It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
So has trump ever attended such? Will he be at the cremation of care? So many questions surrounding the group since all the high profile gov. officials that have attended in the past. I have searched but there is zilch about the group and trump. It seems like if he is not attending then maybe we could get some inside info as to past actions of the group.
Anyhow it just seems odd that so much power has gone somewhat quiet.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: olaru12
Seems like you have things mixed up. The Bilderbergers were never mentioned by the OP
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: olaru12
Seems like you have things mixed up. The Bilderbergers were never mentioned by the OP
my money is on johnny bolton to be a member of bushes group the skull and bones
post-truth is an assertion of ideological supremacy by which its practitioners try to compel someone to believe something regardless of the evidence. Yet post-truth didn't begin with the 2016 election; the denial of scientific facts about smoking, evolution, vaccines, and climate change offers a road map for more widespread fact denial. Add to this the wired-in cognitive biases that make us feel that our conclusions are based on good reasoning even when they are not, the decline of traditional media and the rise of social media, and the emergence of fake news as a political tool, and we have the ideal conditions for post-truth.
Post-truth politics (also called post-factual politics[1] and post-reality politics[2]) is a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored. Post-truth differs from traditional contesting and falsifying of facts by relegating facts and expert opinions to be of secondary importance relative to appeal to emotion. While this has been described as a contemporary problem, some observers have described it as a long-standing part of political life that was less notable before the advent of the Internet and related social changes.