-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Right because all the False information about "Antifa", laughable, everyone's obsession with Antifa is laughable, if you actually knew what was going on with Antifa, and also what other anarchists thought of Antifa and not the spoon-fed false news that these rightists are spewing maybe you would think different

originally posted by: Jusvistn
Why does the answer to who Q is matter?
The information that has been dug into and uncovered is REAL
The people who are participating in the movement is REAL
And the results of mass awareness, motivation & excitement is REAL

GOD Bless & Carry on.....

It matters if he is a liar.

The change that you think is coming might not be REAL.

originally posted by: LurkNoMore
How about this Q?

That is wrong. The real message is that Trump is comped and HRC is in control using skull to voice tech.

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Right because all the False information about "Antifa", laughable, everyone's obsession with Antifa is laughable, if you actually knew what was going on with Antifa, and also what other anarchists thought of Antifa and not the spoon-fed false news that these rightists are spewing maybe you would think different

Good luck with all that.

All the best,

Ankh

a reply to: daskakik

You missed a thumb.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: LurkNoMore
How about this Q?

That is wrong. The real message is that Trump is comped and HRC is in control using skull to voice tech.

Ok, now that is pretty funny!

I have not kept up with the thread.
Has anyone seen the video of Bill and Hillary flying on a commercial flight?
True Pundit

originally posted by: EbbNFlow
You missed a thumb.

That is Trump's personal aide and he is standing beside the "I'm with her" symbol and giving the thumbs up to show he was the person who agreed/made it possible for HRC to take control.

a reply to: butcherguy

They sold their private jet and donated the proceeds to help the children. Released the secret service to cut government waste.

Hilary 2020!

OK, back from a hike.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

We have posted throughout this topic...

Can you define "We", please?

...you will eventually find them if you read through this topic

I have, and I'm not seeing anything that constitutes proof of Q being debunked.

Claims Hillary will be arrested, and then detained
Claimed North Korea Deal was done
claimed Iran is already controlled by "them" at one point and other times claims "Iran Next"
Claimed June the ETA for the truth about Seth Rich
Fake Antifa Flag
False Information about Antifa
Claims there will be Riots
the Latest faked images talked about
Rosenstein having a very bad day than a bad week... and keeps changing
The number of times "This next week" "Here comes the pain" etc goalpost is moved

Can you please include the post # for each claim you say Q has made that has been debunked? Full context is required to properly understand each claim.

Anonymous ID: pGukiFmX No.147567888 📁
Nov 1 2017 21:56:16 (EST)

On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out.

No one can prove whether POTUS gave the order or not. There is a possibility that he never did, for whatever reason. The term "slated to occur" does not mean that something will "absolutely" happen, only that it has been planned or scheduled to occur. Being that Hillary and the Podestas are well protected, I can imagine that both (among others), are actively doing what is necessary to prevent Q's "plan" from materializing.

originally posted by: eisegesis
No one can prove if POTUS gave the order. There is a possibility that he never did. The term "slated to occur" does not mean that something "will happen," only that it has been planned or scheduled to. Hillary and the Podestas are well protected. I can imagine that both are actively doing what they can to avoid having Q's plan materialize.

It doesn't matter if POTUS gave the order or not. Q says he did. If he didn't then Q is lying.

What was slated to occur were riots, the arrest announcement is given as a certainty.

There is a drop saying that Podesta's plane had been forced down, that went along with the drop above, that also never happened.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Alright, instead of spitting back at the posters, maybe you'd like to try to defend Antifa if you know so much.

originally posted by: EbbNFlow
a reply to: butcherguy

They sold their private jet and donated the proceeds to help the children. Released the secret service to cut government waste.

Hilary 2020!

LOL! They sold the jet because their pay for play scam is over and no one wants them anymore for overpaid speaking. They released the secret service so they cannot spy and report her further misdeeds.

a reply to: daskakik

It doesn't matter if POTUS gave the order or not. Q says he did.

Regarding post #34, "On POTUS’ order" was stated twice. The first order was acted on ("we have initiated"). The second order was never given because the arrest announcement was never made.

...the arrest announcement is given as a certainty.

It was not.

"...upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4)."

The term "actionable," does not imply that Podesta will be arrested or that an "arrest announcement" will be made on a specific date. Only that the arrest can be "acted on" or is "able to take place" on or after the date given. No announcement was made (for whatever reason), therefore, no second order was given by POTUS (not needed).

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: XAnarchistX

Alright, instead of spitting back at the posters, maybe you'd like to try to defend Antifa if you know so much.

Please don't encourage this kind of derailment. X has been asked to start his own thread several times and has yet, neglected to do so. His Antifa sermons are a distraction.

Any thoughts on what tomorrow brings?

A) Monday after Rod Rosenstein's deadline,
B) POTUS said he will reveal his recommendation for Supreme Court

originally posted by: eisegesis
Regarding post #34, "On POTUS’ order" was stated twice. The first order was acted upon ("we have initiated"). The second order was never given because the arrest announcement was never made.

No, the second mention is still in regards to riots:

Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out.

It was not.

"...upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4)."

Correct, it was the arrest announcement and it never happened.

The term "actionable," does not imply that Podesta will be arrested or that an "arrest announcement" will be made on any specific date. Only that the arrest can be "acted on" or that it's "able to take place" on or after the date given. No announcement was made (for whatever reason), therefore, no second order was given by POTUS (not needed).

I see you just disregarded the claim of Podesta's plane being forced down or drop #2 claiming "HRC detained, not arrested (yet)." which didn't seem to have happened or the riots that were "slated".

Then we have XAnarchistX 's point that if they could have "acted on" the arrest warrant, they have everything and still, months later, nothing has happened then it is either untrue or the current admin is complicit. Either way, it makes Q look bad.

a reply to: butcherguy

Quote from your article,

Assets frozen?

truepundit.com...

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: butcherguy

Quote from your article,

Assets frozen?

truepundit.com...

Yes, I read that.
I was under the impression that the Clintons liked to sponge their flights on other people’s private planes. Maybe that sort of thing has really dried up... a sign?