-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
Yep love it. And no one even thinks about questioning it.

Echo echo echo

Worst than that, nobody thinks of hitting the link and seeing that it is just some guy whose username is Q2, so there might be something to it but then again, maybe not.

a reply to: crankyoldman

The link isn't working for me. Can you check or respond where you found the transcript? I would like to read more, if there is more.

Thank you!

a reply to: carewemust

After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1 above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your client for any crime of violence.

 

From your link.

Notice the wording:

"about which this Office was made aware by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached Statement of Offense. "

So he only has immunity from crimes he disclosed to them.

If this prosecutor is somehow swampy and somehow trying to save members of congress as the title indicates they won't be able to get away with it.

They are being watched and recorded and anything nefarious they try to do is only digging a deeper hole.

I feel better reading the entire description of his immunity , it hints even more that he has been singing like crazy.

a reply to: IAMTAT

This was confusing to me from todays Daily Caller

Why would J P Comey at the table. Wouldn't this fall under current adm?

An assistant US attorney said Tuesday he would not prosecute Imran Awan, a former systems administrator for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other Democrats, for any crimes on Capitol Hill in a plea agreement that had him plead guilty to one count of bank fraud.

Only one person sat at the prosecutors’ table: J.P. Coomey, who unsuccessfully prosecuted New Jersey Democrat Sen. Bob Menendez for corruption and was only added to the case Monday. There was no sign of Michael Marando, who had previously led the prosecution.

Coomey did not object to the removal of Awan’s GPS monitor, said he would not oppose a sentence of probation, and agreed to drop charges against his wife, fellow former systems administrative Hina Alvi.

a reply to: liveandlearn

Hi, LL...
Different person.
Coomey...not Comey.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Speaking of ICE that reminds me of this thread that I read yesterday regarding illegal immigration and why most in congress don't want to pass immigration laws. It is always about the money.

Follow the money

Stumbled across this most succinct thread in the comment section of the above thread. A must read.

Follow the data and the money

originally posted by: MetalThunder

originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

If nobody will ask i guess it will be forced to be asked. What will media do now ?

Bold .... You have to love it.

Going to the link the person says the pic was ordered for them. Don't know from whom but the Q2 refers to him because his name is Quentin.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: liveandlearn

Hi, LL...
Different person.
Coomey...not Comey.

Ahh. Thank you. my bad. I noticed but it didn't trigger.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
a reply to: IAMTAT

Speaking of ICE that reminds me of this thread that I read yesterday regarding illegal immigration and why most in congress don't want to pass immigration laws. It is always about the money.

Follow the money

Stumbled across this most succinct thread in the comment section of the above thread. A must read.

Follow the data and the money

RosieMemos' thread was just brilliant research.
Wow. Thurgood Marshall Jr.
Looks like Clinton had her fingers in the detention centers too.

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: crankyoldman

The link isn't working for me. Can you check or respond where you found the transcript? I would like to read more, if there is more.

Thank you!

https:///hgW5q5Kx

originally posted by: MetalThunder
Quick question i am having difficulty getting answer to due to various factors - Was Martial Law ever ended after the Civil War ? Anyone ? Bueller !?

Forget it


this

2012 NDAA

The 2012 NDAA deemed the United States a “battlefield,” as Senator Lindsey Graham put it, and gave the president and his agents the right to seize and arrest any U.S. citizen, detain them indefinitely without charge or trial, and do so only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process. The new Executive Order states that the president and his secretaries have the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States. The Government can also forcibly draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill “labor requirements” for the purposes of “national defense.” There is not even any Congressional oversight allowed, only briefings.

www.whitehouse.gov...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Yes it was. I check her out everyday. She has some great research.
Wow was the word I used also. Still picking my jaw up off the floor. The corruption is so deep it is mind boggling.
I said once before somewhere in one of these threads that no matter where I research I always find a link to her. Cranky's comment about her being a "piece but a Big piece" makes sense.

Cranky:
I think Italy is a big part of the human trafficking network also according to my research. All hidden in plain sight literally. They do love their WEIN!

originally posted by: Enderdog

originally posted by: MetalThunder
Quick question i am having difficulty getting answer to due to various factors - Was Martial Law ever ended after the Civil War ? Anyone ? Bueller !?

