-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: queenofswords

Witness mentioned RR possible involved. But yea, not looking credible enough to me either.

Still waiting for EVIDENCES.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Very interesting, MME. That puts things in a whole different perspective.

...hmmmm...Maybe he won't get approved after all, but all this info will be revealed in the interim confirmation interviews and brought into the light!

Maybe that's the Grand Plan to begin with in nominating him.

There's at least 3 other really great picks in the wings.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: TomLawless

If Corsi is involved, there is a 100% chance the whole thing is disinfo.

My feeling is there is a very nefarious reason that this new Seth Rich stuff is being brought to the forefront again. I'm not ready to share it yet, but there is obviously some reason for it and these new allegations are so tantalyzing.

..I don't think it's because the truth is coming out.

I noticed in the thread with the Gateway Pundit story that the article said that information would slowly be released because the witness was in fear or danger...whatever. That's always an alarm bell because the best thing to do is get all the info out in public so that no one is living with secrets that make them a target.

This has the feel of a planted wild goose chase.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: IAMTAT

I just don't see anything good coming from this nomination and nothing good behind it. Any new Vince Foster revelations would just implicate Kavanaugh in a cover up. So that's not happening.... Trump may as well have nominated James F-ing Comey and this nomination is a huge red flag. He has no business serving as a SCOTUS justice.

Thank you!!!

I intended to re-visit Kavanaugh's role in the Ken Starr farce, and make sure I wasn't mis-remembering. You brought up even more/worse than I remembered. I really don't understand this nomination, unless it's a strategic move to have some of this information unsealed and released publicly... but I'm not holding my breath.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Just stopped in to say, YEP!

Whenever there is a 'new' story that is telegraphed to be played out over weeks, it should set off alarm bells.

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: queenofswords

Witness mentioned RR possible involved. But yea, not looking credible enough to me either.

Still waiting for EVIDENCES.

Thing is who can you trust in this specific case. DC police buried it pretty fast and nobody since then is interested in finding the killer/s of SR or investigate the case. Withholding the coroner report raises all sorts of red flags. The whole thing reeks of a 187 sanctioned by the Deep State and corrupt people in all departments covered it up. SR discovered way more than he bargained for and that got him ultimately killed.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Very interesting, MME. That puts things in a whole different perspective.

...hmmmm...Maybe he won't get approved after all, but all this info will be revealed in the interim confirmation interviews and brought into the light!

Maybe that's the Grand Plan to begin with in nominating him.

There's at least 3 other really great picks in the wings.

I think it's a certainty he will be confirmed. Democrats are putting on a show acting like they take issue with this pick. They know Kavanaugh will do a throughly dirty job.

I don't think Democrats will take him to task on the Vince Foster murder cover up, for obvious reasons. And Kavanaugh was working for Kenneth Starr, so I don't believe Republicans will either...for obvious reasons.

Eh, we'll see though.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

"That's always an alarm bell because the best thing to do is get all the info out in public so that no one is living with secrets that make them a target"

Isn't that what "Q" is allegedly doing?

I keep hearing on this thread that 'Trump has everything' - the servers, weiner's laptop, etc - basically everything he needs to take down the bad guys. But he can't use it yet - he needs to figure out how to carefully introduce this evidence.

I'm in the UK where things work differently, so can anyone explain - if there is all this evidence of extreme corruption and dark goings-on, why can't he use it right away? Thanks.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

This really is interesting to ponder.

Why is Seth Rich's murder being brought into the forefront once again?

A "silly" person here on ATS on another thread poo-pooed the idea that so many people could be involved in a cover-up, especially people in high LE positions.

Well, reading your link in your post, MME, there is some pretty compelling evidence that that is exactly what happened in the Vince Foster case.

Parallel revelations?

ETA: Now I'm wondering if any of the same people involved in the VF case, including the initial crime scene investigation, are also involved in the investigation (or lack thereof) in the SR case. Just thinking out loud.

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: MotherMayEye

"That's always an alarm bell because the best thing to do is get all the info out in public so that no one is living with secrets that make them a target"

Isn't that what "Q" is allegedly doing?

