-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: TomLawless


To keep myself grounded and stable, I stay focused on the lower-level events/actions and leave the higher-level spiritual things to the ATS members who understand and appreciate them.

I look for clues from Q's messages. It's interesting that the longer you read them, the more you understand. It's like learning another language and culture. I'm thankful for that life experience, no matter what the final outcome.

Just something to toss out that's unrelated to Q, who has shown no interest in the U.S. Supreme Court, AFAIK.

Orrin Hatch let slip that Judge Amy Coney Barrett is replacing Anthony Kennedy.
www.foxnews.com...

Would a U.S. Senator know Trump's pick this far (3 days) in advance of the official 9pm Monday announcement? Hatch is pretty old too. He's retiring, with Mitt Romney (likely) replacing him.

a reply to: carewemust

I'm wondering if the reason Q doesn't say his name might be because of the families roots!

I looked into the surname Mccain.

At first I though of Cain killing Abel:

And Cain said to the Lord, "My punishment is too great to bear. 14Now that You have driven me this day from the soil I must hide from Your presence, I shall be a restless wanderer on the earth and whoever finds me will kill me." 15And the Lord said to him, "Therefore whoever kills Cain shall suffer sevenfold vengeance." And the Lord set a mark upon Cain so that whoever found him would not slay him."

Cain killed his brother because God preferred the gift of sacrificed sheep from Abel, to the gift of fruit from Cain!

Secondly, I found this Blog that details DNA analysis indicating McCains were progeny of the first King of the Scots:

one of the interesting facts we discovered is that we share the same paternal ancestry and a cluster of families all from what is now the parish of Kilmichael Glassary, which is located in mid Argyll. One of these families is well known in Scottish history, the Mac Ailpín family. Their lore, the primary sources, etc., say they descend from the famous figure of Coinneach Mac Ailpín, King of the Picts. He is also called the first King of Scots.

There is much lore an some scholarly disagreements on the nature and facts surrounding Coinneach Mac Ailpín, but there is also a body of factual data on the man. He was a Gael and king of Dál Riata and inherited the throne of Pictland through his Pictish mother. The Picts, for those not familiar with north British history, were a group of indigenous Celtic tribes that lived in what is now mid and northern Scotland.

The Picts wore blue war paint and are famous for their spiral art.

the McCains, i.e. clann Mhic Eain, are also descendants of the Indo-European tribes that migrated into western Europe from the Pontic Caspian Steepe. The dating of the time frame of this migration has firmed up due to new techniques in extracting viable Y chromosome data from skeletal remains. Tests on these remains from the Balkans west to Ireland, tell us when and how this migration took place. Our people reached what is now Ireland circa 2000 BC, or around 4,100 years before present.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


That's a fascinating find regarding the McCain lineage. But why avoid saying the name John McCain?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Good on JM there REL, they're all related.

Lineage may very well be a major part of it. The hierarchy of these systems per what we see versus what is real is often beyond distorted and DNA matters more then anything.

My guess is there something more Marine about it. He's a traitor, a liar, a fraud and a squealer according to the record at this point (I've seen that brain tumor experience first hand - he does not have it). I suspect the MI guys know the entire truth about him and he's the worst kind of military man: they are shunning him.

a reply to: carewemust

We've learned the comms, whoever came up with them. I'm confident of that.

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: carewemust

Q does it. Trump does it. That's I can say at this point, unfortunately. I feel like I don't know anything anymore.

T/L

I'll say one bit more as others are surely feeling the same thing. As we move through the new levels here, we are challenged, our "faith" so to speak is challenged. There is no harm in it, nor is it unreasonable and it is acceptable. I'm blown away at how folks given what they learned so far are hanging in. Provocateurs love the doubt btw....

This is no joke, and discovering all of this stuff, keeping pace, feeling new things and trying to put all together, while doing life is tough. Let it all sit, including life, Q says "enjoy the show" not "hate the show." So if it is less enjoyable, pop out for a drink and a laugh...

As Edog says, take a friend for coffee and have a laugh...

a reply to: crankyoldman

I know brain tumors too. My Dad had multiple mystery tumors, turned out to "benign", but they slowly debilitated him and killed him.

