-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux
Wonder if this is what Q meant by beware clickbait.

i'm confused... Q posts a vid that says it's a speech to the Bilderbergs but it's not, actually...

and this is interpreted as some kind of test from Q because he said beware of clickbait?

....

what

Cut me some slack. I'm new to the Q thing, and still trying to figure it out.

Note that Q1526 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub... is both a CONFIRMATION and MARKER post, being 1 min after previous post. We interpret 1 min Marker as "Action imminent"!


So Q is both confirming that what the anon says is correct and saying that action is imminent - i.e. we will imminently have proof that Rod Rosenstein altered the IG report!!

originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux
Cut me some slack. I'm new to the Q thing, and still trying to figure it out.

sorry, i wasn't trying to slam you at all. just trying to understand.

posts after seem to show people who have been following this for a while rationalizing how it must be a secret message or intentional because Q is 'too intelligent' to make a mistake, which does make me wonder exactly how bad Q would have to blow it for some to lose faith. is there no move so wrongfooted that it can't be embraced into the larger narrative?

a reply to: fiverx313

I can understand your point and am having a hard time reconciling this one as well but I am willing to look for alternative explanations before declaring the whole thing a larp

Why would they post the edited clip, followed by the entire speech if they were trying to pass something off on people?

The questions that follow suggest that as well. A warning against clickbait?

a reply to: TomLawless

I wish I knew

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

www.omaha.com...

Omaha. When Seth Rich was a child, Omaha was the site of the greatest exposing of the Pedo-Satanic Cabal to that date, the Franklin Coverup. No wonder Seth Rich was determined to expose these people.

As for "Panda"...a code work of the pedo-satanic cult.

I'm confused about the dedication plaque. The part that says "Friend to all, including panda."

If that plaque is giving a descriptive summary of Rich, why would it say "friend to all, including panda" when Rich was Panda? Have we been wrong about him being panda, or am I misunderstanding what's being said on the plaque?

Bingo. If Seth is a friend to Panda, Panda also refers to something other than him. Mods have advised that I no longer talk about this (lest I end up like Julian Assange), but you can Search its meaning in a pedo context.

(Finally I no longer say "Google it" but "Search It")

Q Post #1527 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...


DECODE
Timestamp to Acronym gives "KIU".

There is a Vietnamese restaurant in Barcelona called "KIU NAM". It is apparently good value with no outdoor seating at Villaroel, 199 08036 Barcelona.

Meanwhile the #QANON picture appears to be looking down the main tourist avenue, the "Ramblas", which is the widest road just above the left of the last "N"

ETA - 2nd DECODE by Guccifer/Florida method gives a simple clean "rr" which ties Rod Rosenstein to Barcelona somehow... anyone wana ring KIU NAMs and cancel his dinner reservation?

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: fiverx313

I can understand your point and am having a hard time reconciling this one as well but I am willing to look for alternative explanations before declaring the whole thing a larp

that's entirely fair. all explanations should be explored, i think.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Just for clarification.

The IG report we are seeing is the "Public" version.



👆pdf p.35-36

originally posted by: carewemust
In new post #1528 @ qanon.pub...

President Obama is speaking in a secret conference?

Can't imagine him calling Americans "too small minded to govern our own affairs", in an open public forum.

Yeah. That was a crappy disinfo edit. Never was an Obama fan. But I watched the whole speech, and it was very well done. It's obvious now that he was lying in a few places...US Govco spent 5 billion to foment the Ukrainian uprising. And Soros spent a few billion too. But, the clip that was pasted together, was malarkey.

a reply to: xuenchen

So there are 3 reports

ETA why would they give him a “redacted altered” report when they had to know he would get the original? It doesn’t make sense.

This whole thing is starting to stink to high heaven

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: imthegoat

It's weird wording, to be sure.

I have read, somewhere in these past months, that Seth was possibly abused as a kid.

Heresay of course.

The wording is odd many have confirmed Panda as his user name.

Panda also has connection with abuse, the black eyes.

Could they be poking fun at his alter ego?

Why would they write that there?

I can picture Podesta dictating it...

Eta. Also like rel said what's a bike? Something everybody rides. It's derogatory. Why a bike rack?

Maybe it is a private acknowledgment of his abused past and the reason he decided to turn on them.

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I'm seeing a lot of applications for IRT being precision automation control. I also saw a metion of Seimens, big players in automation and PLC applications in one of the stories while quick browsing the topic.

Weren't Seimans controllers being used on the Uranium centrifuges in Iran when they went kaplooie due to the Stuxnet infection?

NVM-no food, yet...

No idea if it is related...but, the CEO ( I think) of Seimens was on the televised Davos meeting of people kissing the ring and being praised by Trump for investments back to the US jobs market. I noticed because I had not heard the company mentioned in many years, in the popular press.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: xuenchen

So there are 3 reports

ETA why would they give him a “redacted altered” report when they had to know he would get the original? It doesn’t make sense.

They NEVER thought he would win. They spent over $154M trying to dig dirt on POTUS and found out he isn't gay and would grab a woman's Pu$$y. Meanwhile here we are exposing every single clown on crime after crime. Just a matter of time. Tick Tock...

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: xuenchen

So there are 3 reports

ETA why would they give him a “redacted altered” report when they had to know he would get the original? It doesn’t make sense.

Give to who?

a reply to: xuenchen

sorry, i should have said release not give (to us) . why would they release a redacted altered report knowing full well the other 2 versions are sure to come out?