-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

originally posted by: IAMTAT
People may be losing interest in this thread.
Maybe it's because of the pages and pages of back and forth bickering...resolving nothing and producing only more pages and pages of back and forth bickering.

Maybe I'm wrong.

You are correct.

Still holding out for an intelligent, cohesive counter-argument.

I'm a patient man.

Maybe I'll but together a test and pass around Scantron sheets just so I know where everyone stands.

a reply to: iamthegoat

More stuff less fluff....

Makes digging into this crap even more frustrating, and sometimes I think that's the point. Drive people away with constant bickering and drivel.

I Agree. I've tried to work the skeptics into the discussion, but it's a mobius strip of futility.

Things work better when we have posts or topics to dig into.

I wouldn't invest my time if I wasn't truly interested in finding out more about the topics Q poses. Seems odd that some do seem to like that. That's fine, but it hurts all the new people or the watchers of these threads as nobody likes to watch a Btch fest

I'll just power through these snow drifts in the road.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: pavil

Honestly, I can't think of anything in the Q drops that was an eye opener and I have read each one so it isn't lack of interest. Maybe there really isn't anything new in them? Do you have any off the top of your head?

Angela Merkel/Hitler connection. True or not it was very "whoa"

I know that someone already posted about the 19 ICE investigators call for agency to be disbanded in letter amid 'abolish ICE' protests (but i'm having difficulty finding the post) reading the article at first glance it appears as though these 19 folks are taking the side of the abolishing ICE due to rhetoric etc.... but the interesting thing I got out of the article is that they are in fact bringing more awareness to the real issues:

HSI is “supposed to be out there making these major cases, these big cartels that are smuggling guns, drugs, money,” Alonzo Peña, a former ICE deputy director, told the Texas Observer. “And because of this whole immigration rhetoric — that immigrants are bad, that they’re criminals and rapists and all that — the focus is totally off mission.” The agents, who work to combat things like drugs and arms trafficking, wrote that their investigations “have been perceived as targeting undocumented aliens, instead of the transnational criminal organizations that facilitate cross border crimes impacting our communities and national security.”

The letter suggests splitting ICE into two separate agencies that focus separately on homeland security and deportation, which the agents say would “improve transparency, efficiency and effectiveness.”

Bold emphasis mine
So in effect, the headline itself is misleading because it is purporting that these 19 ICE agents are calling for it to be disbanded, which by including the phrase "amid calls to abolish", it leads one to think that even the ICE agents are on board.

This is not the case though when you read the entire the article and see that they want to split it into two orgs so that each can focus on the seperate issues with more force & focus.

The agents’ letter, first reported by the Texas Observer, expressed concern that President Trump’s crackdown on undocumented migrants has made it more difficult for them to conduct investigations into significant national security issues.

Again, bold emphasis mine.

To me, this will only serve to highlight the drug/human/etc trafficking taking place at the border.

a reply to: pavil

You just tried to have a discussion and then ran away from it when asked to show something from Q that was eye opening.

You don't even believe it yourself.

Don't start something and then backoff. I answered your questions as honestly and civil as possible. You refused to provide the same answers and resorted to personal insult. Maybe you should take a look in the mirror.

a reply to: Jusvistn

I noticed that too, the discrepancy between the headline and the meat of the article. They just want two branches, so specialist can focus on their specialized tasks.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Yeah I get that, but... "true or not" ... I don't really "whoa" at things that I don't believe are true.

Thats getting excited over fantasy, things you want to be true because it would be interesting.

DECODES of Q Post 1662 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...


GUCCIFER/FLORIDA Method
KEYLETTER = "Q"
RESULT = "ie-ma"
INTERPRETATION = "In example, Master"?
MA from ACRONYMFINDER.COM

KEYLETTER = "q"
RESULT = "us"

TIMESTAMP TO ACRONYM
Method 1 = use both digits in each of hour, minute, seconds and apply Modulo 26 to get A to Z letters
Result = NWY from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = "Never Without You" - i.e. pat on back to us as Washington Times would never have printed the quoted article without support of the Great Awoken.

