It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
It would be only fair to send those refugees to the countries that wrecked Iraq and Libya.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: rickymouse
That is one area where my view has always been a little more suspicious of their true intent than other peoples. I have always felt that one muslim is a very quiet timid creature. Two are more confident. Three have a voice. Four have an agenda. Five start forcing change because they know the real number is much higher.
When they are outnumbered and they know it, they are very quiet timid people. As soon as they perceive an advantage their true nature and agenda start to appear. We just witnessed it repeatedly in Europe over the last three to four years. Is there anyone left who will still try to deny that is their method and goal? I don't think so...
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: rickymouse
That is what people keep saying but I don't buy it any more. We have all seen the evidence that things are as I described them earlier. When muslims are the minority they are quiet timid people. The more their numbers grow the more bold they become until they have sufficient forces to initiate change by whatever means necessary. The muslim religion is built around the concept of constant expansion. The primary goal of the devout is to convert the non-believers or deliver them to allah for judgement. There is no compromise there. Any muslim who does not adhere to this most basic demand of the religion will be the first against the wall. Either they sweep across the border with swords swinging through the air demanding conversion or beheading the infidels who resist, or, they slowly quietly invade until they sufficient numbers to affect local politics, then they initiate sharia law and establish no-go zones. Either way, their goal is to invade and conquer. Nowhere in their religion does assimilation to a foreign host ring true. It simply isn't done.
originally posted by: toysforadults
I've been reaching out to Europeans for the last several months abd they arent happy.
Nationalism is on the rise in Europe.
See my thread on the Uranus transit.
The Parallel Society experiment has failed. Is it wrong to want to preserve your national heritage and way of life?
However when the truth is that your alleged "religion" comes with not just professed but expressed belief and act that separates people into classes based upon whether they agree with you or, even worse, whether they are of one sex or the other then you've crossed the line from religion into political ideological activity that the civilized world ruled unacceptable a long time ago.
Slavery by any means is still slavery. "Dhimmitude" is by definition illegal to the extent it is practiced in any form with the force of law. If such is part of some alleged religion's "holy text" and remains and is practiced that is not a religion at all; it is a violent political ideology and representing otherwise is a lie.
You cannot make me sit in a pew or pray on a mat next to you; I have the right to refuse. Further, I can consent today and refuse tomorrow; a choice of religion which I am free to adopt or leave as I wish. To lay sanction of any form, particularly but not exclusively in the form of extortion or violence, as a result of my election is a gross violation of fundamental human rights that precede government and thus cannot be subsumed or violated by same.
Kurt Jonassohn and Karin Solveig Björnson describe the Albigensian Crusade as "the first ideological genocide"
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Vroomfondel
The Albigensian Crusade?
Kurt Jonassohn and Karin Solveig Björnson describe the Albigensian Crusade as "the first ideological genocide"
Given that mindset, you folks should nuke the Russians asap. It's the Huns, essentially. Attila maybe? Whatever. Could you at least try to pipe up on our white, and allegedly christian, heritage before you spread the ignorance for political reasons?
Canadian Imam says Islamic Law to be implemented when Muslims are majority
We can’t apply it (sharia) unless we are the majority and the majority agree, then we can apply it (sharia) , if the majority don’t agree even we’re all Muslims, but the majority don’t agree to apply Sharia to try to apply it is to unleash bloodshed in the Muslim nation [Ummah], because Muslims will fight you.
They do NOT assimilate to other cultures.
...
But yeah, its all because us white Christians went over there a few years ago and messed things up
they are going to initiate sharia law here as soon as they can
The Power of Nightmares, subtitled The Rise of the Politics of Fear, written and produced by Adam Curtis. Details the rise of the American NEOCONS (Neo-Conservative/Israeli movement and Radical Islam, with comparisons on their origins and strong similarities. Curtis argues that the threat of radical Islamism as a massive, sinister organized force of destruction, specifically in the form of Al-Qaeda, (& its later offshoots ISIS, Boko Haram, Free Syrian Army, etc),is in fact a myth perpetrated by politicians in many countries—and particularly American warmongering NeoCons and their enablers.