-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

originally posted by: FlyingFox

And here I was, thinking i was the ONLY one to notice that!

Apparently he's Kekistani and wanted to show his national pride.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Dunno if this was posted already:

Mystery woman found dead in trash compactor at Huma Abedins apartment

The 48-year-old, who police say lived at the premises, was found unconscious inside the machine, and was pronounced dead at the scene.

Police had been called to the block at 1 Irving Place in Union Square, where Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin own an apartment, just before 5pm.

She was found by a building maintenance worker, and her identity has been withheld until police notify her family.

Police do not yet know how she ended up in the trash compactor, but NBC reports her purse was found nearby.

Security footage also shows the woman walking into the apartment building shortly before she was found inside the machine, PIX11 reported.

Weiner and Abedin have owned an apartment at the address for 16 years, which was listed for rent at $11,900 a month on the same day he pleaded guilty to sexting a 15-year-old girl.

I guess we'll never know if this is connected to Huma.

I was thinking that might be the missing W from DT’s LAYERS tweet that was found, but I have a conspiratorally biased imagination.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: pavil

I agree! I think his comment about Boris Johnson before the visit implies he's been planning to help Boris into the PMs chair in return for helping to drain the UK swamp.

The Matrix 5 stuff implies they had man-in-the middle blackmail material on Boris. If POTUS has removed that blackmail then Boris owes POTUS? This makes sense as Theresa May is on the Matrix 5 list of Crown Agents sisters operatives - so to take them down he has to take May down too?

There is a very esoteric part of this in play. My perspective is the Queen must/will give up her control of the planet in order for all the other components to go into place. Depending one's perspective she can be seen as "owner" of earth, "trustee" of earth, rep for the overlords and a few others: btw that control is bs regardless.

She must walk now, it is written. Then the way is cleared for a different leadership process all around, especially in the UK. DJT then heads to confirm with Vlad, while I know folks don't trust him, Cranky's take is he's been working on this for a while. The convergence I mentioned is melding...

I expect, or trust..., Q... will give us a peek at the results as they unfold

a reply to: IAMTAT

I would imagine Q's going dark was planned for Independence Day to allow time to prepare the dominos to be knocked over on the Europe trip?

The question is how long, or what date, has Q planned to return?

a reply to: carewemust

This raises an important point CWM..."The Hard Work is over"... is this from Q's view point - that they have enough admissible evidence, and following, from us to execute the plan?

Is that enough for US though? Surely to maximise our confidence that we have "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth", we want to continue digging until we feel we have answers to, and understanding of, all Q Posts?

I feel we have plenty more reconciling of evidence against Q Posts to do yet. At least we know the time pressure is off for a while though.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I agree... Remember being awake means more than waiting for a crumb. Get hungry.

QAnon From Wikipedia, QAnon refers to a conspiracy theory based on Q, an online handle used on several image boards by a presumably American[1] pseudonymous poster claiming to have access to classified information involving the Trump administration and its opponents in the United States, and detailing a supposed secret counter-coup against the alleged "deep state". The resulting conspiracy theory, mainly popularized by supporters of United States President Donald Trump under the names The Storm and The Great Awakening, has been widely characterized as "baseless"[2][3] and "unhinged".[4][5] Prominent adherents to the conspiracy theory include Roseanne Barr,[6][7] Curt Schilling,[8] and Cheryl Sullenger.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I feel we have plenty more reconciling of evidence against Q Posts to do yet. At least we know the time pressure is off for a while though.

The information we have so far been given is very similar to some forms of prophecy. The meaning of much that we have will not become apparent until after the fact.

When the dominoes start to fall, we will look back and say 'Ahhh, that is what it meant.

To all the fence sitters and nay sayers, this will be all the proof that they need to finally comprehend what has happened.

Very similar tactics to Michel de Nostradamus.

P

a reply to: crankyoldman

There is a very esoteric part of this in play. My perspective is the Queen must/will give up her control of the planet in order for all the other components to go into place. Depending one's perspective she can be seen as "owner" of earth, "trustee" of earth, rep for the overlords and a few others: btw that control is bs regardless.

