It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
Going back to the OP question, if an all knowing god was shown to be proven then why would I even bother pretending to worship it? It would surely already know I thought it was a barbaric monster. Pretty crap god if it needed me to tell it.
"Yeah, carry on eating your popcorn mate while you watch children starve to death, prick"
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
Is 50/50.
Is there a possibility for God to exist? Yes.
Is there a possibility for God not exist? Yes.
Is there a probability for God to exist? Yes
Is there a probability for God not exist? Yes.
We literally just had this convo a couple of pages ago. We calculate probability by collecting as much evidence that supports such a claim, evaluating that evidence, and then coming to a conclusion.
So first, we need to look at this evidence. What? There is none? Well then that clearly puts the probability close to zero. Unless you have some evidence that no one else has seen yet?
Based on what you just typed. The evidence is zero for both. Still 50/50.
Sorry, but that is not how that works. For instance, there is no evidence that supports the existence of dragons. Would you say the probability for them existing is 50/50? I can find stories about them in books.
Yeah cool god who watches children die of starvation. Your god is a barbaric animal in my opinion, if it actually even exists as some all powerful entity.
originally posted by: anotherside
My hypothetical God is yahweh. A true understanding father of ages and written word.
Again, you are missing the point. Bring together all of the evidence for the existence of magical fire breathing dragons, and we’ll have a big bowl of nothing to evaluate. We’ll put it next the the big empty barrel of evidence for god, and then we’ll see which one is more valid than the other.
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
Is 50/50.
Is there a possibility for God to exist? Yes.
Is there a possibility for God not exist? Yes.
Is there a probability for God to exist? Yes
Is there a probability for God not exist? Yes.
We literally just had this convo a couple of pages ago. We calculate probability by collecting as much evidence that supports such a claim, evaluating that evidence, and then coming to a conclusion.
So first, we need to look at this evidence. What? There is none? Well then that clearly puts the probability close to zero. Unless you have some evidence that no one else has seen yet?
Based on what you just typed. The evidence is zero for both. Still 50/50.
Sorry, but that is not how that works. For instance, there is no evidence that supports the existence of dragons. Would you say the probability for them existing is 50/50? I can find stories about them in books.
How do you explain the fact that you know about them? Someone saw something and call it dragon. Just because you don't see it does not mean it did not exist.
Gather all of the evidence to support that claim. I have another bucket that should fit all of it.
originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat
Stopped reading on the fourth page so sorry if I repeat info but don't forget those people looking outside themselves to define god (and FYI I do believe in a god in that sense too) don't forget about the very ancient, albeit unpopular belief which is making a major comeback today that says that this universe only has one inhabitant, god. And god has somehow shattered its consciousness into billions of pieces which all live separate lives unaware of the fact that I am you and you are I and when we die we remember this making it a bit less depressing to contemplate reincarnation which always spooked me growing up cuz I would only think, "my god, you mean love another woman as much as and call that woman mommy too?!? No thank you!" That lonely thought becomes a lot easier to stomach when I realize in such a universe the African tribeswoman in 2093 who gives birth to me is the exact same person as the woman who did so in the 20th century on the other side of the planet. And even if orphaned, I am the exact same person both of them are anyway.
I did my dishes just now, got a couple of clean Chinese takeaway containers you can borrow to fit the 'proof' of gods in if you like, just message me.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Gather all of the evidence to support that claim. I have another bucket that should fit all of it.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Again, you are missing the point. Bring together all of the evidence for the existence of magical fire breathing dragons, and we’ll have a big bowl of nothing to evaluate. We’ll put it next the the big empty barrel of evidence for god, and then we’ll see which one is more valid than the other.
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
Is 50/50.
Is there a possibility for God to exist? Yes.
Is there a possibility for God not exist? Yes.
Is there a probability for God to exist? Yes
Is there a probability for God not exist? Yes.
We literally just had this convo a couple of pages ago. We calculate probability by collecting as much evidence that supports such a claim, evaluating that evidence, and then coming to a conclusion.
So first, we need to look at this evidence. What? There is none? Well then that clearly puts the probability close to zero. Unless you have some evidence that no one else has seen yet?
Based on what you just typed. The evidence is zero for both. Still 50/50.
Sorry, but that is not how that works. For instance, there is no evidence that supports the existence of dragons. Would you say the probability for them existing is 50/50? I can find stories about them in books.
How do you explain the fact that you know about them? Someone saw something and call it dragon. Just because you don't see it does not mean it did not exist.
originally posted by: Abednego
Again, I'm not missing the point, is that you do not want to accept that the lack of evidence is not sufficient to disprove something.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
However, again apparently, we decided to know good and evil and it all went to # from there.
originally posted by: noonebutme
Or, are they saying YOUR lack of evidence for YOUR claim is not enough to convince THEM to believe your position?
