Jesus said, NO DIVORCE: so how did Stripper/Actress Meghan Markle get a ‘Christian’ Wedding ?

a reply to: yuppa

Hi Yuppa---

You wrote QUOTE

'IT WAS NOT PALESTINE THEN. it was judea and Israel.'

UNQUOTE


I'm not sure what century you are referring-to in your comment. You should know that the so-called 'northern kingdom' of Yiso'el was destroyed by the Assyrians (BCE 735 - BCE 701), who annexed the land north of Yerushalayim; Yisro'el ceased to exist as a 'kingdom' with its own clan-chief/kinglet by 701 BCE.

As for 'Judaea', the Babylonians invaded and destroyed that 'petty-kingdom' in 587 BCE deporting thousands of the local inhabitants to Egypt and Babylonia; less than a third ever returned when 'Cyrus. my Messiah, saith YHWH' sent as many exiles as he could back home. To give you an idea of what was left, of the 24 priestly Judaean families (some of whom could trace their lineage back to the time of David) only 4 priestly families returned to re-build the Temple of YHWH at Yerushalayim.

As you should know, after Babylon ground Yerushalasyim and Judaea into powder along with its 'Solomonic' Tyrian-built temple to YHWH (and several there gods'goddesses apparently), Persia made Judaea a 'Satrapy' (i.e. colony of Persia) from BCE 531 to 331 (200 years of Persian rule) only to be taken-over by Syrian-Greeks (the Ptolmeys) who ruled until the 100-year semi-reign of the Maccabees beginning in 163 BCE - 63 BCE when Pompey of Rome invaded Jerusalem and made 'Judaea' a Roman province.

It is true that during the lifetime of R. Yehoshua bar Yosef theGalilean Nazir (aka 'Jesus'), following the death of Herod in 4 BCE, Palestine was subdivided by the Romans into sections (e.g. Judaea, Idumaea, Philistia, Shomeron (Samaria), Perea, the Decapolis ('ten-cities'), Phoenecia & the Galilee (haGilgal haGoyim ='the circle of gentiles').

Judaea was at the time merely one of many provinces in the region of the Levant, and only the southern end of this subdivision--and Israel by then was only a distant memory long since having 'gone the way of all flesh'.

But to your point, incorrect as it is, you are correct in asserting (I'm digging your capitalisation) that 'Palestina' was not the generic term the Romans technically used until the Roman Emperor Adrian (Lat. 'Hadrianus') re-named the whole larger region following the failed 2nd Jewish Revolt against Rome in 136 BCE under Bar-Kochbah/Kosiva when the Judaea population was forcibly removed, and Yerushalayim was re-named Aeolia Capitolina where fortresses and pagan temples were erected in the place where Judaea sacred sites once stood.

When I refer to the 'Palestinian Jewish population' in my discussions, I refer to the indigenous peoples in the area surrounding Jerusalem, as opposed to the great number of 'diaspora' Jews who (since c. BCE 500) freely mixed in with the local gentile populations through intermarriages/miscegenation in places like Babylon, Rome, Corinth, Antioch, Thessaloniki, Laodecaea, Galatia, Corinth, Alexandria and Athens etc.

Clear as mud ?

a reply to: RickinVa

Hi Rickin--

You wrote:

QUOTE

Never heard that Markle was a stripper. Got any pics to back up that claim? Inquiring minds want to know !'

UNQUOTE

Well it's going to be harder and harder to find any remaining 'photo-evidence' (non-Photoshop'd, of course !) for the short-lived stripping career of Rachel ('call-me-Meaghan') Markle (aka 'Princess Pushy') as the Royal Handlers are working overtime going around the globe confiscating damning evidence and paying-off photographers and news media outlets 'not to besmirch the family's escutcheon...'; they can hardly do anything about the infamous 90210 bobbing-up-and-down-in-the-front-seat-of-a-parked car-in-the-dark scene (looking good, Duchess!) or her unfortunate affiliation with the bisexual porn star and male-stripper Dirt Nasty back c. 2002/3 but they are doing their very best to squirt all the salacious mud off of her that had been accruing over the years since she was a 'desperate, struggling actress trying to survive in a man's business...'which had caused her (jokingly ?) to add 'stripper' on her CV next to other epithets as 'juggler', 'calligrapher' and 'baton-twirler'...