Considering Prince Harry's comment to Megan's Dad "Give Trump a chance", I wonder if the Queen and family agrees with Trump and wants the immigration to her country, which is/has destroyed their culture, to stop.

She and the family aren't allowed to insert themselves in politics, but Harry's leaked remark may be a clue to the families concern.

a reply to: liveandlearn

She and the family aren't allowed to insert themselves in politics, but Harry's leaked remark may be a clue to the families concern.

Harry may well be his own man. He knows who killed his mother. He may just be waiting patiently. Timing is everything.

P

a reply to: pheonix358

Hopefully that is what will happen... but if any loose ends remain "untied up" I'm guna be like the guy who just can't remember the title of a song that I can't get out of my head.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Plus, as more Q's messages reached mainstream publications, and generated ridicule, it seemed that Q was working overtime to prove his legitimacy. Paraphrasing: "When will the press ask Sarah Sanders or President Trump about me?"

Add running into that brick wall to "The Hard Work being behind us", and it's just slowed down Q's posting.

BTW... during Strzok's testimony, I heard a Congressman refer to the "Public Version" of the Inspector General's last report. Q said that there was a PUBLIC and a NON-Public version. I thought that quite interesting...and perplexing. Perhaps during the closed-session with Strzok, the Non-Public (classified) I.G. report was used for Q&A.

a reply to: pheonix358

His own man but also possibly not of royal blood; as covered in the posts regarding his likeness to James Hewitt. Not sure what I'd do if I knew my public father had killed my mother and wasn't my biological father!

Just to be objective, there was anther thread on ATS about a year ago tying William and Harry to end times with Harry being the Antichrist and becoming King after William killed in Jerusalem. Can't seem to find it now but it had a lot of memes/maps generated within it.

a reply to: carewemust

I certainly hope so re questioning Strzok's questioning on Non-Public report.

BTW it would be interesting to know Strzok's movements after the hearing... is he wandering around free as though it's all over? Or gone dark?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Isn't it curious that Q's last post was on INDEPENDENCE DAY?

No coincidences.

And, he posted a partial piece of a Nov. 9, 2017 post (#128) in which the letters and words in brackets spelled out, "CIA is here...pray".

Right after Q's last post, the qresearch board went on the blink. I don't know, but if Q hasn't posted anything by 7/14, I'm going to think we have all we need and time is up.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

His own man but also possibly not of royal blood

So ........ make him King .......... and bye bye blood line.

Only takes his brother to refuse the crown.

Has happened before.

History repeats.

P

a reply to: pheonix358

I can agree with that, but why seemingly endorse and american president that seems to be in such disfavor with most of the western world? I don't see the queen, an older person with very different cultural values, embracing what has happened to what she consider her kingdom.

I doubt we will hear of the conversation they have.

I'm just trying to understand POTUS schedule for the rest of the weekend:

1) Today he has a working lunch at Chequers with Prime Minister May. If lunch starts at 12:00 (unlikely) then I doubt he is leaving Chequers before 3pm. He then flies to Windsor castle to meet the Queen. Flight will take up to half an hour so say 4pm before he sits down for tea with the Queen to impart his message. Then up to Scotland for the next two days.

I'm seeing that he's going to give the Queen an ultimatum and say "You have 48 hours, I want a reply before I leave Scotland".

Ps I wonder if he's going to dig up missing bloodline evidence from Rosslyn chapel whilst in Scotland!

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: pheonix358

I can agree with that, but why seemingly endorse and american president that seems to be in such disfavor with most of the western world? I don't see the queen, an older person with very different cultural values, embracing what has happened to what she consider her kingdom.

I doubt we will hear of the conversation they have.

Because the young Prince knows of the underlying battle for world control ... and is on the side of the people.

The Queen is one of them, it is possible that Prince Harry is not and therefore will support their take down.

How can he sit down for dinner, next to his Father who had his Mother killed.

P

a reply to: pheonix358

It takes both Charles and William to refuse the crown but, yes, I see what you're saying.

The question is though, "Does the monarchy need to be dissolved in order to properly free the whole commonwealth and destroy Admiralty Law?"

Not sure how I would feel about that.

I would see a meritocratic democracy as fair to all.