Forget it


this

2012 NDAA

The 2012 NDAA deemed the United States a “battlefield,” as Senator Lindsey Graham put it, and gave the president and his agents the right to seize and arrest any U.S. citizen, detain them indefinitely without charge or trial, and do so only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process. The new Executive Order states that the president and his secretaries have the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States. The Government can also forcibly draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill “labor requirements” for the purposes of “national defense.” There is not even any Congressional oversight allowed, only briefings.

www.whitehouse.gov...

I remember when the questionable NDAA came out, people pointed out - those who bothered to read it, that it allowed for anyone anywhere to be detained without charges for however long for any reason. Folks came on here and PLEADED it did not say that at all, and the plebes just didn't understand. Except the government legal suits (ergo Hillary government goons) went to court to argue that it said just that - no habeus corpus: a form of martial law.

Here is the larger truth. The government of the past is a dictator, so martial law exists. Two declared wars: Drugs and Poverty pretty much mean that if you are not in, they can bury you or take your children. 500k missing kids a year means... Recourse for the rich, maybe, but for the 99 percent of humans, it means we've been under martial law in a different form and people, evidently, like it.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
a reply to: IAMTAT

Speaking of ICE that reminds me of this thread that I read yesterday regarding illegal immigration and why most in congress don't want to pass immigration laws. It is always about the money.

Follow the money

Stumbled across this most succinct thread in the comment section of the above thread. A must read.

Follow the data and the money

And I found yet another thread within the first. Three 2 min vids telling how illegals came in at night, given a SS #, encouraged to have a long term disability, given housing, Medicaid, welfare, and cash

Had seen the above during the O adm. Don't know if it still happens.

What a sick world. Money for all except mid and lower income citizens.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
a reply to: IAMTAT

Speaking of ICE that reminds me of this thread that I read yesterday regarding illegal immigration and why most in congress don't want to pass immigration laws. It is always about the money.

Follow the money

Stumbled across this most succinct thread in the comment section of the above thread. A must read.

Follow the data and the money

W/C Agree Italy, VERY VERY dark, old world negativity. Cleansing now...

Everyone knows Cranky's "read the damn docs" by now these posts fit. A basic look at the physical world instead of the teeeeeveeee world says something 180.

And these docs are PERFECTLY juxtaposed with that Oakland report on ICE's raid. It shows the ignorance born of decades of CIA control and even worse, the media's PERFECT system of mind control.

link

The report is given, with only the last line, quietly spoken (long after people have stopped listening) "ICE will only say it is a human trafficking raid." With Q glasses old school Pravda stories were more skillfully done.

who let Awan go?

About that judge... The judge in the Awan case, Tanya Chutkan, was appointed to the D.C. US District Court by President Obama on June 5, 2014, after Chutkan had contributed to him for years.

Prior to her appointment to the District Court, she was a partner at law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner (BSF) where she represented scandal-plagued biotechnology company Theranos - which hired Fusion GPS to threaten the news media. Because of this, Chutkan had to recuse herself from two cases involving Fusion GPS. Meanwhile, BSF attorney and crisis management expert Karen Dunn - who prepped Hillary Clinton for debates and served as Associate White House Counsel to Obama - represents Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Another BSF attorney, Dawn Smalls, was John Podesta's assistant while he was Obama's Chief of Staff. And if you still had doubts over their politics, BSF also republished an article critical of Donald Trump in their "News & Events" section. In short, the Judge in the Awan case - appointed by Obama after years of contributing to him, was a partner at a very Clinton-friendly law firm. It should also be noted that Obama appointed Chutkan's husband, Peter Krauthammer, to the D.C. Superior Court in 2011.

www.zerohedge.com...

Can someone please explain to me how letting Awan go fits in the plan? TIA

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Did I miss the part where they demanded she be arrested?

I need to watch that again.

Just went to Youtube.
It's from June 20.

And we don't need a second SC. Huber is doing just fine.

originally posted by: Aallanon
Can someone please explain to me how letting Awan go fits in the plan? TIA

I dont think that doing a deal with him that prevents him from being prosecuted for "other stuff" fits the plan at all. Considering months of talk around Awan, it would have to count as a loss for Qsters, unless there is something I'm not seeing.