New report reveals even more freaky details about the UFO that shocked the US Navy

Here is an article explaining (more in depth) about the carrier based F-18 pilots and the carrier task group who were featured in the New York Times article.. Just a few more details for those who might be interested. This is the linked pdf file : media.lasvegasnow.com...

The report (PDF here) explains in great details how a US Navy aircraft carrier played a strange game of hide and seek with multiple Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) that demonstrated flight characteristics that should be downright impossible to pull off.

In the new report, the object is described as “solid white, smooth, with no edges,” and being “uniformly colored with no nacelles, pylons, or wings.” The report says the object was estimated to be about 46 feet long. By comparison, the F/A-18 fighters that were trailing it measure around 56 feet in length, meaning that whatever it was that the Navy spotted could feasibly hold one or more human-sized individuals.

That is the first time I have read of a guesstimate of the actual size of the object.. But... I really do not follow or research this stuff all that much..

Throughout the several days of seeing the object come and go, the Navy says it may have demonstrated the ability to “cloak” and disappear to the human eye. Its rapid descent from 60,000 feet to just 50 feet before disappearing also made officials consider the possibility that it was capable of operating underwater, effortlessly moving from the air to the sea at will.

Many many reports of USOs so why not ?
bgr.com...

a reply to: 727Sky

I hope this starts leading to something big.

It would be great.

a reply to: 727Sky

A few interesting things about this report (including some problems and inconsistencies) have been pointed out by various ATS members in this thread.

A brief summary of the issues in question can be found here. I think this is worth mentioning in order to add some "context" to this publication (if that's what we can call it).

However, the lack of any identifying references, official stamps, who the intended recipients and even an author and their status are very strange and throw huge doubts on its credibility.
Source

a reply to: 727Sky
This seems like a duplicate thread to me. The original thread is here:

BREAKING: Pentagon Releases Declassified 13 Page 2004 Tic Tac UFO Analysis...AAV Not From Earth
It refers to the same document, though the OP could have posted the pdf link in the OP but Kandinsky posted it for him a few posts later.

originally posted by: highvein
I hope this starts leading to something big.

It would be great.

It depends if they come in peace, or come to feast on our livers.

We'll never know, because in this case the PDF document seems to be a fake to me. The narrative is not an official report. It's what someone would like an official report to say. I doubt, for example that an official report would reference Wikipedia.

originally posted by: paraphi

originally posted by: highvein
I hope this starts leading to something big.

It would be great.

It depends if they come in peace, or come to feast on our livers.

We'll never know, because in this case the PDF document seems to be a fake to me. The narrative is not an official report. It's what someone would like an official report to say. I doubt, for example that an official report would reference Wikipedia.

Shhhh,,,,,your statement is too logical.
Tone it down

a reply to: paraphi

remember, when they come, they will eat the fat one's first.

I'm screwed.

a reply to: 727Sky

Seems like the report has some authentication issues.

This brought on the thought... Maybe the US Gov can't tell us anything about aliens because they simply don't know anything other than sightings like this. Maybe they never made contact. Maybe they can't because these things just blink in and out of our sight at will. How would we capture something like this? How would we contact something like this?


Seems like the only way we could is if one really did crash. If they're that far advanced, I would highly doubt any of them really did or even could crash, especially without some serious mothership backup to pick up the pieces before we even got on sight.

Such an advancement, they could be here all they wanted and we couldn't do anything about it.

a reply to: StallionDuck

And what about the uncountable testimonies about former agents of the government claiming that they know all about them, and even made a pact with them?

I find both hypothesis extremely ok to believe. We know nothing and all our assumptions were wrong before.

Why not now?

db

I recall seeing a video a while back of planes and a helicopter chasing an amphibious UFO near a fishing boat in the Mediterranean or something.

youtu.be...

Without even looking, I can tell you that it's a new experimental craft, and it could literally be any nation or aeronautics manufacturer in the world. They often perform tests in hostile airspace, either to test a new craft or to gauge our capabilities. It could be reconnaissance from an enemy nation, but that's worst case scenario.

Antigrav was made during the Nazi era and subsequently very well suppressed (most of us know this), so it could be an antigrav craft.

-NR

originally posted by: NaturalRegressor
Without even looking, I can tell you that it's a new experimental craft, and it could literally be any nation or aeronautics manufacturer in the world. They often perform tests in hostile airspace, either to test a new craft or to gauge our capabilities. It could be reconnaissance from an enemy nation, but that's worst case scenario.

Antigrav was made during the Nazi era and subsequently very well suppressed (most of us know this), so it could be an antigrav craft.

-NR

Finally someone simplifies things properly...anyone canbuild a neutral dimension craft...anyone....and anyone can own or fly one .....and I don't mean only multi-billionaires....I mean literally anyone who wants to invest as much moneyas it takes to buy a new car can finance and build their own craft.....research David Hamel and Searl and all the other people who have already shown us how these craft work and can be built.

a reply to: one4all

Then build one.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: one4all

Then build one.

How do you know I haven't.

a reply to: one4all

Post up those YouTube videos of what it can do.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: one4all

Post up those YouTube videos of what it can do.

No one believes YT videos...methinks you need to be personally picked up for a ride...and I dont think you can afford the fare.

originally posted by: drewlander
I recall seeing a video a while back of planes and a helicopter chasing an amphibious UFO near a fishing boat in the Mediterranean or something.

youtu.be...

Any idea what they are saying in that video?

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: NaturalRegressor
Without even looking, I can tell you that it's a new experimental craft, and it could literally be any nation or aeronautics manufacturer in the world. They often perform tests in hostile airspace, either to test a new craft or to gauge our capabilities. It could be reconnaissance from an enemy nation, but that's worst case scenario.

Antigrav was made during the Nazi era and subsequently very well suppressed (most of us know this), so it could be an antigrav craft.

-NR

Finally someone simplifies things properly...anyone canbuild a neutral dimension craft...anyone....and anyone can own or fly one .....and I don't mean only multi-billionaires....I mean literally anyone who wants to invest as much moneyas it takes to buy a new car can finance and build their own craft.....research David Hamel and Searl and all the other people who have already shown us how these craft work and can be built.

Pretty sure Hamel has done nothing except build a non functioning magnetic doohickey.

And sure....anyone can build a non functional UFO and I am sure plenty have done just that.