I understand the last one to fall recently was a video called 'Grilling Never Looked So Hot With Meghan Markle...The Ultimate Guy's Girl' in 2013 brought out by US Men's Health Magazine (photographed in lurid detail by Litty Samuel).In it, Ms. Pushy slowly stripped-off down to her bra, having started out with a pair of Nicole Miller Heels, an American Apparel skirt, a sheer-black top by It's OK My Dear and a white BCBG Blazer. Her sultry strip-off was done in the form of a Striper's Parody, but one would have to conjecture (after having seen it) that 'she's done this before...'

I shudder to think what our ultra conservative Rabbi Yehoshua bar Yosef ('Jesus') would have made of all this, considering the fact that he disallowed men even 'looking at a woman's body with lust in his heart...' ? Let's just say that one can only imagine that his forefinger would have been kept very busy tracing out the letters of LO TINEF in the sand if someone dared shew him that sultry piece of video footage.

There are some persons on this thread who would say that 'stripping down to a bra is not really stripping...to be called something approaching that term one must-needs be dancing naked and astride a pole...' but there was enough caught on camera for The Palace Machine to get US Men's Health Magazine to pull the video off the world wide web.

Ah well, there's plenty more where THAT came from since 2002 just lurking in the wild to be...well, exposed.

a reply to: Woodcarver

I wanna eat her shellfish.

originally posted by: Violater1
Gothmog, #2 is wrong. When a man and woman marry, the 2 become 1. When one is a Christian and the other is not, when the other dies, they die a Christian. THAT is how loving and lawful GOD IS.

you mean to say that if one is a Christian, then the other is a Christian by default if the Christian person dies? I haven't heard that before, where did you read that at in the Bible?

a reply to: Xtrozero

blood of Jesus flowing in their veins, that is why they are royalty in the first place

ya think?

I think they are of the "reptilian" bloodline. The ones that Jesus warned about

a reply to: ketsuko

Hi Ket

You wrote; (More people are seeing Religion for what it is : Nonsense...)

QUOTE

'Those bits about not killing, not stealing, not coveting ... nonsense. I gotcha'.

UNQUOTE

I think the poster was thinking about more than the Hebrew Decalgoue ('Ten Commandments') although the Decalogue contains a great deal of inherent xenophobia

l. 'I am your clan-god YHWH who led you out of the house of Slavery in Mitzrayim ('Egypt') - you will have no other clan-gods before my faces.' (i.e. in the Temples)

I'm not sure about you, but I was never a Hapiru ('land-thieving nomad') slave in Mitzrayim, so I cannot see how this one applies to modern Terran humans in the West.

2. 'You shall not make any graven (or 'molten') images for yourselves'. I guess the Hollywood motion-picture industry (or anyone using a video-camera or cell-phone lens, or even a photo-copier) has been busy dis-obeying this one. Get the stones out, it's going to be a busy year...

3. 'You will not raise-up ('mention' ?) the name of YHWH your clan-god for light [ Heb. 'Sheva', lit. 'empty' ] purposes.' Well, not too many people go around saying 'Yahweh dang-it !' so I guess this one's easier to keep. Or maybe not.

I think these few are enough to illustrate my point that ancient religious laws were meant for ancient pre-scientific people who believed they had to be told NOT to cast a spell on your neighbor's oxen (KJV 'covet' is actually from Heb. 'Keshet' i.e. 'to attract or cling-to by sorcery').

'Nuff said.

originally posted by: Sigismundus

l. 'I am your clan-god YHWH who led you out of the house of Slavery in Mitzrayim ('Egypt') - you will have no other clan-gods before my faces.' (i.e. in the Temples)

We are under the presumption that this was the Most High God. Therefore, you would certainly not need any other gods to help you. Doing so would only compromise your birthright from the founder and King of the universe.

2. 'You shall not make any graven (or 'molten') images for yourselves'. I guess the Hollywood motion-picture industry (or anyone using a video-camera or cell-phone lens, or even a photo-copier) has been busy dis-obeying this one. Get the stones out, it's going to be a busy year...

Similar to the first. God's true name is unspeakable, and has no particular form. God can give you anything you want, so why would you seek after anything else?