Method 2 = add digits in each of hour, minute, seconds as appropriate to get A to Z letters
Result = EEF from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = Exponentially Embedded Family (seriously, check in link in line above!)

a reply to: daskakik

Also, the original claim is that Q is real. That is for those upholding that claim to prove not for skeptics to disprove. All we can do is post why we are not convinced.

You are absolutely wrong on this point.

If a theoretical physicist presents his or her theory on some aspect of the known universe, presents mathematical proofs, and has 10 other physisists who subscribe to and agree with the mathematical models presented, those that disagree with the theory would be expected to do more than just argue that they are incorrect.

Those who disagreed would be expected to present an alternate theory, and or prove that the math is wrong. That would include real numbers and perhapse the work of others in part or in whole that disproves the first theory.

The sceptic shouldn't just talk louder, that doesn't disprove the original theory.

There are a lot of sources that are ripe to present here regarding weather Q is, as you say, real (I think you actually mean to say, the what Q is, but we know what you mean). So why not link and quote them? I'm sure we'd be willing to debate the merits of those sources, and the findings of the authors.

The skeptic does have a responsibility to present an alternat explaination regarding the nature of Q (reality of Q), the motives, the motivation, who you think Q really is...

Clinging to a single word of syntax in a post by someone who supports the thory that Q is an insider close to POTUS is not a counterpoint. It is, as you say far too often, weak sauce.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Ok so if you enter a room full of people who tell you that Santa Claus is real and visits them everyday YOU would be expected to debunk it before requesting proof from said people?

What a ridiculous argument. Just because you've all grouped together and convinced yourself something is true doesn't mean the burden is on someone else to disprove it, you have to present evidence that it exists for it to be debunked.




*or to continue your analogy... Q supporters are missing the "math" to support their claim. Skeptics are asking for this math so they can test its theory/debunk if necessary. Q supporters avoiding presenting this "math" instead expecting the skeptics to find it themselves and then getting angry that they even asked.

DECODES of Q Post 1665 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...


GUCCIFER/FLORIDA Method
KEYLETTER = "Q"
RESULT = "etQ"
INTERPRETATION = "...and Q"?

KEYLETTER = "q"
RESULT = "A"
Interpretation = "Anon" because cartoon shows Anon within Q in center of pic

TIMESTAMP TO ACRONYM
Method 1 = use both digits in each of hour, minute, seconds and apply Modulo 26 to get A to Z letters
Result = TTY from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = "Thanks To You" - ie pat on back to us growing in size enough for MSM to have to feed that market.

Method 2 = add digits in each of hour, minute, seconds as appropriate to get A to Z letters
Result = BJF from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = EITHER "Brian Jordan Foundation (Atlanta, GA)",
OR "BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg) Jachthoorn Federatie (Dutch; horn federation)"

COVFEFE Method
KEYWORD = "Thank you Ben" - matches columns width
RESULT = "NHV"
INTERPRETATION = New Haven (Amtrak station code; New Haven, CT) - this could point to a TRAIN FALSE FLAG?

KEYWORD = "We rather enjoyed this one."
RESULT = "QEO"
INTERPRETATION = "Q Executive Order" - are there any new EOs near time of this post?

KEYWORD = "WWG1WGA!"
RESULT = "QQV"
INTERPRETATION = ??

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Q2 victory

originally posted by: CoramDeo
If a theoretical physicist presents his or her theory on some aspect of the known universe, presents mathematical proofs, and has 10 other physisists who subscribe to and agree with the mathematical models presented, those that disagree with the theory would be expected to do more than just argue that they are incorrect.

That isn't the scenario, though.

You don't have mathematical proofs and a lot of people say they are still on the fence so it seems like most people don't fully subscribe.

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
Interesting video from two prominent Trump supporters.

