It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Social democracy is a political, social and economic ideology that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and capitalist economy. The protocols and norms used to accomplish this involve a commitment to representative and participatory democracy; measures for income redistribution and regulation of the economy in the general interest; and welfare state provisions
In political and social sciences, communism is the philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money and the state.
Imperialism is a policy that involves a nation extending its power by the acquisition of lands by purchase, diplomacy or military force.
John A. Hobson, A leading English Liberal, developed a highly influential interpretation of Imperialism: A Study (1902) that expanded on his belief that free enterprise capitalism had a negative impact on the majority of the population. In Imperialism he argued that the financing of overseas empires drained money that was needed at home. It was invested abroad because lower wages paid the workers overseas made for higher profits and higher rates of return, compared to domestic wages. So although domestic wages remained higher, they did not grow nearly as fast as they might have otherwise. Exporting capital, he concluded, put a lid on the growth of domestic wages in the domestic standard of living.[
In 1914 Kautsky published an article on imperialism, which subsequently was translated into English and published in the USA. In these he argued, there could be a way out of direful wars among the imperialist powers, a solution now named "Ultraimperialismus" or "super-imperialism".
Kautsky elucidated this thought in the September 1914 issue of Die Neue Zeit. He described the current phase of capitalism as imperialism. In Marxist theory, imperialism consists of capitalist states superexploiting labour in agrarian regions in order to increase both the imperialist nation's productivity and their market. However, imperialism also required capitalist states to introduce protectionist measures and to defend their empires militarily. He believed that this was the ultimate cause of World War I.
Kautsky noted that before the War, while industrial accumulation had continued, exports had dropped, as a result of a tendency of industry to expand out of proportion to agriculture. He pointed out that growing nationalism in the more industrially advanced colonies would necessitate a continuation of the arms race after the War, and that should this occur, economic stagnation would worsen.
In Kautsky's view, the only one way in which capitalists would be able to maintain the basic system, while avoiding this stagnation, would be for the wealthiest nations to form a "cartel", in the same manner as which banks had co-operated, agreeing to limit their competition and renounce their arms race, in order to maintain their export markets and their systems of super exploitation. In doing so, he postulated that war and militarism were not essential features of capitalism, and that a peaceful capitalism was possible
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
well our empire is winning, so I am ok with it. If somebody else's empire was winning, than we would be losing. Do you want to be the losing side?? I don't think anybody wants to be the loser.
More and more each day we see the stripping of rights, and the call to limit freedoms in the name of democracy, but everything that's being shouted for resembles none of that. Democracy is a lie that these people are believing in. What these people are calling for is nothing less then Global Imperialism.
The funniest thing was when at the close of the Spanish-American War the United States paid poor decrepit old Spain $20,000,000 for the Philippines. It was just a case of this country buying its way into good society. Honestly, when I read in the papers that this deal had been made, I laughed until my sides ached. There were the Filipinos fighting like blazes for their liberty. Spain would not hear to it. The United States stepped in, and after they had licked the enemy to a standstill, instead of freeing the Filipinos they paid that enormous amount for an island which is of no earthly account to us; just wanted to be like the aristocratic countries of Europe which have possessions in foreign waters. The United States wanted to be in the swim, and it, too, had to branch out, like an American heiress buying a Duke or an Earl. Sounds well, but that's all.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Guyfriday
Do you mean like Soros who is sticking his nose into the UK trying to campaign for a second Brexit referendum?
Do you mean like the unelected European Commission who are playing hard ball and desperate to punish Britain if/when we leave the EU?
Those kinds of thoughts I can identify with, even Obama interfered in our referendum saying Britain should stay in the EU, the cheeky twat.
Yep, from the scaremongering, to the threats, and now Soros backing a second referendum, I'd definitely agree that globalists somewhere behind the scenes are pulling the strings.
If/when we leave the EU we are going to be spanked, that is for sure...a lesson for any other nation thinking of trying to leave the firm.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Guyfriday
Some people have their football or their cars or sneakers and others got their video games. I enjoy global live action chess.
I want us to win. Us winning is good for everybody, even Australia. Especially Australia. Don't you want Australia to win too?
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Guyfriday
I'd say definitely keep an eye on developments with Britain leaving the EU though, we are doing the exact opposite of 'globalisation' breaking off to be independent again. If we get stopped then it will prove to me that we are held hostage in the global gang.
...but we will be spanked if we eventually leave, I'm certain of that but say bring it on. A lot of people who I know voted to remain are now thinking the same due to the threats from the EU, and will vote leave if there was to be a second referendum.
I think it would be a higher margin win as well, nothing like threatening Britain to get Brits to pull together against 'the enemy'.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
You should be thankful, knuckle dragging thugs are the one And only reason America ns can even enjoy the life of luxury even our poor can afford to take for granted compared to more than half the Earth's human population. Even if we All want to pretend to be righteously outraged at the attrocities that make the resources available to us for this wonderful life.