3. 'You will not raise-up ('mention' ?) the name of YHWH your clan-god for light [ Heb. 'Sheva', lit. 'empty' ] purposes.' Well, not too many people go around saying 'Yahweh dang-it !' so I guess this one's easier to keep. Or maybe not.

Ever meditate on the grandiose nature of the universe and tremble? God made all of it. He does not take his love for you lightly. It would be disrespectful to take His work lightly.

I think these few are enough to illustrate my point that ancient religious laws were meant for ancient pre-scientific people who believed they had to be told NOT to cast a spell on your neighbor's oxen (KJV 'covet' is actually from Heb. 'Keshet' i.e. 'to attract or cling-to by sorcery').

It needs to be addressed in a proper lens, otherwise it will remain an anachronism. To desire something so immensely, like wealth or sex, is sure to wreak havoc on the peace of your nervous system. Constantly activating the sympathetic nervous system, always stressed, digging a bottomless pit. Someone who desires nothing already has everything

a reply to: Sigismundus

Thou shall not kill.
How many killings have been carried out in the name of Jesus and God?

Jesus said its easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
How much wealth has been amassed by individual 'Christians' and numerous 'Christian' churches?

Need I go on because there's an endless number of examples of where the 'Christian' gospel has been ignored by Christians and almost every Christian institution and denomination.

Surely there are far more important things to concern yourself about than this?

a reply to: Sigismundus

If the Christian Founder (‘Jesus’) said, ‘There Shall Be No Divorce—EVER’ then WHY was ex-Stripper (& B-Actress) Rachel ‘Call me Meghan’ Markle allowed to be married (in white !) in a ‘CHRISTIAN’ Royal Wedding ?

Several reasons are at hand. Firstly you must consider that the UK has a national religion which is governed by a political complicated organization of bishops. What is good today was bad yesterday type of religious government prevails today as it does in the American culture with all of their denominations.

What is called Christianity today was not what Jesus taught in His ministry and is nationalized blasphemy in both the UK and U.S.. The people demand change and do not want a deity to interfere with their ways of life. Most all who claim Christianity are not Christians by any measure of the teachings of the apostles and are not even affected by the truth of most bibles. The U.S. has this very same mindset which is controlled by a few politicians instead of a nationalized church.

To answer your question is simply to realized that the marriage of this type is not honored by Jesus and will be judged in death. The only divorcement of a Godly union is through death.

1Corinthians 7:39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.

Note that there are two stipulations to this law. Death is the first and remarriage by God is the second. Secular marriages out of the blessings of God are not honored by God. How do we know what the law is? By the covenant of Jesus [Christianity] we know by His teachers the apostles.

Almost everything Christians do today is a direct insult to Christ. Their conscience doesn't really know it. But the snake within them knows it.

And as a result, the way they live their life, the thoughts they have, the actions they do, are all unrighteous.

It is such a truth in today's world that Christians have ZERO regard for Christ. They serve a deity that is false in every way. And as a result of that - they vibrate negative energies and frequencies of hatred, and have no will to heal others. They do not even know the complexities as to why they give off negative energy, but they do slightly know that they have it. But indeed they are judgmental negative humans walking down a path of hatred and loathing towards life. Much of it has to do with their rejection of truth. They make a choice to reject truth and not investigate further to see what is true or not, and although they do not know Truth, their soul and subconscious is well aware. But they think that their ego is all that there is. They do not know that the soul is real and that God does communicate with us all the time. They do not know the language of God, thinking that God is like some man with a beard up in the clouds. They are completely clueless to their being a Creator of the world and the universe that loves that which has been created. They have no idea that Truth comes from God and that faith means a person Trusts God because they know that God is where all Truth comes from.

They do not need to be blind. But their ego and pride and arrogance is so much, that is totally blinds them more than ten blindfolds around their head.

I am blind also but the difference is that I believe in God, that means that I am blind but I know God is there, inside of me and also inside of everyone else. They are blind but even though they claim to believe in God they do not, because if they did, they would eventually get to know God, but because they have not tried to get to know God they have not begun the process for them to realize that they are a child of God. And people it takes more than one day to learn this. It can take many years to get to know God. The knowledge of the soul is mysterious and sacred, it is not just handed out to those who do not deserve it, but it is granted as a personal gift to those who have showed that they deserve it. God listens to every truth you tell and every untruth you tell.