Not sure what you mean by this question.

a reply to: Millions

How many people are you willing to sacrifice for the truth? 1000? 10000? 1 million? 10 million? Deep State or the Cabal or whatever does not care about human life. To them we are just cattle.

originally posted by: Millions
I keep hearing on this thread that 'Trump has everything' - the servers, weiner's laptop, etc - basically everything he needs to take down the bad guys. But he can't use it yet - he needs to figure out how to carefully introduce this evidence.

I'm in the UK where things work differently, so can anyone explain - if there is all this evidence of extreme corruption and dark goings-on, why can't he use it right away? Thanks.

It's a few different things working together -- or against each other -- depending on how you look at it. Part of the problem is that much of the information has been classified, supposedly for national security... i.e., if the information were public knowledge, it would put our national security at risk. Maybe it would reveal too much about how we gather intel, or maybe it would reveal the identity of intelligence agents. Things like that. Another part of the problem is that investigators want to conduct investigations out of the public eye, with their findings released publicly only upon conclusion of the investigation. Another part of the problem is what's known as the balance of powers, with the agencies under the executive branch not wanting to provide documents and records to the legislative branch.

It basically comes down to a bunch of real (or contrived) technicalities getting in the way of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

And, yes, it's all very frustrating!

a reply to: queenofswords

Q mentioned that people were freed and this whole thing is about exposing past and present crimes. Removing the blackmail of certain people involved with the cover ups of said crimes would allow new investigations to take place after those people come forward.

a reply to: queenofswords

Hillary seems to prefer running for POTUS with as much baggage and scandal as possible. Maybe she's planning on running again?

If she does..and there's only one other viable candidate for the Democratic nomination, then I'd say that these new allegations are being planted by her people.

I still suspect the DNC is going to run Oprah and that it's been in the works for at least a decade. If not in 2020, then in 2024. Hillary could help her win the nomination with her baggage and unlikability factor.

originally posted by: Millions
I keep hearing on this thread that 'Trump has everything' - the servers, weiner's laptop, etc - basically everything he needs to take down the bad guys. But he can't use it yet - he needs to figure out how to carefully introduce this evidence.

I'm in the UK where things work differently, so can anyone explain - if there is all this evidence of extreme corruption and dark goings-on, why can't he use it right away? Thanks.

Let me put it this way:

Most of the d-bags that need to be exposed are slimey, crooked, evil, smart, criminal, sadistic, and well-versed in how to use TECHNICALITIES within the law to maneuver around to accomplish their dirty deeds to maintain their power structure.

Nothing worse than a Lawyer turned Politician!!

The Kavanaugh-Vince Foster connection is troubling. Thing is, there's a lot we don't know about Foster's death. Like why they killed him. Given the sort of people who tend to be in the Clintons' orbit, it's likely Foster was far from innocent.

That the same people who helped cover up his death were involved with Ken Starr and Clinton's impeachment is very interesting. I wonder if they were trying to remove Clinton because of Foster's death?

Still, for the reasons mentioned above, we might see all the grandstanding against Kavanaugh disappear over the next few days. He might well get confirmed easily, because neither the Dems nor the anti-Trump Republicans will dare to bring up those subjects.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: queenofswords

Hillary seems to prefer running for POTUS with as much baggage and scandal as possible. Maybe she's planning on running again?

If she does..and there's only one other viable candidate for the Democratic nomination, then I'd say that these new allegations are being planted by her people.

I still suspect the DNC is going to run Oprah and that it's been in the works for at least a decade. If not in 2020, then in 2024. Hillary could help her win the nomination with her baggage and unlikability factor.

Nah. Oprah is damaged goods now. She was very chummy with Weinstein and the rest of the Hollywood rapist crowd.

Listening to the stupid questions of the so-called journalists is aggrovating. No wonder i admire Sarah Sanders so much. They behave like 6th graders. Regarding the whole Luke thing i am still on the fence but that SS made the polygraph with him that he passed lends some credence to his story.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Thanks for the effort Rel. It takes me to a go daddy page with the same link as the original. However, I do recall reading the info a couple years ago. Each individual probably deserves additional research.