It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This is the same legal system that jailed Oscar Wilde and Alan Turing for being gay. “Hey, they broke the law” isn’t a sufficient enough argument when the laws stink. This is an entirely unjust arrest by an unjust law enforcement.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This is the same legal system that jailed Oscar Wilde and Alan Turing for being gay. “Hey, they broke the law” isn’t a sufficient enough argument when the laws stink. This is an entirely unjust arrest by an unjust law enforcement.
He didn't break a law.
He was recording with his phone on a public street. People record on their phones in public all the time across England.
The government levied a false claim against him that he was essentially disturbing the peace. He was not. They're simply trying to cover up the Muslim grooming gangs.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: TrueBrit
Oh dear lord! Pointing out and denouncing the very loopholes and weasel words and actions that allow for this injustice is not a lack of understanding!!!! It's the ultimate understanding!!!
Keep protecting the abuse that continues for exactly the reasons you are defending. I won't. Our words will stand on their own merit.
And now I'm done with you.
The rights of the accused are a concern. The right to not be identified as the accused is a whole other ballgame they played FOR the rapists. It is sure how it looks from here.
Right to face your accuser and in a court of law precludes privacy. If it goes to court it is now a public matter, period.
The perps need exposed for their crimes and if innocent, exoneration. That is all this is about and it sounds like rapists are being coddled.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Sublimecraft
Which part of his behaviour? Probably the part where he created a false narrative designed to inspire anger and action amongst his support base, who have been known to cause violence.
originally posted by: skywatcher44
Here is the London News page from our BBC and not a hint of any Orwellian behavior. Stinks, very smelly Indeed..
www.bbc.co.uk...
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: skywatcher44
"We might as well be North Korea." Out of the mouth of babes..... All of these brain washed people promoting globalism and the NWO should listen closely to this young lasses words!
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: skywatcher44
"We might as well be North Korea." Out of the mouth of babes..... All of these brain washed people promoting globalism and the NWO should listen closely to this young lasses words!
She's an idiot, he's not jailed, he's held in a police cell until Tuesday, due to it being bank holiday weekend. Otherwise he'd be out the next day.
The right to a fair trial or innocent until proven guilty protect an individual from being set up by courts and governments and are precisely what separates us from North Korea.
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: skywatcher44
"We might as well be North Korea." Out of the mouth of babes..... All of these brain washed people promoting globalism and the NWO should listen closely to this young lasses words!
She's an idiot, he's not jailed, he's held in a police cell until Tuesday, due to it being bank holiday weekend. Otherwise he'd be out the next day.
The right to a fair trial or innocent until proven guilty protect an individual from being set up by courts and governments and are precisely what separates us from North Korea.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: skywatcher44
"We might as well be North Korea." Out of the mouth of babes..... All of these brain washed people promoting globalism and the NWO should listen closely to this young lasses words!
She's an idiot, he's not jailed, he's held in a police cell until Tuesday, due to it being bank holiday weekend. Otherwise he'd be out the next day.
The right to a fair trial or innocent until proven guilty protect an individual from being set up by courts and governments and are precisely what separates us from North Korea.
Do you have proof he will be released on Tuesday????
Would love to see it if you have it, other wise your are talking out of your nether orifice.....
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Irishhaf
There seems to have been a misunderstanding.
People believe, largely owing to a lack of intellect, that being against violence used to oppress the weak, is the same as being against violence for any reason. I however, accept that unfortunately, the human race is such a thing, as to present examples of people who must be countered in total fashion, with no opportunity for them to survive to continue to threaten the whole.
The thing that sets me and others of my thinking apart from our cousins across the water, and indeed those within my own nation who believe that wiping out religious groups on the basis of poor behaviour on the part of a statistically irrelevant few is acceptable, is that unlike those folk, I am correct to say that the target of my ire is a threat to the rest, where as our American cousins and some of my less intellectually capable countrymen are not.
I am correct to say that fascists, racists and eugenicists should be countered in absolute fashion, that if they dare to try and take power for themselves, they must be eradicated without delay, because unlike any of the religious groups on Earth, whose members range from the entirely peaceful overwhelming majority, to the small number of nutters and thugs we see scapegoated on the news, fascists, racists and eugenicists are ALL a threat to our species, its peace, its ability to act as a cohesive unit, and its ability to continue to exist going forward.
The historical evidence for that is overwhelming, which means if I am having to explain these things at all, then with respect, someone needs to go ahead and do some research.
Violence used to prevent the destruction of the entire species, by those who would have us all inbreeding and failing to learn and grow, violence used to protect liberty from the grasping hands of the fascist tyrants of Tommy's sort, is not wrong. Being willing to embrace brutality against those who pose a mortal threat to the entire population of this planet, is not morally or ethically incorrect. It is pragmatic. The species must survive, and it will not if it is divided by ignorant people, following a flawed policy which has been proven to be fallacious by science, by philosophical examination, and by the harrowing effects of its deeds in the past.
I am unwilling to permit Nazis to rise in my vicinity without their utter and total destruction coming about. I am no pacifist. I merely differ from others in that unlike Robinson and his ilk, I am right about the identity of the true threat to this planets population, where as they are not. Unlike them, I am correct when I say that ALL my enemies mean to harm our species, that NONE of them are innocent in heart, that ALL are corrupted by ignorant fury, and are willing to see us all burn, rather than survive, if survival means accepting that which they do not understand.