I think that's really what people are saying. At least, that's what I'm saying.
originally posted by: noonebutme
Also, logistically, probably, there is no God. I'm basing that not on the 'lack of evidence', but on the sheer size and scale of the universe and the amount of endless, mindless destruction within it; stars exploding every second causing unfathomable amounts of chaos and destruction. Why on Earth would a God create all that? It makes zero sense, if we're to believe in a God as portrayed within the bible or other religious books.
All those ancient writings prove, is that they wrote some things down. Some people believed a thing. That does nothing to prove that what they believed was valid. Do you believe everything that they wrote down? Or have you selectively chosen the little tidbits that you like, and disposed of the rest? How many homosexuals have you put to death? How often do you eat pork or shrimp? These are things that people believed. Why would you accept some of that stuff but you don’t accept others? We have come a long way since then haven’t we? We know better than they did. We know very well when they were embellishing stories. Because some of that # is impossible.
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Again, you are missing the point. Bring together all of the evidence for the existence of magical fire breathing dragons, and we’ll have a big bowl of nothing to evaluate. We’ll put it next the the big empty barrel of evidence for god, and then we’ll see which one is more valid than the other.
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: Abednego
Is 50/50.
Is there a possibility for God to exist? Yes.
Is there a possibility for God not exist? Yes.
Is there a probability for God to exist? Yes
Is there a probability for God not exist? Yes.
We literally just had this convo a couple of pages ago. We calculate probability by collecting as much evidence that supports such a claim, evaluating that evidence, and then coming to a conclusion.
So first, we need to look at this evidence. What? There is none? Well then that clearly puts the probability close to zero. Unless you have some evidence that no one else has seen yet?
Based on what you just typed. The evidence is zero for both. Still 50/50.
Sorry, but that is not how that works. For instance, there is no evidence that supports the existence of dragons. Would you say the probability for them existing is 50/50? I can find stories about them in books.
How do you explain the fact that you know about them? Someone saw something and call it dragon. Just because you don't see it does not mean it did not exist.
Again, I'm not missing the point, is that you do not want to accept that the lack of evidence is not sufficient to disprove something.
The evidence we have about the existence of a god or gods is based on what the ancient civilizations wrote. That does not mean they are wrong. Again, they saw or experience something that we do not understand but they call it god(s).
Every civilization in the world, from ancient time to today have some set of beliefs about spiritual or extraordinary beings capable of doing things that we do not comprehend.
That is proof that they saw something, you may want to call it whatever you want: YHVH, Odin, Zeus, Jupiter, Shiva, Quetzacoatl, Ra, Baal, pick a name.
Another evidence is the many people witnessing miracles or been part of them (some maybe true others may not to be honest).
But still they saw and experience something.
Feel free to browse the net to find the testimonials. (Don't believe everything)
If you don't believe, I respect that.
Have a good night.
That’s not a train of thought, you just wrote down genesis and claimed that’s your opinion. You are literally trying to pass off genesis as an original thought that you just had. That is true indoctrination. Congratulations!! You are fully assimilated into the hive.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
Going back to the OP question, if an all knowing god was shown to be proven then why would I even bother pretending to worship it? It would surely already know I thought it was a barbaric monster. Pretty crap god if it needed me to tell it.
"Yeah, carry on eating your popcorn mate while you watch children starve to death, prick"
Lol
Well apparently there was a time when we existed in paradise.
All the food we could eat (apart from the fruit from that one tree over there).
We didn't even need clothes the weather was that nice.
However, again apparently, we decided to know good and evil and it all went to # from there.
Adam suddenly thought his ding ding was too small, Eve wasn't happy with the size of her hips. God wasn't happy about this either.
There was a lot of blame shifting, "oooo the serpent tricked me, ooooo the women talked me into it" instead of someone just taking responsibility for their own # up.
As a result, the serpent's got no legs, Eve needs pethidine when squeezing one out and we gotta toil the land for food!
Now, I don't know about anyone else, but if I started questioning God about starving children I'd imagine his response would be something like:
"WTF you on about? I had it all set up nice. You wanted something else so I let you have at it. Left you to it. Now tell me, what did you personally, and you as humanity as a whole do about those starving children?"
We can't have it both ways can we?
Or can we?
DISCLAIMER: Not a belief. Just a train of thought
How literally do you take the stories of yahweh?
originally posted by: anotherside
My hypothetical God is yahweh. A true understanding father of ages and written word.
Im a christian with a former hebrew x girlfriend. Peace through wisdom all.