Isn't Isaac Green the one who made the video discussing the UniRock investigation that presented an admission by a Baker from 4/8Chan admitting that a group of anons were behind the Q posts.

Not sure if i can link Pastebin here, but the email with the claims and apologies are still there.

The only thing I would question regarding this is that in the text of the email used as the sole proof that Q is a LARP that was started by a group of anons and has been hijacked by Pamphlet anon is that there is only one voice making this admission, QBRD_BAKER.

If there was a battle going, as the email says, regarding who was in control of the tripcodes, the narrative, etc., don't you think there would be other pissed off named/unnamed sources? I mean, QBRD_BAKER admits that the long game was to monitize the movement. I'm guessing that the other bakers who lost out would want to take down the whole operation by coming clean, alone, or collectively.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

The source was Sorcha Faal, so besides not really being "whoa", I have to ask, didn't anyone investigate?

Seems to be another swing and miss by Q.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Interpretation = EITHER "Brian Jordan Foundation (Atlanta, GA)", OR "BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg) Jachthoorn Federatie (Dutch; horn federation)"

Be lgian couple arrested in plot to bomb Iranian opposition event attended by Giuliani, Gingrich (bold emphasis mine)

I don't know what/how you do these, but i appreciate all of your hard work. Thank you!

DECODES of Q Post 1664 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...


GUCCIFER/FLORIDA Method
KEYLETTER = "Q"
RESULT = " nate eaMeri"
INTERPRETATION = ?

KEYLETTER = "q"
RESULT = "rKte"
INTERPRETATION = ?

TIMESTAMP TO ACRONYM
Method 1 = use both digits in each of hour, minute, seconds and apply Modulo 26 to get A to Z letters
Result = TML from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = Any of: Tomolo (tomorrow), Telecommunications Markup Language, or
Trans Manche Link - ie Channe tunnel between UK/France that Eurostar trains run through!

Method 2 = add digits in each of hour, minute, seconds as appropriate to get A to Z letters
Result = BDK from ACRONYMFINDER.COM
Interpretation = "BLACK DISCIPLE KILLERS" OR "BAD DESIGN KILLS". latter could refer to compromised components in trains/planes/busses

COVFEFE Method
KEYWORD = "FAKE NEWS!"
RESULT = "ZDLWOBXKM"
INTERPRETATION = "Zero Delay Lockout, Waste Of Breath, cross, Knights of Malta"
ZDL
WOB
KM (note also many games forums in this list!)

a reply to: Aallanon

Thanks Ail... that's an intriguing possibility since posted on 1st July.

a reply to: daskakik

That isn't the scenario, though.

You don't have mathematical proofs and a lot of people say they are still on the fence so it seems like most people don't fully subscribe.

The lack of mathematical proofs doesn't negate the fact that there is an ongoing theory that Q is an insider close to the president and that they are presenting information, or providing pointers to information that illuminates the dark underbelly of those who pull the levers of power in the US and WW. Math is just a language. The proofs don't need to be numbers, and you know that. I know your smarter than that.

I'm not sure that I'm entirely sold on the nature of Q, so I would be a fence sitter. Is Q MI, a true insider in the admin, POTUS, a very svy journalist on the Right or group of journalists on the right, an AI experiment...not sure.

I think your beef is with the nature of Q when you say is Q real or fake. You don't believe Q is an insider, so you should be digging up infor that supports your theory regarding the nature of Q.

I mean, the Earth isn't round...Why?...Because its not round...is not an answer.

a reply to: Jusvistn

Cheers Jusvistn. PM me if you want explanations of each method but basically it's mostly auto-decoded in the spreadsheet I post from time to time:

COVFEFE uses Magic Squares

Guccifer/Florida method picks out every Nth letter of the post (Q=17th, q=49th)

Timestamp to Acronym just takes the time Q posted and convert each of Hours, minutes, seconds into a letter - then look up acronym definitions for that string of letters