It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: imthegoat
I can tell we're going to have a thousand people with 2,000 guesses about what that photo is.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
I'm guessing they don't need Strzok's testimony before congress without a deal and without pleading the fifth.
Popcorn. 🍿
originally posted by: IAMTAT
...and Q appears to have just affirmed "[J_C] " represents John P. Carlin.
qanon.pub...
FLASHBACK:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: Blueracer
And thank YOU for years of relentless reporting. Things have already started changing because there are thousands like you. And the best is yet to come.
What am I missing here? You called neonettle "one huge disinfo source" and apologized. Now you are commending someone for starting a thread based on that "one huge disinfo source"?!?
originally posted by: vinifalou
George Soros, the Illuminati, and Snow White are all controlling the world according to a 4channer who has spawned a legion of supersleuths.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
You know, I'd never heard of LARPing until people started calling Q a LARP. I've run across thousands of wingnuts spewing strange theories in various corners of the internet. Almost every single one of them is totally ignored by the MSM. Q, however, is constantly being attacked by people trying to tell us this is obvious nonsense, including a cadre of people here on ATS who seemingly exist for no other purpose. That, to me, if one of the biggest proofs Q is legitimate.
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
I just had a thought and sorry if it has already been posted before, but what if the point of Google being so important for Q and the difficulty in presenting evidence in the right order etc. is because the evidence has been collected by mobiles that shouldn't have been "listening".
For example, the tarmac meeting. How would any evidence of what was said between them actually exist unless one of them was personally bugged or their phone was listening in on them.