told her that the information was not deemed credible and did not show her
the relevant documents. After being shown the documents in her OIG interview,
Yates expressed frustration and said that, had she been informed that the FBI had
concerns about the information, she would have engaged Comey in discussions
about the impact on the Midyear investigation. The FBI also did not provide Lynch
with a defensive briefing about the information until August 2016, more than a
month after investigative activity in Midyear was concluded, and she also was told
that the information was not credible. Lynch said that until Comey’s public
testimony in 2017, she was never told that the information played a role in his
unilateral decision to make a public statement about the Midyear investigation or
concerns about whether a special counsel was necessary.

Right there in report. The classified Lynch intel was found to be non-credible and that was that.

Page 171-172 OIG Report on the Clinton Investigation.

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: carewemust


Can't Trump just declassify it?

If someone requires it. It appears Horowitz said he'd do just that.

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: xuenchen

Were going to need something bigger than the made up story about the kids

Id place my bets on the race card for this one.

a reply to: Pyle

I gave you a star for quoting the IG report, but your conclusion is incorrect.

The part you quoted is only one part of the report discussing this, but even your quote says:

After being shown the documents in her OIG interview, Yates expressed frustration and said that, had she been informed that the FBI had concerns about the information, she would have engaged Comey in discussions about the impact on the Midyear investigation

The only one who claims that he found it non-credible was Comey. He did not even tell the assistant AG about it. When Yates saw it, she found it credible.

Then in other parts of the report, Comey uses his doubts about Lynch, including the classified information, as justification for his decisions in certain parts. He even testified to Congress that he did not trust Lynch. This goes against his claims that it was not credible.

Senator Burr then asked whether there were other things that contributed to
Comey’s decision that he could describe in an open session. Comey stated:

There were other things that contributed to that. One significant item
I can’t, I know the committee’s been briefed on. There’s been some
public accounts of it, which are nonsense, but I understand the
committee’s been briefed on the classified facts.

Probably the only other consideration that I guess I can talk about in
an open setting is at one point the Attorney General had directed me
not to call it an “investigation,” but instead to call it a “matter,” which
confused me and concerned me. But that was one of the bricks in the
load that led me to conclude I have to step away from the Department
if we’re to close this case credibly.

Comey was asked to provide additional details about Lynch’s instruction to
call the Midyear investigation a “matter” by Senator James Lankford. Comey
stated:

Well, it concerned me because we were at the point where we had
refused to confirm the existence, as we typically do, of an investigation
for months, and it was getting to a place where that looked silly,
because the campaigns were talking about interacting with the FBI in
the course of our work.

The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kind of euphemisms—
security review, matters, things like that—for what was going on. We
were getting to a place where the Attorney General and I were both
going to have to testify and talk publicly about [it]. And I wanted to
know, was she going to authorize us to confirm we had an
investigation?

Comey also had an extended exchange with Senator John Cornyn about
whether Lynch had an appearance of a conflict of interest requiring appointment of
a special counsel.

SENATOR CORNYN: But it seems to me that you clearly believe that
Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General, had an appearance of a conflict of
interest on the Clinton email investigation. Is that correct?

COMEY: I think that’s fair. I didn’t believe she could credibly decline
that investigation, at least not without grievous damage to the
Department of Justice and to the FBI.

SENATOR CORNYN: And, under Department of Justice and FBI norms,
wouldn’t it have been appropriate for the Attorney General, or, if she
had recused herself—which she did not do—for the Deputy Attorney
General to appoint a special counsel? That’s essentially what’s
happened now with Director Mueller. Would that have been an
appropriate step in the Clinton email investigation in your opinion?

COMEY: Certainly a possible step, yes, sir.

It was not all about the tarmac. The tarmac meeting was just the final straw that pushed Comey to go rogue.

Comey told us that by the time the tarmac incident occurred on June 27, 2016, he was already “90 percent there” in terms of the decision to make a public statement, but that the tarmac meeting “tipped the scales” towards making his mind up to go forward with an independent announcement on the Midyear investigation.

Also, if the Lynch information was not credible, why would it be classified?

originally posted by: Muninn
a reply to: carewemust

We use to own a business in Chicago and even though we were not democrats we gave to their so called causes but only because we knew it was the only way to get what we wanted.

The very definition of the "mafia" and "organized crime"!

"You need to pay us for protection."
"Protection from who????"
"Protection from...us!"

edit on 6/19/2018 by Flyingclaydisk because: (no reason given)