-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: butcherguy

If you just want to read the drops I recommend. qanon.pub...

It sounds like you want to read the interpretations of the Q drops... unless they are negative. Happy thoughts only?

a reply to: LurkNoMore

Why are you directing this at me?

Dashen made a post to me with his PROOF that Q had insider knowledge. I debunked it. And then everyone got mad at me.

Couldn't make it up.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

Admit I was deceived?

Have you not read the dozen-or-so posts where I am still wondering if this is all a ploy to round up political subversives.

a reply to: dashen

Yeah... I also read the one where you tried to post this as proof. Did you forget it already?

Do you have other examples that I asked from Pixel regards to his claim that Q posts similar terms BEFORE the president?

a reply to: BringMeThanos

There's that one where Q calls Adam Schiff a leaker pretty much a month to the day before Trump does a tweet

a reply to: IAMTAT
Hi IAMTAT,
In reply to your posting on the thread that got closed.....
Expect Commie-Democrats' counter-measures:
-- Hillary and George Soros are way above the law.*
-- Count on George Soros to pay the salaries and per-diem for Mexican nationals to vote in our elections.
-- Mainstream media, especially CNN, will condemn the GOP and direct low information voters.
-- The Democrats will use Saul Alinsky rules to "destroy" their opposition.
-- The Clinton Death List (silencing witnesses) has been 100% successful.

* They are the among the highest above-the-law non-elected/non-appointed officials in the history of the world.
Immune to arrest, immune to prosecution, immune to investigation.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

You rained on their parade.
Leave them in their little fantasy world. This isn't the place to make a stand. They're in too deep.

a reply to: Sillyolme

nvm

a reply to: MetalThunder

How do you know when someone logs off?


These excuses and paranoia to discredit me is getting ridiculous.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I am curious as to what the general perspective regarding the Kim Clements prophecies have had in regards to Q? Often times it does seem Q has a religious bent.

I am curious since toysforadults created a recent thread on these prophecies on Trump and in doing some digging I found Clements 2006 prophecy on Hillary Clinton.

Link to my actual post on thread

Has Q ever suggested that Hillary will redeem herself? If these prophecies are accurate, there may very well be a truer purpose for her. In the videos shared, an annnointed woman of great faith rises up. Cartels will shake with fear. schools are safe.

Also, predicted another Snowden will appear. Curious if this could be in reference to Q or Seth Rich?

I would appreciate if you or any of the other awesome researchers here could share some input. Or even just say it is absolutely rediculous.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Fact is this parade needs a little raining on every once in awhile.
If this can conclusively be proven to be false then that is what must be done.
If this stuff doesn't stand up to rigorous inquiry then it is worthless.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I think some people are right... my approach isn't right.

I just hope some people in this thread will look at the debunk and realise that this certain Q claim was BS.

nvmd

Dashen posted a Q Proof.

User: Debunks Q Proof and shows evidence of why its incorrect.

Community: TROLL TROLL TROLL

Even Dashen has said its necessary to have "rigorous inquiry". The fact is my last few posts have been far more ON TOPIC than the rest of you who've come in to complain about me.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

I'm a long time reader of ATS threads, for years...

If you say so...

I've gone through EVERY Q drop and there isn't any proof or precognition.

You claim to have "gone through EVERY Q drop".

Do you also claim to have deciphered "EVERY Q drop" as intended?

originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: BringMeThanos

I'm a long time reader of ATS threads, for years...

If you say so...

I've gone through EVERY Q drop and there isn't any proof or precognition.

You claim to have "gone through EVERY Q drop".

Do you also claim to have deciphered "EVERY Q drop" as intended?

Do you not believe me?

I've read every Q drop... can't recall everything off the top of my head. And have gone through all 8 threads, again I probably didn't retain everything I read.

Intended by who? I know a cold reading scam when I see one. Fishing lines are thrown out with plenty of buzzwords to call back on.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Several NEW Q Posts up:
qanon.pub...

Finally, something to get us out of the mud.

So Q is claiming to have a Server which somehow will prove 5 EYES Data not shared through "official channels". Seems to point out NZ in particular. Most of the other discussions were around the UK of doing the dirty lifting for the Obama Admin on the Trump/Russian Collusion.

From what we know of the Spies/assets that tried to get into the Trump Campaign, all Roads lead to the UK in some manner.

What's NZ's part in all of this.