No way does No Name function the way he does with a grad four glioblastoma. Just my opinion. I could be wrong.

a reply to: carewemust

Why doesn't POTUS or Qsay his name? My gut feeling is that it has some religious connotation similar to "Don't call on Luci*er".

Just spitballing here but another option is that humans have names, so by refusing to call him by his name one is saying that he is not one.

a reply to: crankyoldman

In real life, I am an annoyingly huge Baseball geek. It doesn't help that my Cincinnati Redlegs have purposely tanked the last three seasons for draft picks, but I've watched maybe three games, and have yet to attend one in person. I just read constantly until I fall asleep. Yesterday I decided I need to get out with boys and watch a ballgame and drink too much. This is ridiculous. Work. Read. Sleep. Walk the dog. It has to change.

It's just so strange that you brought that up. Where We Go One, We Go All indeed.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Thank-you for sharing your gut-feeling based on the extensive research you've conducted. Very enlightening!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

In all things esoteric, Names have immense power.

People generally have lost the ability to see names as having power.

Next time you are with someone, try using their name more often and see how they respond.

We will likely be told at some point why it is so.

P

a reply to: carewemust

Minimal research really CWM... but I've grown to believe gut feelings/instinct are the result of objective subconscious analysis of facts we encounter.

Put simply, subconscious analysis is faster and more computer-like. It doesn't get as clouded with emotion or subjectivity.

ETA My research indicates that the original surname it derived from was Mac Ailein. I wonder if that in turn derived from "El"; with all the connotations that has.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: carewemust

Why doesn't POTUS or Qsay his name? My gut feeling is that it has some religious connotation similar to "Don't call on Luci*er".

Just spitballing here but another option is that humans have names, so by refusing to call him by his name one is saying that he is not one.

We Don't Say His Name
WDSHN
Widdershins
en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Love it TAT; that's a fascinating olde English word.

I was taught Chaucer by a teacher who could (and did) speak the language of the time
In the correct pronunciation. His lessons were great.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


That's a fascinating find regarding the McCain lineage. But why avoid saying the name John McCain?

Could have something to do with the "das Dossier".... and Comey ....

(noname) passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI

A few other things too.

🚬🔫

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

No-name..and by not calling said name, says to me that the person is
indeed known and not very favorably.
Every time this is mentioned , shivers of disdain are obvious.
This says that it is not subconscious, rather a given.....telling us
that Q is not kidding.
Leading back to Eisegesis ‘ question of the proving of doubt.
There are no coincidences says, to me, that there are correlations and
connections to all that is being laid out.

Exactly Rel.... gut feelings always prevail!

LC

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: crankyoldman

In real life, I am an annoyingly huge Baseball geek. It doesn't help that my Cincinnati Redlegs have purposely tanked the last three seasons for draft picks, but I've watched maybe three games, and have yet to attend one in person. I just read constantly until I fall asleep. Yesterday I decided I need to get out with boys and watch a ballgame and drink too much. This is ridiculous. Work. Read. Sleep. Walk the dog. It has to change.

It's just so strange that you brought that up. Where We Go One, We Go All indeed.

Yes, I get it, you are not alone at all

I'll share this story with you to illustrate something hugely fundamental with the Q process about perspective. I have a friend who is a very well known baseball guy (you'd know of him). We were at a game years ago. Two guys behind us, boston fans, were fans... Knowledgeable. They said xy and z about a pitcher's actions. I said to my friend, 'what's the real deal here?" The real explanation for every action taken in the game was not even close to the fan's perspective, not even close.

Q has a task, a brutal one, to give us perspective we didn't have before. But make no mistake, like my friend, Q's perspective, or rather the Q brain trust's perspective, is way up there. We're ground level which gives us insight, and most importantly stimulates personal growth, but Q's gang have the 40,000 foot perspective and more. After we get to see the archives we're going to chuckle at a lot of our ideas.

And off topic, the Mariners are frauds

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Don't forget... ANOTHER derivation of "no name" is 'Anonymous' (Anon).

a reply to: IAMTAT

... and an anagram could be "M.E. Anon" (Middle East Anon)